Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Isnít Bush On The Border? (Idiot Pat Buchanan Suggests Bush Impeachment! BARF ALERT!)
Tracy Press ^ | 8/29/05

Posted on 08/29/2005 11:45:54 AM PDT by areafiftyone

Published on Monday, August 29, 2005, in the Tracy Press. WASHINGTON — On Aug. 12, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson declared a state of emergency "due to a chaotic situation involving illegal alien smuggling and illegal drug shipments" on his southern border. Three days later, Gov. Janet Napolitano followed suit in Arizona.

Reason: the crisis on the border. The ally-ally-in-free immigration policy of George Bush and Vicente Fox, beloved of corporate America, has created a hell on our southern border.

Those Southwestern states are being inundated by illegal aliens trashing ranches, killing cattle, committing crimes and eating up tax dollars. The traffic in narcotics and human beings from Mexico is a national scandal and a human rights disgrace.

What is true of New Mexico and Arizona is true of our nation, which is home to an estimated 10 million to 15 million aliens who have broken our laws and broken into our country. It is a mark of the cowardice of our leaders that they are so terrified of being called "bigots" that they tolerate this criminality. The moral rot of political correctness runs deep today in both national parties.

A president like Teddy Roosevelt would have led the Army to the border years ago. And if Fox did not cooperate, T.R. would have gone on to Mexico City. Nor would Ike, who deported all illegal aliens in 1953, have stood still for this being done to the country he had defended in war.

What are these Bush Republicans afraid of? Dirty looks from the help at the country club?

The question of whether America is going to remain one nation, or whether our Southwest will wind up as a giant Kosovo separated by language and loyalty from the rest of America is on the table.

Where is Bush? All wrapped up in the issue of whether women in Najaf will have the same rights in divorce and custody cases as women in Nebraska. His legislative agenda for the fall includes a blanket amnesty for illegals, so they can be exploited by businesses who want to hold wages down as they dump the social costs for their employees health care, schools, courts, cops, prisons onto taxpayers.

Not only have Richardson and Napolitano awakened — they are on the front lines — so, too, has Hillary Clinton, who has spoken out against illegal immigration with a forthrightness that makes Bush sound like a talking head for La Raza.

Why is a Republican Congress permitting this president to persist in the dereliction of his sworn duty?

Bush is chief executive of the United States. It is his duty to enforce the laws. Can anyone fairly say he is enforcing the immigration laws? Those laws are clear. People who break in are to be sent back. Yet, more than 10 million have broken in with impunity.

Another million try to break in every year. Half a million succeed. Border security is homeland security. How, then, can the Department of Homeland Security say America is secure?

Who can guarantee that, of the untold millions of illegals here, and the scores of thousands ordered deported for crimes who have disappeared into our midst, none is a terrorist waiting for orders to blow up a subway or mall and massacre American citizens?

Most of these illegals come to work to send money back to their families. They are not bad people. But because they are predominantly young and male, they commit a disproportionate share of violent crimes.

Why should U.S. citizens be assaulted, robbed, raped and murdered, and have their children molested, because their government will not enforce its own laws?

Is this not an indictment of democracy itself? What dictatorial regime would put up with this?

The Republican Party claims to be a conservative party. But what kind of conservative is it who, to cut a few costs or make a few bucks, will turn his family's home into a neighborhood flop house?

In a recent poll, 40 percent of Mexicans " 40 million people said they would like to come to the United States, and 20 percent expressed a willingness to break in. Time to cut the babble about how NAFTA is going to solve the problem. This is a national emergency.

Twice, Bush has taken an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Article IV, Section 4 of that Constitution reads," The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion."

Well, we are being invaded, and the president of the United States is not doing his duty to protect the states against that invasion.

Some courageous Republican, to get the attention of this White House, should drop into the hopper a bill of impeachment, charging Bush with a conscious refusal to uphold his oath and defend the states of the Union against "invasion."

It may be the only way left to get his attention, before the border vanishes and our beloved country dissolves into MexAmerica, what T.R. called a "polyglot boarding house for the world."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; bitterpaleos; bordersecurity; buchanan; bushamnesty; bushbotrage; illegalaliens; immigrantlist; invasionusa; openborders; patbuchanan; williegreensdaddy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-193 next last
To: Willie Green

Sad but true...


81 posted on 08/29/2005 3:06:52 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Don't forget who dreamed up NAFTA in the first place.

Ronald Reagan?

82 posted on 08/29/2005 3:11:14 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Pat's on the money. W is not doing his job on the border! Also he failed America and his oath of office by signing campaign reform. And he spends like a drunken sailor.

The problem may be his advisers Rove etc. He squeaked through 2 elections where he should have won by landslides.

But we are fortunate that Gore or Kerry didn't win, those two would have completed the destruction of America well on the way by the Democrats.

In 08 we have to elect a Bush +++.

83 posted on 08/29/2005 3:14:31 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
"Where is Bush? All wrapped up in the issue of whether women in Najaf will have the same rights in divorce and custody cases as women in Nebraska. "

More anti Iraq war talk from Buchanan. His hatred of President Bush must be eating his insides up for him to belittle the sacrifices our troops are making in Iraq to defend us from an enemy who has attacked us on our soil and vowed to destroy us.

The vileness of this little man will never end.

84 posted on 08/29/2005 3:20:08 PM PDT by bayourod (Blue collar foreign laborers create white collar jobs. If they come they will build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

I agree; Buchanan is right on this one. Bush was elected to serve, not rule, and he is clearly at odds with both his electorate and the population. He should either enforce immigration law or resign.


85 posted on 08/29/2005 3:20:48 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lobbyist
President Bush's missteps on immigration don't rise to the level of impeachment.

Since when does one's refusal to enforce the law of the land become a "misstep"?
86 posted on 08/29/2005 3:22:23 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Just when I thought I couldn't think any less of pat the-sore-loser, he gives yet another reason to despise him.


87 posted on 08/29/2005 3:29:37 PM PDT by mombonn (°Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Pat just hates Bush and immigration is just the issue that Pat, his puppet Tancredo, and their worshipers are using to attack the President. If we had a wall on the border and illegal immigration was almost nil, they'd be attacking the President over something else. They hate President Bush, they've always hated President Bush, and nothing he does will ever change that.
88 posted on 08/29/2005 3:32:18 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
2008 is going to be a total mess for the Republicans. We will be split in half like the Dems were in 2004. Sad, but it will happen. Strange feeling I have.

No we're not. In 2004, the Buchananites were predicting that the GOP would suffer and Tancredo would get a huge number of write in votes. In the end everyone but the 1-percenters backed the President.

89 posted on 08/29/2005 3:35:20 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
Why is he not calling on the Judiciary Committee .Are they not in charge of Immigration?Where is Spector on this matter or whoever is in charge in Congress.In fact where are the Senators from the besieged states?
Buchanan has been trying to impeach Bush for at least a year now.Ever time I put on Hardball there he is bad mouthing Bush.Now he will be out in force since Sheehan was not able in Pat`s words to "tip the scale against the war"I think he has a hatred against the entire Bush family.He has never said a good word about them all the way back to Bush 41.Buchanan and McCain should finally admit they are not Republicans and move on to the left .
90 posted on 08/29/2005 3:46:55 PM PDT by ricoshea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ricoshea

Here You go Pat.Call these people instead of Bush.

Judiciary Committee of Congress.
The Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims shall have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: immigration and naturalization, border security, admission of refugees, treaties, conventions and international agreements, claims against the United States, federal charters of incorporation, private immigration and claims bills, non-border enforcement, other appropriate matters as referred by the Chairman, and relevant oversight.






Hon. Hostettler
Chairman
(R) Indiana, 8th

Hon. King
(R) Iowa, 5th

Hon. Gohmert
(R) Texas, 1st

Hon. Smith
(R) Texas, 21st

Hon. Gallegly
(R) California, 24th

Hon. Goodlatte
(R) Virginia, 6th

Hon. Lungren
(R) California, 3rd

Hon. Flake
(R) Arizona, 6th

Hon. Inglis
(R) South Carolina, 4th

Hon. Issa
(R) California, 49th


Hon. Jackson Lee
Ranking Member
(D) Texas, 18th

Hon. Berman
(D) California, 28th

Hon. Lofgren
(D) California, 16th

Hon. Sánchez
(D) California, 39th

Hon. Waters
(D) California, 35th

Hon. Meehan
(D) Massachusetts, 5th





91 posted on 08/29/2005 3:55:01 PM PDT by ricoshea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative

I have news for you. They want all of us to be in the original 13 colonies. They want the whole enchillada.


92 posted on 08/29/2005 4:08:12 PM PDT by television is just wrong (http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

"Since when does one's refusal to enforce the law of the land become a "misstep"?"

Poor choice of words. Sorry.


93 posted on 08/29/2005 4:10:49 PM PDT by Lobbyist (I want my American dream!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I blame George W. because he has seen the effects of terrorism on HIS watch and should have learned enough from that about securing our borders.

You can't tell a cop "others were speeding too" and expect to escape punishment.

94 posted on 08/29/2005 4:12:33 PM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

"He has a point. Blaming Clinton, and Bush 1, and Reagan for not tightening up the borders is correct, but W is the President at this time, has been for 5 years, 4 years since 9/11, and he has refused to take action."


Exactly. It's amazing that, 5 years into his presidency, Bushbots still refuse to hold him accountable for ANYthing, preferring to blame Clintax for all our problems, while Bush continues to ignore our borders.


95 posted on 08/29/2005 4:16:58 PM PDT by Blzbba (For a man who does not know to which port he is sailing, no wind is favorable - Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Remember what the Minute Men were called?

The fact is, President Bush used the word "vigilante" very carefuly, and I don't think he gets enough credit for the political savvy he has displayed in both using the word, and in the way he's blown off Conservatives over the issue (no, I don't like the way he's handling it, but I can give him credit for being the consumate politician).

I hope and pray another terrorist attack doesn't happen on US soil, but if it does, and it's traced to our southern border...there are going to be a lot of angry Republicans looking for another party (not to mention it would be handing over the White House to the democrats).
96 posted on 08/29/2005 4:24:30 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
Exactly. It's amazing that, 5 years into his presidency, Bushbots still refuse to hold him accountable for ANYthing, preferring to blame Clintax for all our problems, while Bush continues to ignore our borders.

If you count his time as Governor of Texas....and I won't lie to you - I voted for him as President after seeing his actions as Governor, knowing full well that illegal immigration would be blown off. Of course at the time, I didn't see 9/11 happening..
97 posted on 08/29/2005 4:26:31 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Seems to me we had this problem every since I can remember. Yet even Pat suggests this is the fault of this President? Are all of you almost as sick of him being blamed for everything as I am?


98 posted on 08/29/2005 4:26:35 PM PDT by ladyinred (Leftist=Anti American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

bump for later. (actually to see if this thread gets pulled).


99 posted on 08/29/2005 4:29:32 PM PDT by Rebelbase ("Run Hillary Run" bumper stickers. Liberals place on rear bumper, conservatives put on front bumper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Posted earlier today;

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1472709/posts


100 posted on 08/29/2005 4:32:10 PM PDT by fallujah-nuker (Atque ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appelant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson