Impeach Bush! (Joseph Farah On Upholding American Sovereignty Alert)

Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 08/31/05 | Joseph Farah

[TBP]

It's the Federal government's duty to protect the states from invasion,a nd we're being invaded. It's just that these invaders aren't wearing uniforms and carrying military weapons.

[goldstategop]

We have a real problem and burying our heads in the sand isn't going to make it go away. We can either have open borders or we can have a United States Of America. What we cannot do as the President seems to think, is have both. There's no such animal.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[Racehorse]

Farah is a loon.

That may be, but could you please explain how he is wrong on this one.

He went too far by supporting a call for impeachment.

But, IMHO, he's right about:

[Bush] prefers to promote a vague immigration "reform" plan that involved a "guest worker" program

. . . this nation finds itself in a desperate war declared by a formidable foe determined to use our open borders to destroy this country that we must act now.

Bush claims it is because America needs cheap labor. That's what the law of supply and demand is all about. It's not his duty or responsibility to acquire workers for big corporations and other fat cats below what the market will support.

My response is to send a message by voting against incumbents of both political parties in local and state elections.

[Kryptonite]

Wow. Impeach Bush. This guy is certifiable. He's like McBrien in the Catholic church - anything goes when it comes to bashing, even if it directly contradicts your position on anything else.

Farah bashes Bush; McBrien bashes Catholics. No news here.

[DoughtyOne]

Okay, you don't like Joe and Pat. Does that alter the facts?

Article four Section four states that the President will protect the states against invasion. If three million illegal crossings a year isn't an invasion, please tell us what would be.

We are still allowing people to enter the United States from terrorist states. Is that a fulfillment of Bush's oath?

Sorry guy, but on this issue there is one person off the reservation. He lives at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

[goldstategop]

If AQ terrorists have in fact smuggled in nuclear weapons through Mexico, we're sitting on a time bomb. Or we will unless we get serious about border enforcement. We can lose the war right here at home. Think of several million American dead and our economy brought to a virtual standstill. If that doesn't concentrate minds on the issue at hand, I don't know what will. We have to get our act together.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

[trubluolyguy]

Plug the leak.



Bail the dirty water.



Go from there. Impeachment at this point is an asinine idea. However, a particularly brutal mass crime wave or a gigantic terrorist attack on par with 9-11 or (God forbid) worse...that is proven to have come over the southern border? I'll be marching in the streets of D.C. to have every last politician in office that has REFUSED to protect us removed from office. Forcibly if necessary.

[blondee123]

That has been my sore spot about Bush all along, I voted for him both times, trusted he'd do the right thing about illegals & the border, but he hasn't.

[Map Kernow]

I know the moonbat Left is also pushing this.

Who cares? They want to do it because he's Republican. As long as GW is defending America and enforcing the laws and the Constitution, they don't stand a chance. But since he's NOT enforcing the laws or defending the borders...

Look, was Clinton impeached for getting his pole waxed, or because he knowingly committed perjury in a court proceeding? HE BROKE THE LAW---and I couldn't STAND to hear liberals yammer on at the time about how Republicans just wanted to get him for having sex in the White House. Same thing with Bush---I have no problem with him being a Republican because I'm registered as one myself, and I voted for him in 2000. But I'm not going to let my party registration stand in the way of holding him to account for not enforcing the laws he SWORE he would uphold, and not defending the borders he MUST DEFEND IN A TIME OF WAR. No excuses, no equivocation, no partisanship can stand in the way of his accountability for those two things.

[de Buillion]

"Pat Buchanan and Josef Farah are out of their friggin minds. The best thing Pat Bushanan could do is place a hand gun in his mouth and en end his miserable existence. Pat could take one for his Country, and so should Uncle Joe Farah "

This is about the most enlightening, logical, intellectual, and critically reasoned opinion that I have ever been blessed to read. It ranks up there with the genius reply #2, by zarf. Very substantial. (Sarcasm off).

[MJY1288]

I'm not burying my head, this is a problem that was not created by this President and won't be solved by this one.... Simply because it's near impossible to seal our borders without deploying 3/4 of a million troops on the border and I doubt that would do much to end the illegal crossings. Mention a National ID card to the people here calling for Bush to be impeached and see how long it is before you are called a Nazi. We have to have a way of identifying everyone who makes a purchase here in the United States before we could ever think about stopping the flow of illegals.

Impeaching President Bush over this issue is simply NUTS

[MJY1288]

I'm glad you enjoyed, Maybe even as much as I enjoyed reading this pathetic piece by the loon Farah, Good Night and join Cibdy Sheehan's call for impeachment, you'll be welcomed with open arms

[Racehorse]

Impeachment at this point is an asinine idea.

Not to mention an unproductive distraction.  All the fun we had with Bill and what's-her-name's stained dress might have been better spent pressing Congress to act.

Why wait on George to propose doing the right thing when Congress can do the right thing?

Then, should Bush fail or refuse to be the executive, impeach him.

[Cobra64]

We both voted for Bush and had such high hopes but feel he has willfully failed us on this all important issue.

Ditto that. As the most conservative guy that I know, I am VERY ashamed of W's lack of attention on this issue. He is a good war President, but his domestic polices are... more like Carter, Clinton. I.E.: PATHETIC.

Now, before I get flamed, I stumped with Ronnie in 1964 for Barry AuH20. So I am an Ultra-Right-Wing Conservative. However, I do not understand W's approach on the ILLegal immigrant issue. If they (the ILLegals) are here ILLegally, then they sould be deported.

Can someone please explain W's logic to me?

[Terpfen]

Far-out Farah strikes again!

If Bush should be impeached for his stance on illegal immigration, Reagan should have been as well.

[Map Kernow]

Why wait on George to propose doing the right thing when Congress can do the right thing?

Then, should Bush fail or refuse to be the executive, impeach him.

What is it you would have Congress do? Re-affirm existing immigration law? Make illegal entry even more illegal? Pass a resolution that the executive branch should enforce the immigration law? That the Commander-in-Chief should use the armed forces of the United States to prevent and repel invasion by illegal entrants?

[MJY1288]

And how many times did you call for Slick Willy's Impeachment when the same or even more were crossing the border?

You're a tool, my friend. The millions that have been crossing the border every year for the last 50 are only reported about when a Republican is in the White House. Go take a look at how much money has been spent on the border since 2001 and compare that against the last 5 presidents and get back to me.....

Good Night, I'm off to bed

[Grut]

Why wait on George to propose doing the right thing when Congress can do the right thing?

Congress? Act? Congress isn't for doing things....

[Cougar66]

no one will ever take care of the border. as for impeachment thats a joke. Buchie is as nuts as the libs. Now I know why I always cringe when I see or hear him.

[Map Kernow]

If Bush should be impeached for his stance on illegal immigration, Reagan should have been as well.

You mean the Reagan that said, "This country has lost control of its borders. And no country can sustain that kind of position"---that Reagan? Got even a quote from GW to the same effect?