Posted on 08/29/2005 11:45:54 AM PDT by areafiftyone
Do you have any thoughts on WHAT Pat wrote?
Or are you just a Pat Hater who wants to vent?
Sorry, have seen the Pacific Coast? Its beautiful.
Lets just give them LA/SF/NYC and New England.
Kinda like us in the 19th century, huh? :-)
Here in the Triangle, the idiots are killing the home owners to support all the illegals. The schools are flooded so they raised our property rates to pay for all the English as a Second Language Schools.
He wants us to become the North American Community just like the CFR has told him to do. He doesen't care a whit about national soverignty, he wants open borders to facilitate trade with our latin american neighbors so we can become the equivalent of the EU.
"Sorry, have seen the Pacific Coast? Its beautiful.
Lets just give them LA/SF/NYC and New England."
I say we give them nothing but a free ride back to Mexico!
Giving them our socialist areas will only insure that those areas remain socialist (and corrupt).
Pat's demagoguery has the same odor as New Orleans about now.
As usual, GWB is WWWAAAAAAAYYYYYYY behind the curve.
"Defend the borders" is a fairly important responsibility. GWB's failure to do so is plainly a dereliction of duty, just like signing McCain-Feingold was.
Yeah... I guess I can see your point. I was just floored when I heard where the "vigilante" comment occurred and wasn't sure if others knew. I think Condi Rice had just been meeting with Mexico/Canada a couple of weeks before that too, promising the world to them as per the CFR open borders plan.
"GWB's failure to do so is plainly a dereliction of duty, just like signing McCain-Feingold was."
I agree. Allowing for the crimminalization of political speech was a crime in and of itself. McCain-Feingold was targeted at one of his biggest allies, the NRA, and he rewarded them with a stab in the back. Same thing works with the border situation. A lot of Republicans voted for him hoping that once he went into his lame-duck term that he'd show more back-bone but he continues the Hispano-pandering full bore.
Buchanan has either truly lost his mind, or his bloated ego is so starved for attention that he would play into the hands of the radical left (who want to impeach the President for any reason) in exchange for some media coverage.
If the latter is the case, he is a disgrace to his country. I strongly disagree with the President's border policy as well, but for Buchanan to call for the impeachment of this President on these facts, during a time of war, is beyond outrageous.
I am very interested to see how many FReepers in the Buchanan Brigade decide to follow their Pied Piper right off a cliff.
"I am very interested to see how many FReepers in the Buchanan Brigade decide to follow their Pied Piper right off a cliff."
If Bush keeps up these decrepit border-control policies, him and his other Bushbots will lead us right into a radioactive mushroom cloud.
So are you Buchananites going to try stage another "Impeachment hearing" in some vacant Capitol conference room with Johnny Conyers and Maxine Waters?
Because you don't appear to have read my initial post, I'll repeat it: I strongly disagree with the President on his immigration policies, as do many conservative Bush-supporters. That said, Buchanan is an absolute buffoon who apparently is willing to say anything in order to get some attention from the rabidly anti-Bush media. He is nothing more than a media whore who quit putting the best interests of his country ahead of his own interests a long time ago.
Nah not their style. Buchanan supported Bush in the past election because he hates Democrats.
But Buchananites found out that by voting for the lesser of two evils in the last election, they got evil. I think next time they will sit on their hands or vote for gridlock as the most conservative option.
"But Buchananites found out that by voting for the lesser of two evils in the last election, they got evil."
Boy, those Buchananites sure are adept at ascertaining evil. I guess that's why we were treated to Pat's recent reflections on whether stopping the threat of Adolf Hilter in World War II was "worth it".
"So are you Buchananites going to try stage another "Impeachment hearing" in some vacant Capitol conference room with Johnny Conyers and Maxine Waters?"
Heh heh, no...I don't forsee that happening any time soon. The issue of impeachment is another way of attracting attention to the issue.
"That said, Buchanan is an absolute buffoon who apparently is willing to say anything in order to get some attention from the rabidly anti-Bush media."
Buchanan says the truth as much as he needs to, regardless of how many RINOs would like him to keep silent. Like the Minutemen, he does a good job of keeping the attention on the border issue exactly as it deserves to be.
"He is nothing more than a media whore who quit putting the best interests of his country ahead of his own interests a long time ago."
So, opposing a policy that creates additional vulnerability to terrorism is not in the country's interest? Without people like him and the Minutemen, there would be no incentive whatsoever to make any changes to the current suicidal immigration policies. I think you're just jealous that his solid Lincoln/Eisenhower-style nationalism makes him a true conservative. Unlike the many RINO "Luv ya Dubya" sychophants who'd rather lick Bush's boots than encourage him to move in the right direction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.