Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miers Nomination Jilts Pro-Lifers, Instead of ‘Jolt’ to Supreme Court Status Quo
The American View ^ | October 2005 | Stephen G. Peroutka

Posted on 10/10/2005 9:17:03 AM PDT by SmartCitizen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Columbine
...and spent the girl's SS checks from her dead father.

Post the exact portion of the story where it says they spent the money on anything but the daughters (which is illegal!), or shut your slanderous mouth.

41 posted on 10/10/2005 12:16:06 PM PDT by SmartCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SmartCitizen

I told you I beleive it is a life. Unfortunately our culture has no consensus on that.

Try answering my question: do you want an activist judge or not?


42 posted on 10/10/2005 12:18:20 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
I told you I beleive it is a life. Unfortunately our culture has no consensus on that.

Fortunately, moral truth isn't decided by the "culture" - moral truths have already been established by a transcendant power. So, I don't give a flip what the sick and dying culture says. What we need is leadership, not someone who says that the country "isn't ready" to end abortion. That's not leadership. Leaders do the right thing regardless of majority opinion. Harry Blackmun was a nefarious blackguard but he was a leader in the sense that he didn't care what Americans thought of the Roe decision.

43 posted on 10/10/2005 12:23:50 PM PDT by SmartCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SmartCitizen
Post the exact portion of the story where it says they spent the money on anything but the daughters (which is illegal!), or shut your slanderous mouth.

Oh, is this a threat from a morally superior Peroutka supporter?

Get a grip.

44 posted on 10/10/2005 12:31:32 PM PDT by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SmartCitizen

So do you dislike the other side's activist judges, and prefer ones you agree with?


45 posted on 10/10/2005 12:42:32 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Columbine
Someone else's take outside a Peroutka...... 3rd parties can only wish.. Where do you all sit?.... The Herd or the navel gazers?.....

Harriet Miers, Conservative

At the risk of drawing the undying enmity of The Herd, I'm going to state categorically that conservatism is sitting pretty at this hour. That's because Harry Reid has just been hosed – and he doesn't even know it.

The navel gazers are nabobing about another Souter. That's silly. The Court will almost certainly move to the right as a result of the nomination and confirmation of Harriet Miers.


46 posted on 10/10/2005 1:28:32 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Columbine; SmartCitizen

Columbine, disregard my post I just made to you as it was meant for the 'smart citizen' fellar/woman.


47 posted on 10/10/2005 1:31:41 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: deport
At least Peroutka pledges to honor his OATH to the Constitution, which is more than can be said for Bush and the Republican Congress. At least Peroutka places stopping genocide of the unborn as top priority, instead of relegating it to his B list like Bush does. At least Peroutka believes as our founding father beileved when it comes to government's role in our lives whereas Bush can't grow the government fast enough. At least Peroutka pledges to stop the invasion of illegal immigrants - something Bush and the GOP Congress refuse to do.

Finally, at least Peroutka is PROUDLY AND UNASHAMEDLY PRO-LIFE and will nominate an unambigous pro-life judge and FIGHT for that nomination - he doesn't try to hide it and down-play it and appease the liberals like Bush has done his entire tenure.

48 posted on 10/10/2005 3:32:07 PM PDT by SmartCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Columbine

I don't like slanderous lies. You bush-bots remind me of the brownshirts.


49 posted on 10/10/2005 3:33:08 PM PDT by SmartCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SmartCitizen

Finally, at least Peroutka is PROUDLY AND UNASHAMEDLY PRO-LIFE and will nominate an unambigous pro-life judge



Wrong........ Peroutka will never nominate a judge to any federal court as he has first got to be elected President. Now tell me how many votes that fellar got in the Electoral College this last time around...... Was it zero?

Navel gazers and The Herd .. LOL


50 posted on 10/10/2005 3:37:33 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SmartCitizen

Hey, bud.

Your one month membership here along with your comments in this thread smells of troll.

Buzz off and kiss Peroutka's foot.


51 posted on 10/10/2005 4:27:56 PM PDT by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: deport
Wrong........ Peroutka will never nominate a judge to any federal court as he has first got to be elected President. Now tell me how many votes that fellar got in the Electoral College this last time around...... Was it zero?

Winning isn't everything, especially when the winner is a few bricks short of a full load in the leadership department. All that shows is that most Americans were fooled into voting for the lesser of two evils. Let's see if the GOP can keep the wool over their eyes next time around.

52 posted on 10/10/2005 6:30:25 PM PDT by SmartCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SmartCitizen
You are one sorry loser.....Aren't you...LOL
53 posted on 10/10/2005 6:36:06 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SmartCitizen

Winning isn't everything,



LOL......... Maybe not in your world madam, but now tell me exactly how many federal judicial appointments will the following non winners such as Kerry, Peroutka, Buchanan, etc. etc. make between now and the election of 2008? Seems that is the prize that all would aspire to.


54 posted on 10/10/2005 6:54:25 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: deport
Bill Clinton won the vote two elections in a row. Proof that winning isn't everything. The sheeple can be fooled into electing anyone. It certainly has nothing to do with how effective a man and leader the winner is.

Many well-known and solid conservatives are revolting over Bush's stupid pick for the Court. What Bush has shown by this pick is that he has no stomach for a fight with liberals. He would rather suck up to them than fight them and his record proves it. Who's the loser?

55 posted on 10/11/2005 5:43:29 AM PDT by SmartCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SmartCitizen

Who's the loser?



Madam, it's you 3rd party types as you have no seat at the table no matter who wins. You are on the outside looking in whether it's a Republican or Democrat in office. You don't have the numbers to win the election thus you can't make the policy decisions, select the judges, etc. etc. The majority of Americans don't reside among the fringe elements.




The sheeple can be fooled into electing anyone. ...



Well so far they haven't been fooled into electing people like Peroutka or the other 3rd party types, now have they. I think they are just a little more smarter than you give them credit for. So maybe you all best get your 'fooling apapratus' in gear if'n you really won't to win, reckon? Heck Perot fooled some 20% of the voters and didn't get the first of 270 EC votes needed to win.

Smell the roses...... Now you have a good day as I'm finished with this thread.


56 posted on 10/11/2005 7:36:57 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: deport
Well so far they haven't been fooled into electing people like Peroutka or the other 3rd party types, now have they.

No, they were fooled into thinking G.W. Bush was a conservative. Now, many are seeing they've been duped because Bush is a faux conservative. On the other hand, if they had voted Peroutka, they would have got the man that they thought they voted for in Bush. Just think if all of the Christian leaders had pushed Peroutka instead of Bush - that alone is good for 20% of the vote.

The GOP is going to die a slow political death as it stands for nothing these days. Go ahead and root for your logo - that's all it is - an empty logo.

Now that I have had the last word, good day yourself.

57 posted on 10/11/2005 10:38:32 AM PDT by SmartCitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson