Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Cuban's Response to Me About Terror Film
Mark Cuban | October 15, 2005 | Hildy

Posted on 10/15/2005 6:10:31 PM PDT by Hildy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
You're right, but at least one of his errors wasn't a simple typos: "cowardness" for cowardice.

I Love This Place!!!

41 posted on 10/15/2005 11:06:43 PM PDT by bobbyd (Damn, I've been tagged.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: beckett

How crazy are you? Have you seen the movie...did you read what he said? All I have to say is ... wow. if if if...


42 posted on 10/15/2005 11:07:54 PM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Edmund Dante
I saw the movie last week and it was a good movie and certainly did not support terrorism as some nitwit said in the press.

I think that needs to be restated.

43 posted on 10/15/2005 11:10:41 PM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Can we authenticate these messages? Do we know he wrote them? Would an educated man write "cowardness" for cowardice, or "should" for showed?


44 posted on 10/15/2005 11:11:40 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Believe me, he wrote it. You'll just have to take my word for it.


45 posted on 10/15/2005 11:13:24 PM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

If you're vouching for it, I'll accept that. I guess becoming a billionaire requires a "big picture" approach, rather than a schlub like me who sweats the small stuff. ;O)


46 posted on 10/15/2005 11:14:55 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

You said it, not me. :))


47 posted on 10/15/2005 11:16:39 PM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Schlussel:
Then, he is called several obscene names and violently nabbed by American agents. We next see secular, innocent Hassan in a dark Karachi, Pakistan dungeon--questioned, tortured, and mutilated. Throughout the film we are treated to views of his various ugly scars and his flashbacks of the torture.

I really doubt Schlussel is lying. Perhaps you think she is. Knock yourself out.

A main character subjected to torture speaks volumes about the the dramatist's intention in establishing audience sympathy. These tricks are as old as Hollywood, indeed, as old as Greek tragedy.

48 posted on 10/15/2005 11:17:16 PM PDT by beckett (Amor Fati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: beckett

See post #29..


49 posted on 10/15/2005 11:21:16 PM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Thanks for clarifying and I had a feeling Debbie was off base. I don't always agree with Mark Cuban but he is not stupid. He understands where his "bread is buttered." Dallas is a very conservative town and he could not afford to make a pro-terrorist or pro-Islam movie.


50 posted on 10/16/2005 6:45:30 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beckett; Hildy
If you go to the landmark cinema's website, and watch the "extended" trailer, which appears to be the first 8 minutes of the movie, you can see for yourself how Hassan is getting his motivation.

Website is here:

http://movies.aol.com/movie/main.adp?mid=23490

Schlussel does have a point here.

51 posted on 10/16/2005 6:48:18 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jalapeno

You're going to judge an entire movie by an 8 minute trailer?


52 posted on 10/16/2005 6:56:07 AM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
You're going to judge an entire movie by an 8 minute trailer?

No, you are missing the point. The point is that Hassan is the central character. He is the one we observe through the life of the film...and his motivation to take his actions, whatever they are, are generated on false pretenses, that he was kidnapped and tortured by Americans (through a Paki proxy).

One of Schlussell's points is that this false pretense is not a good basis for the action in the film. And I think this is a valid point. Instead, it tries to plan the age old argument of "America made them through America's actions" as opposed to the jihadists making themselves through a corrupt culture and taking on a violent religious POV.

The producers of the film seem to have the mantra "we must know our enemy", but Hassan's motivator is not the motivator of our enemy, though they would love for it to truly be.

I do plan to go see it, for it did look like the acting was credible, and the subject matter disturbing enough to provoke thought, but based on what I am seeing as indicators for Hassan's driving force, I would hope people would acknowledge it as flawed, for I do believe it is.

53 posted on 10/16/2005 7:11:19 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I don't think his point of view has to do with money. Did you read his passionate response. He wrote me after and said he picked up the distribution rights to this movie:

VOICES OF IRAQ

He said he picked it up after nobody else would. It looks pretty good but I've never heard of it, have you? Why do you think that is?

54 posted on 10/16/2005 7:16:21 AM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Bttt


55 posted on 10/16/2005 9:36:31 AM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
I went and saw this today, and I would say it is not a sympathetic movie to terrorism.

However, it does use the kidnapping/torture angle introduced as his motivation. And at several moments in the film he flashes back to this event to fuel himself.

It really is a shame, because there are also scenes which indicate his interpretation of Islam is a motivator. But this is overshadowed by the vindictive element. It only begins to explore what I think should have been examined deeper.

So I think the writers did themselves a disservice with the kinapping/torture part, because in the end it really did not add to the plot, and it made the character less realistic, less believable. And it obviously points to a blame American syndrome, when there are more complex issue I would have wnated it to explore. One can only question why...

I would recommend it to all as an interesting film. I don't think it is going to convince anyone to go blow themselves up.

56 posted on 10/16/2005 11:13:22 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jalapeno

Thanks, I'm going to send your post to Mark. Being you're one of the few who actually SAW the movie, it means the most.


57 posted on 10/16/2005 12:18:15 PM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Good for you!

I generally find Debbie to be spot on, and Mark Cuban is a jackass, so I'd have to see the film to know for sure.

58 posted on 10/16/2005 3:12:13 PM PDT by veronica ("clowns clones clowns/ it's raining clowns/snarling FR obsessed clones/ claws bared clowns"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

one more time...


59 posted on 10/16/2005 7:46:03 PM PDT by Hildy ( liberals cannot change the present, and cannot effect the future, so they MUST relive the past...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson