Skip to comments.
WMD threat could spark American nuclear strike
Times Online ^
| September 12, 2005
| Giles Whittell
Posted on 09/12/2005 3:51:50 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
2
posted on
09/12/2005 3:52:54 PM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Your papers please.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
A PRESIDENT of the United States would be able to launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes against enemies planning to use weapons of mass destruction under a revised nuclear operations doctrine to be signed in the next few weeks. Perhaps those terrorist a-holes shouldn't f' with then eh?
3
posted on
09/12/2005 3:54:20 PM PDT
by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Well SHIAAT wasnt 9/11 enough of a strike to authorize such response? I am sick of our panty waist politicians.
To: michigander
f' with us then eh?
5
posted on
09/12/2005 3:55:32 PM PDT
by
michigander
(The Constitution only guarantees the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.)
To: partyrepub
The Tancredo Doctrine?
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
See that is why i like him he is saying what i been thinking for years since 9/11. Let the terrorist reap what they sow.
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
8
posted on
09/12/2005 4:02:19 PM PDT
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: partyrepub
Well SHIAAT wasnt 9/11 enough of a strike to authorize such response?Actually, I think the conventional strike against Afghanistan, who shielded Bin Laden, was appropriate.
There's the problem of who really did it (yeah it was the Saudis, but not directly, and we need their oil). I wouldn't go nuke unless we were either nuked or badly bio-ed ourselves. In that case, I'd take out all of the usual suspects, of course, because I would just "settle all family accounts" (Godfather I).
Bad as 9/11 was, I wouldn't have used nukes. It would have set the whole world against us--not just the Muzzies. But, given a nuke here, all bets would be off.
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
The Tancredo Doctrine?...KEWL! LOL!..make the Terrorists/Liberals sweat.
10
posted on
09/12/2005 4:09:34 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Now raise that to total destruction of the muslime world in case of a WMD attack to make 'em really squirm. But I'll bet the Libs will fight this more than the terrorists themselves.
11
posted on
09/12/2005 4:12:45 PM PDT
by
varyouga
(Reformed Kerry voter (I know, I'm a frickin' idiot))
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Sure sounds like it. Worked during the Cold War. I suspect that it will work now too.
Bet that 100% of terrorists in the world today rely on countries and/or governments for their existence. Those governments look the other way, or indirectly or directly support them. So, threaten those governments with retaliation of the worst kind and problem solved. It is laughable to listen to the "civilized" respond with shock when Tancredo was taken out of context. All the while they probably have terrorists living in their country.
Kicking Afghanistan's and Iraq's a$$ was a demonstration to the world that we can and will defend ourselves in the worst way if necessary. Beware!
12
posted on
09/12/2005 4:12:54 PM PDT
by
dhs12345
(w)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
13
posted on
09/12/2005 4:14:02 PM PDT
by
Trajan88
(www.bullittclub.com)
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
14
posted on
09/12/2005 4:16:52 PM PDT
by
airborne
To: Pearls Before Swine
But, given a nuke here, all bets would be off.Suppose a dirty bomb goes off in an American city...who do we nuke?
15
posted on
09/12/2005 4:21:03 PM PDT
by
evad
( PC KILLS--NOLA is just the latest example)
To: evad
16
posted on
09/12/2005 4:28:09 PM PDT
by
Archon of the East
("universal executive power of the law of nature")
To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
All you gotta do is
put your mind to it
knuckle down, buckle down
do it do it do it!
To: Archon of the East
or France. Same difference.
18
posted on
09/12/2005 4:41:11 PM PDT
by
TeddyCon
To: evad
Start with Mecca and Medina. Then make Syria go away, just because. If we see anybody celebrating on television, they're next, thus allowing us to finally give France what they deserve. ;)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Well SHIAAT wasnt 9/11 enough of a strike to authorize such response?First, I think that should be, "Well, Shi'ite! Wasn't 9/11 enough of a strike to authorize such response?
There's the problem of who really did it...
Maybe to civilized nations there is, but we are dealing with uncivilized terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. If I remember the scenes from the Palestinian camps to 9/11 correctly, we know they sympathize with and are willing to support bint Ladin. If we simply haul out some neutron bombs and use them on the Palestinian Authority and Mekkah and Medina, the problem will go away fast. My thinking is 1,000,000 dead Sheetheaded goatf'ers dead in such a preemptive attack would only qualify as "a good start".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson