Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ATTN JUANITA BROADDRICK -- Apparently Susan Estrich thinks you are a liar
Hannity show | 10-11-05 | dfu

Posted on 10/11/2005 2:42:10 PM PDT by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last
To: skikvt
Good Lord... Who or what could possibly rape this thing?

Room temperature liver has more appeal.

101 posted on 10/22/2005 1:56:06 PM PDT by jslade (.Go away Wilma. (Seminole Cty. FL))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"...I'm glad you got your daughter back. Try to learn more about what goes on in a woman's mind after being raped."

Obviously you believe that Yasotay's ex falsely accused him of rape. It follows, logically, that women are quite capable of lying about this. Yes, SOME women, for whatever reason, will resort to this charge. I believe that. In most cases, they do not need 67 senators to believe them.

In the particular case of Broderick, you can SPECULATE as to why she kept quiet..."67 senators would have NEVER voted to convict."

How does that explain why other women keep quiet about rape when no member of any government is involved?

To say I have no admiration for Bill Clinton (and his wife) is putting it in the kindest way possible for me. I have no problem believing he is/was a womanizer. Acknowledging that, I don't know that it is absolutely true that he raped Juanita Broderick. If anyone else can prove that, I'm listening. And...why the advice to Yasotay to "learn more about what goes on in a woman's mind afat being raped." What's the connection? You apparently agree with him so why do you advise him to learn more about it?

I may have missed your point here and admit I'm confused as to your message.

102 posted on 10/22/2005 8:13:17 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: IIntense
In his previous posts (including other threads), he has shown that he was completely clueless about the history of the Broaddick case. I took him for his word about his ex-wife. I don't know what happened with him.

He went out of his way to attack Broaddrick on this and other threads, and relate his own claimed bad experience. Fine, but he needs to at least know what he is talking about here. He doesn't.

103 posted on 10/22/2005 8:27:00 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Sorry. You know more about this poster than I do. I should have butted out. Thanks for being nice about it.


104 posted on 10/23/2005 1:40:58 PM PDT by IIntense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: IIntense

No problem. I had asked him to start his own thread and say whatever he wanted to about Broaddrick there. He just cannot resist putting crap on my threads. It has become irritating.


105 posted on 10/23/2005 1:53:43 PM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson