Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Witness: 'Intelligent Design' doesn't qualify as science [Day 4 of trial in Dover, PA]
Sioux City Journal ^ | 29 September 2005 | Staff

Posted on 09/29/2005 3:36:00 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 561 next last
To: general_re

Here's the complete fossel record.

http://www.mainetoday.com/elections/2004/news/040609senate20.shtml


101 posted on 09/29/2005 6:59:15 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

OK, Nathan. If you are going to quote long passages from web sites, please reference the web site. It is obvious that you did not write the post yourself, so you need to tell us where you got this text. To do otherwise is to plagiarize.

So, which web site did you copy and paste that from?


102 posted on 09/29/2005 7:00:23 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Oh, so because this person runs a lab, means they have no other interests or do any other research?

Just because you can't find everything on google doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Strange though, I have also checked out some kooky evolutionists that have appeared on lists, and I find half don't even have a doctorate. So, I guess it works both ways.
103 posted on 09/29/2005 7:01:32 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

See my post 83. :-)


104 posted on 09/29/2005 7:01:46 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

It's classic Hovindia, or more precisely, one of Dr. Dino's stable of authors:

http://www.drdino.com/articles.php?spec=79


105 posted on 09/29/2005 7:04:21 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Dang, beat me to it ;)


106 posted on 09/29/2005 7:04:49 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer; Nathan Zachary

Thanks. I saw it after I posted. Still, I was hoping that Nathan would attribute his own copy and paste jobs. That's only honest, I'd think.

I mean, it's obvious to me that someone who can't spell "fossil" did not write a pseudo-scientific paper, but he should at least give credit where credit is due, don't you think?


107 posted on 09/29/2005 7:04:56 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
You know what? Go preach the spelling crap to someone else. I'm not your student, you're not a teacher, and I really don't care if I make spelling mistakes.

Spelling has nothing to do with people taking you seriously, and if it matters to small minded people, it just don't matter to me what they think.

108 posted on 09/29/2005 7:05:24 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Maybe, but there are biologists publishing original research supporting evolution, and none publishing original research supporting ID.

Check out the reason the Discovery Institute isn't particilating on the trial. Read what they have to say about the state of ID research.


109 posted on 09/29/2005 7:07:28 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

"You know what? Go preach the spelling crap to someone else. I'm not your student, you're not a teacher, and I really don't care if I make spelling mistakes. "

OK. It was just a suggestion, anyhow. Of course you're free to take it or not take it. I just find that folks who don't take the time to try to spell correctly on Free Republic get taken less seriously than those who do.

It's entirely up to you, Nathan. I do wish you'd provide links to the sources of your longer screeds, though, so I could visit the web site from which you copied them. It would make life much easier for me. I wouldn't have to use Google to find where you got your information.


110 posted on 09/29/2005 7:08:06 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Spelling has nothing to do with people taking you seriously, and if it matters to small minded people, it just don't matter to me what they think.

The point is that you're making a claim about a specific subject -- fossils -- yet you consistently spell the name of the subject incorrectly. Not being able to spell the very name of your subject suggests very strongly that you haven't actually done any research on the subject, because if you had you would certainly have come across innumerable instances of the word spelled correctly. If there is a strong indication that you haven't actually researched the subject, then it throws into question any claim that you make about the subject.

So, yes, in this case your misspelling affects your credibility in a very real and fundamental way. Whining about spelling flames does not make the implications that you haven't done any actual research go away.
111 posted on 09/29/2005 7:10:51 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Mason JM, Drummond MF, Bosanquet AG, Sheldon TA. "The Disc assay: a cost-effective guide to treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia?" The guy (Bosanquet) runs a routine medical lab that test the effectiveness of cancer drugs on tumor samples. Legitimate stuff, but hardly original research related to evolution.

Middle author too. It usually means he wasn't the guy directing the research, and he wasn't the guy leading the research. If I have a grad. student who collects some data for a project, and analyzes it, but the major work was done by someone else, I usually include them as a middle author.

112 posted on 09/29/2005 7:11:23 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Don't you suppose there's a reason the Dr. Dino stuff you plagiarized isn't being used in court? It is a Republican judge.
113 posted on 09/29/2005 7:11:30 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: applpie
Please explain how the scientific method can be applied to claims of intelligent design. Explain what intelligent design predicts and give a hypothetical observation that would falsify intelligent design.

There is so much intelligence and information embedded in every single atom, only a fool, once they have actually looked at it with an open mind, could dismiss design over random chance and absolutely improbable statistics of evolution.

1) This is an argument from incredulity, a logical fallacy.

2) Evolution says nothing whatsoever regarding the origin of atoms.
114 posted on 09/29/2005 7:13:17 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Your statement is backwards. The evidence supports ID

Ok. I'll play along. Let's pretend you are right, that there is no evidence supporting evolution. Now, in your words, "list the evidence" supporting ID.

115 posted on 09/29/2005 7:15:46 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
whatsoever regarding the origin of atoms

Nor do most of the particle physicists I know buy into ID.

116 posted on 09/29/2005 7:16:01 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer (Senior member of Darwin Central)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
PH, you might like this one for your list -o- links.

I like it. I'll add it. Thanks.

117 posted on 09/29/2005 7:16:11 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Disclaimer -- this information may be legally false in Kansas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
He does have papers with his name on them as author, and he does run a hospital affiliated lab. It looks like routine, off the shelf stuff to me. I don't see any interest in theory. I see no reason why a flat earther couldn't build components for NASA. Compartmentalization.
118 posted on 09/29/2005 7:17:00 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Taxonomy, Transitional Forms, and the Fossil Record.

wild guesses, grouping >fossals< that don't belong together prove nothing. Many of these mistakes have been discovered. The Hobbit bones is in reference to what was an alleged new species of human which evolutionists named Homo floresiensis which turned out to be the remains of an ordinary sickly kid, a modern human who had a brain-shrinking disorder called microcephaly. Much hoopla was made about this discovery, which is yet another of a long list of frauds.

119 posted on 09/29/2005 7:20:23 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past; ohioWfan; Tribune7; Tolkien; GrandEagle; Right in Wisconsin; Dataman; ..
This is all this thread is...

No interest in discussion over the trial...just a chance to feel evo good.


Revelation 4:11Intelligent Design
See my profile for info

120 posted on 09/29/2005 7:21:32 AM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 561 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson