Skip to comments.
Kansas Prof. Apologizes for E-Mail [referred to religious conservatives as "fundies" ....]
Yahoo ^
Posted on 11/29/2005 9:31:13 AM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 721-723 next last
kook.....
To: PatrickHenry
To: Sub-Driver
He's just sorry he got caught.
To: Sub-Driver
Not a battle of flesh and blood.
4
posted on
11/29/2005 9:33:11 AM PST
by
Pete
To: Sub-Driver
I've discovered that it irritates the heck out of liberals to call them liberal fundamentalists.
5
posted on
11/29/2005 9:33:59 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: auto power
He's just sorry he got caught. Of course he is.
6
posted on
11/29/2005 9:34:42 AM PST
by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: cripplecreek
liberal demagogues is more accurate. And it makes them very angry.
7
posted on
11/29/2005 9:34:59 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(I think so, Brain, but a #2 pencil won't write on Fruit-Roll-Ups)
To: Sub-Driver
In a written apology Monday, Paul Mirecki, chairman of the university's Religious Studies Department, said he would teach the planned class "as a serious academic subject and in an manner that respects all points of view."Sure he will.
And I have some oceanfront property in Kansas for sale.
8
posted on
11/29/2005 9:35:02 AM PST
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Sub-Driver
He needs a diversity course.
Not all conservative religious are "fundy's."
9
posted on
11/29/2005 9:35:15 AM PST
by
OpusatFR
(Yup. I'm a Rad Trad in a Novus world. And loving it!)
To: auto power
dont bite the hand that funds you.
To: Sub-Driver
"...said he would teach the planned class "as a serious academic subject and in an manner that respects all points of view."I'll just bet he will.
You suppose a Christian in his class has any chance of getting an 'A'?
11
posted on
11/29/2005 9:35:42 AM PST
by
Redbob
To: cripplecreek
That is my new phrase! LOL!
That's a keeper..
12
posted on
11/29/2005 9:35:56 AM PST
by
OpusatFR
(Yup. I'm a Rad Trad in a Novus world. And loving it!)
To: Sub-Driver
Paul Mirecki, chairman of the university's Religious Studies DepartmentI suppose I shouldn't be surprised, but I have to admit I was.
To: Sub-Driver
"Mirecki addressed the message to "my fellow damned" and signed off with: "Doing my part to (tick) off the religious right, Evil Dr. P."
A college professor hostile towards Christians? Who woulda thunk? I think its a hiring requirement now with verifiable references required on the resume.
14
posted on
11/29/2005 9:37:25 AM PST
by
GregoTX
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: Sub-Driver
===> Placemarker <===
15
posted on
11/29/2005 9:38:05 AM PST
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Sub-Driver
"... Paul Mirecki, chairman of the university's Religious Studies Department . . ."Pretty odd email statements coming from the chairman of the Religious Studies Department.
To: Sub-Driver
said he would teach the planned class "as a serious academic subject and in an manner that respects all points of view." Does anyone believe that?
There are numerous differences between Creationism and Intelligent Design. Creationism is basically a religious approach, although understandably its proponents tried to disguise it as science after the Supreme Court declared that religion would not be allowed in the public schools. It's basically a response to a distorted interpretation of the Constitution that tries to get religion in the back door. It would be better if we could appoint some decent judges and allow open and fair discussion of religion in the schools via the front door.
Intelligent Design, on the other hand, actually is a scientific approach, like it or not. It does not begin with Genesis, but begins with the nature of the universe as we find it. It does not claim to know whether the intelligence that designed the universe is the God of the Bible or something else, although people are welcome to draw their own conclusions.
The problem is, this joker will still pretend that they are the same, and that they are myths, and that the ONLY scientific theory possible is Darwinist. No other theories may be allowed to lift their heads in the public schools, now and forever more.
17
posted on
11/29/2005 9:39:45 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Coyoteman
18
posted on
11/29/2005 9:40:11 AM PST
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Sub-Driver
Christ gets no respect, but pagan elephant gods, sacred cows, and pieces of rock do.
20
posted on
11/29/2005 9:42:40 AM PST
by
Kirkwood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 721-723 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson