Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/29/2005 12:24:06 PM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ZGuy

Recommended reading: http://www.crichton-official.com/fear/


2 posted on 11/29/2005 12:25:34 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

10,000 delegates. How insane is that?


3 posted on 11/29/2005 12:26:55 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Outstanding!

"10,000 delegates are meeting in Montreal, Canada, from November 28-December 9 to discuss new ways to fight a build-up of gases released mainly from burning fossil fuels in factories, power plants and cars.

"The United States is opposed to any such discussions," Watson told a news conference of Canadian proposals to launch talks under the U.N.'s climate convention about new actions to combat global warming beyond 2012."

4 posted on 11/29/2005 12:28:05 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

F them, stupid asses! Note that China which is fast preparing to overtake us and is a HUGE polluter, is doing diddly squat. Developing country my ear, they are manufacturing everything we use. Bird brains dressed as birds.


5 posted on 11/29/2005 12:28:18 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Bush pulled out in 2001 of the U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol, under which about 40 industrial nations have to cut greenhouse gas emissions by about 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 1008-12.

Correction: The Kyoto Protocol was overwhelmingly rejected by the United States Senate. I can't remember the exact vote but 98-0 comes to mind.

7 posted on 11/29/2005 12:32:44 PM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

Too bad not a one of these 10,000 delegates can actually prove the theory of "global warming."


9 posted on 11/29/2005 12:33:53 PM PST by Solson (magnae clunes mihi placent, nec possum de hac re mentiri.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
"Bush pulled out in 2001 of the U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol,"

They keep repeating this same lie over and over, but it doesn't make it any truer.

Bush didn't 'pull' out of anything.

The U.S. was NOT a signatory of the Kyoto agreement and in fact it was voted down 98-0 in the Senate.

Clinton signing it does obligate the U.S. to these panty waists.
12 posted on 11/29/2005 12:36:27 PM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
"Bush pulled out in 2001 of the U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol. . . "

What a bald faced lie.

The Senate during the second term of Clinton voted 97-0 against the treaty so Clinton never even formally submitted it to a vote. No treaty was established to pull out of

It's STILL Bush's fault.

13 posted on 11/29/2005 12:36:38 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

CO2 is not a pollutant. It is fundamental to plant life.


17 posted on 11/29/2005 12:58:18 PM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

"Chief U.S. climate negotiator Harlan Watson also strongly defended President George W. Bush's environmental record, saying emissions by the world's biggest polluter had fallen more in 2000-2003 than in the European Union."


A palpable lie. There is no way that Harlan Watson called the US "the world's biggest polluter".


18 posted on 11/29/2005 1:02:15 PM PST by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Environmentalists accused Washington of doing too little to fight a rise in temperatures from human activities that could lead to more storms, expanding deserts and worse floods, and could raise sea levels by up to three feet (one meter) by 2100.

These losers are just getting together for free meals and a hope of scamming additional grants and othe funds.

Beats working.

I have no interest in researching it, but have these morons ever been right? Even once?

Sure, I'm going to believe them this time and stay awake night chewing my nails...
Uh huh.

19 posted on 11/29/2005 1:08:48 PM PST by Publius6961 (The IQ of California voters is about 420........... .............cumulatively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Bush pulled out in 2001 of the U.N.'s Kyoto Protocol, under which about 40 industrial nations have to cut greenhouse gas emissions by about 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 1008-12.

Freudian slip there. Cutting emissions under the Kyoto Treaty would take us back to roughly 1012.
24 posted on 11/29/2005 1:48:32 PM PST by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy

I watched some environmental anti-industry type on TV the other week arguing with an aviation spokeman. The aviation spokesman was being quite sensible, agreeing that it was good to reduce co2 emissions and was explaining that the aviation industry were reducing these emissions with new technology, but the environmental guy was having none of it. The aviation spokesman pointed out that the aviation industry isn't in the best financial shape and pointed out there was a limit to what could be done without bankrupting the entire industry. Still the environmental guy was having none of it and started to get irrate. When he started talking about the aviation industry causing noise "pollution" I realised he was simply anti-industry and was hoping onto any excuse to attack it. These are the kind of people who support Kyoto. They surely must realise it would have zero real effect, and yet they support it just becuase it helps their anti-industry goals.


25 posted on 11/29/2005 1:54:24 PM PST by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ZGuy
Quit promoting a promiscuous, sin-sick immoral agenda, and a lot of climate problems will go away, because God has absolute control of the climate. Please Him, and blessings come. Rebel and disobey His commandments, and curses come. Or is that too simple for our thick headed minds to absorb.
26 posted on 11/29/2005 2:07:24 PM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (My Homeland Security: Isaiah 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson