Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FITZGERALD DOCUMENTS RELEASED
US Dept. of Justice | oct. 28, 2005 | Patrick Fitzgerald

Posted on 10/28/2005 10:14:53 AM PDT by blogblogginaway

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1028051plame1.html


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialeak; doj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: blogblogginaway

21 posted on 10/28/2005 10:23:42 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chicos_Bail_Bonds

Ya gotta love The Smoking Gun.


22 posted on 10/28/2005 10:23:58 AM PDT by IGOTMINE (Front Sight. Press. Follow Through. It's a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: okie01

OK, Libby used "Valerie Wilson"

Who told Miller "F/Plame?"


23 posted on 10/28/2005 10:24:24 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: half-cajun
Just because her status was classified, does not mean she was covert. This is getting ridiculous. What has this guy been doing for 2 years?


Posting on DU
24 posted on 10/28/2005 10:24:48 AM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Was Wilson or Plame ever questioned under oath about this as to their actions regaring this whole matter?


25 posted on 10/28/2005 10:25:16 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog

"Recently Wilson spoke at SF State and was asked by many of the numbskulls there to run for political office. His answer says much about him and our intelligence community’s health. He said he’d had, “too many wives and taken too many drugs. And, yes. I did inhale.” He spoke about being a child of the sixties, being anti-war and the works."-October 24, 2005

http://www.opinioneditorials.com/freedomwriters/rhawkins_20051024.html


26 posted on 10/28/2005 10:25:57 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

It's pretty bad when even some of the folks over at DU are going WTF?


27 posted on 10/28/2005 10:26:18 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog

Me too.


28 posted on 10/28/2005 10:27:21 AM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
The top deputy to the Vice President is charged with perjury and obstruction of justice and thats 'nothing'?

They could charge him with murder and it wouldn't be true either.

Look, I take your point: but he's innocent until proven guilty.

29 posted on 10/28/2005 10:27:43 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Scooter needs to hire a kick ass Lawyer and go after this buffoon! This is pure crap!
How tough would it be to play whackaprosecutor using Fitzpatrick's head as a ball, if you are a top notch lawyer that is?


30 posted on 10/28/2005 10:28:39 AM PDT by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mykpfsu
Its basically Libby's word against Russert, Cooper and Miller. That seems to be what the documents say.

But what we don't know is if there are other witnesses who have testified to the grand jury that back up the reporters' versions. A whole lot of presidential and vice presidential aides were called before the grand jury. Some of them may have been in the room when Libby was talking on the phone and gave testimony about what he said that differs from Libby's own testimony. Or they may have testified about their conversations with Libby that differ from what Libby told the grand jury. Finally, what if some of the conversations Libby had with reporters and other aides were taped! I imagine that would be some pretty solid evidence should it come to "he said/she said."
31 posted on 10/28/2005 10:28:46 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
So Fitz puts something into his document that is both clearly and demonstratably wrong, and has nothing directly to do with the indictment.

Smells like he's covering up not going after Miller for who she was actually covering for.

32 posted on 10/28/2005 10:28:57 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
Posting on DU

Effin amazin'....considering the source URL.

33 posted on 10/28/2005 10:29:04 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (If you decide to kick the tiger in the ass...you'd better be prepared to deal with the teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget

What's that supposed to mean?


34 posted on 10/28/2005 10:29:42 AM PDT by half-cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: acapesket
I'm sure there are plenty of great lawyers wanting Libby's case because it would give them immortality in history and of course later their own books on the matter.
35 posted on 10/28/2005 10:30:50 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
They got nothing on the underlying crime. They got an "entrapment" indictment which is a whole different kettle of fish. The Special Counsel had to manufacture a crime to justify the expenditure of several million dollars investigating a non-event.

("Denny Crane: Gun Control? For Communists. She's a liberal. Can't hunt.")

36 posted on 10/28/2005 10:31:19 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Well, we're about to find out if this President and this Administration is willing to fight this fight.

The gauntlet has been thrown down. I have my doubts as to whether they have the will to make a stand. We shall see.

IMHO, this nation's government is at a crossroads.


37 posted on 10/28/2005 10:31:20 AM PDT by airborne (Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSane
it's the same charge we got Clinton on.

The difference is that Clinton was guilty.

38 posted on 10/28/2005 10:31:21 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

My money is on that this is gonna plead out.

No way jury wouldn't convict if you have a parade of reporters marching in all with the same story. Plus, they all protected the source until Libby let them off the hook for source secrecy (probably under obstruction charges pressure from Fitz - or bad advice from counsel). Oh, and that's not to mention the paragraph that obviously comes from the VP himself re: when he told Libby that Plame worked CIA in counterproliferation or whatever it was.


By the way, Fitzgerald is squeaky clean, and the other investigators - one is this pencil-neck geek looking guy who seems nice and one or two younger women that also seemed nice. I for one don't believe these were a bunch of hacks and/or operatives running the show.

The old line is you can indict a ham sandwich is apropos here, and that being said, the fact that they did not indict him for more than this is a testament to the prosecutors' evenhandedness, I hate to say it.

In fact, I think faced with the information in that indictment, any one of us who had Fitz's job would have had to indict Libby for this. Remember the standard at indictment stage is Probable Cause. Far far FAR cry from reasonable doubt.


39 posted on 10/28/2005 10:31:27 AM PDT by Julliardsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: acapesket

Rush mentioned Oliver North's attorney, (Brendan Sullivan?).



40 posted on 10/28/2005 10:31:32 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson