Recommended reading: http://www.crichton-official.com/fear/
10,000 delegates. How insane is that?
"10,000 delegates are meeting in Montreal, Canada, from November 28-December 9 to discuss new ways to fight a build-up of gases released mainly from burning fossil fuels in factories, power plants and cars.
"The United States is opposed to any such discussions," Watson told a news conference of Canadian proposals to launch talks under the U.N.'s climate convention about new actions to combat global warming beyond 2012."
F them, stupid asses! Note that China which is fast preparing to overtake us and is a HUGE polluter, is doing diddly squat. Developing country my ear, they are manufacturing everything we use. Bird brains dressed as birds.
Correction: The Kyoto Protocol was overwhelmingly rejected by the United States Senate. I can't remember the exact vote but 98-0 comes to mind.
Too bad not a one of these 10,000 delegates can actually prove the theory of "global warming."
What a bald faced lie.
The Senate during the second term of Clinton voted 97-0 against the treaty so Clinton never even formally submitted it to a vote. No treaty was established to pull out of
It's STILL Bush's fault.
CO2 is not a pollutant. It is fundamental to plant life.
"Chief U.S. climate negotiator Harlan Watson also strongly defended President George W. Bush's environmental record, saying emissions by the world's biggest polluter had fallen more in 2000-2003 than in the European Union."
A palpable lie. There is no way that Harlan Watson called the US "the world's biggest polluter".
These losers are just getting together for free meals and a hope of scamming additional grants and othe funds.
Beats working.
I have no interest in researching it, but have these morons ever been right? Even once?
Sure, I'm going to believe them this time and stay awake night chewing my nails...
Uh huh.
I watched some environmental anti-industry type on TV the other week arguing with an aviation spokeman. The aviation spokesman was being quite sensible, agreeing that it was good to reduce co2 emissions and was explaining that the aviation industry were reducing these emissions with new technology, but the environmental guy was having none of it. The aviation spokesman pointed out that the aviation industry isn't in the best financial shape and pointed out there was a limit to what could be done without bankrupting the entire industry. Still the environmental guy was having none of it and started to get irrate. When he started talking about the aviation industry causing noise "pollution" I realised he was simply anti-industry and was hoping onto any excuse to attack it. These are the kind of people who support Kyoto. They surely must realise it would have zero real effect, and yet they support it just becuase it helps their anti-industry goals.