Skip to comments.
Fox News Hit with Sex Bias Suit
newsmax.com ^
Posted on 11/08/2005 7:12:48 AM PST by rs79bm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: rs79bm
I watch Fox a lot and don't ever remember anyone by that name. Does anyone have a photo? I sure can't remember her.
To: rs79bm
So, now telling someone to "be a man" is a denigration or slur?............
22
posted on
11/08/2005 7:46:40 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Whatever happened to formulas 1 through 408?.........)
To: rs79bm
The EEOC suit charged that a Fox vice president "routinely used gross obscenities and vulgarities when describing women or their body parts," Are they sure it wasn't really Bill O'Reilly? Sounds like his MO.
23
posted on
11/08/2005 7:46:59 AM PST
by
Bommer
(TEXANS - VOTE NOV 8TH FOR PROPOSITION 2 - THE MARRIAGE PROTECTION AMENDMENT)
To: cubreporter
I did a quick search and she was a promotional and/or marketing director of some sort. I don't have any more information. I don't think she ever made it on air, if that's what your wondering.
24
posted on
11/08/2005 7:48:39 AM PST
by
rs79bm
To: rs79bm
Beware the molemen or molewomen......wake up FOX!
25
posted on
11/08/2005 7:48:51 AM PST
by
add925
(The Left = Xenophobes in Denial)
To: Williams
"..and anchor eye candy."24-7
26
posted on
11/08/2005 7:53:20 AM PST
by
Designer
(Just a nit-pick'n and chagrin'n)
To: add925
>The lawsuit was filed in Manhattan's Federal District Court by the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Did they file a suit
against the Clinton White House
on behalf of all
the gals who worked there
who didn't get treated cool
like Monica did?
To: wvobiwan
More than likely... lawyers from CNN & MSNBC got ahold of her and filled her head with visions of sugarplums.
28
posted on
11/08/2005 7:54:19 AM PST
by
johnny7
(“What now? Let me tell you what now.”)
To: rs79bm
The EEOC suit charged that a Fox vice president "routinely used gross obscenities and vulgarities when describing women or their body parts," language that it says the executive "did not use with male employees." Sounds like a guy saying guy stuff to me.
29
posted on
11/08/2005 7:56:01 AM PST
by
stacytec
(Nihilism, destorying an "ism" near you!)
To: Williams
That airhead - Juliette Huddy makes your point.
30
posted on
11/08/2005 7:56:39 AM PST
by
Churchillspirit
(Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
To: blaquebyrd
"It's a federal law suit. Why would the Bush Administration go after Fox?"
The federal government is a huge entity made up of many agencies that are still headed by partisans. One thing to remember about CLinton is that he committed one of the largest partisan purges in US history...which included the so-called DA Massacre that replaced all the US Attorneys. Unless Bush replaced these people, (which I don't recall him doing) these federal prosecutors, combined with Clinton-appointed federal judges, means Republicans aren't even safe from partisans in the DOJ.
31
posted on
11/08/2005 7:57:43 AM PST
by
cwb
(Liberalism is the opiate of the *asses)
To: Iowa Granny
Yes, that's the agreement most of us accept when we are employed. And that goes both ways. The employee can quit when they like as well, 'for no reason'.
What I do truly find humorous though, is how teachers think they should be different. Tenure? You've got to be kiddin me.
To: rs79bm
yes, that's what I was wondering because her name sure didn't ring a bell.
To: Churchillspirit
I wasn't really complaining, although on an intellectual level it is frivolus to be featuring short skirts. I feel Kiran Chetry is about as fine as they get, but I don't see her get much write up. I would post her pic but I don't know how.
34
posted on
11/08/2005 8:03:40 AM PST
by
Williams
To: Bommer
Are they sure it wasn't really Bill O'Reilly? Sounds like his MO. my first thought also
To: cubreporter
Ok, her official title:
Kim Weiler
Fox News Channel
Promotions & Advertising
1211 Avenue of the Americas
18th Floor
New York, NY 10036
36
posted on
11/08/2005 8:04:06 AM PST
by
rs79bm
To: rs79bm
Did Rita Crosby ever allege any of this???
37
posted on
11/08/2005 8:04:48 AM PST
by
stm
To: rs79bm
O'Reilly yelling "IT WASN'T ME" was heard as far away as nearby New Jersey and Delaware.
38
posted on
11/08/2005 8:05:53 AM PST
by
Rebelbase
(Food stamps, section-8, State paid Child support, etc. pay more than the min. wage.)
To: Williams
I feel Kiran Chetry is about as fine as they get, but I don't see her get much write up. I would post her pic but I don't know how.
OK, I do.
39
posted on
11/08/2005 8:06:00 AM PST
by
rs79bm
To: Williams
I feel Kiran Chetry is about as fine as they get, but I don't see her get much write up. I agree.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson