Posted on 11/30/2005 3:00:33 AM PST by dennisw
The late Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan called it "boob bait for bubba" — tough-sounding rhetoric designed to placate conservative voters. Moynihan applied the phrase to Bill Clinton's 1992 pledge to "end welfare as we know it," which it later became clear that he had no intention of following through on when he became president (eventually, Republicans pressured him into it). President Bush is offering his own "boob bait" in the form of speechifying at the border about a crackdown on illegal immigration.
It's not that Bush doesn't intend to use better technology to police the border and end the "catch and release" policy that waves illegals into the country, as he is now saying. But these steps are primarily meant to diminish opposition to a new guest-worker program and what would effectively be an amnesty for illegal aliens. It's a crackdown as prelude to a letup; in other words, Rove bait for red-staters.
A Republican close to the White House has told Time how Bush wants to lull his conservative supporters into swallowing some sort of amnesty and a guest-worker program, i.e., a "comprehensive" approach: "Bush decided to give these guys their rhetorical pound of flesh. In return, he wants a comprehensive bill, which is what he has always wanted. He's just going to lead with a lot of noise about border security."
The idea is that the House, where conservatives have the most sway, will pass a bill with new enforcement measures, only to see the Senate pass a different bill with an amnesty and guest-worker program, which will be shoved down the throats of the House on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. Supporters of tougher enforcement will have gotten their "noise," and Bush and the business lobby will have gotten their policy. Unfortunately for this strategy, conservatives aren't nearly as stupid as the White House political shop apparently thinks they are.
If the policy debate plays out the way the White House wants, we will have another iteration of a bizarre dynamic of American politics. Every time there is agitation about out-of-control levels of immigration, Washington acts — to preserve or increase current levels of immigration. As Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies notes, this is what happened in 1986, 1990, and 1996. The White House and the Senate want 2006 to be Act IV in the farce. Senator Arlen Specter's version of "reform" doubles legal immigration.
The enforcement measures Bush is advocating are welcome and he finally seems to get the public's dismay about the lawlessness of our immigration system. But the border itself is in some ways beside the point. We can put as many agents as the Minutemen could possibly want on the border and still have an illegal-immigration problem. Forty percent of illegals overstay their visas, meaning the border isn't an issue for them. Bush and fellow supporters of a guest-worker program are right about one thing: As long as there are jobs here for illegals, they will come.
The only way to address that is through interior enforcement, which Bush made a nod toward yesterday. The natural place to start is enforcing laws already on the books. Rosemary Jenks of the group NumbersUSA has compiled a partial list of currently unenforced laws that runs to four pages. The Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service have it within their power to inform employers when they have hired illegal workers, but don't. In 2002, the Social Security Administration sent out roughly a million "no match" letters to employers telling them workers had bogus or duplicate Social Security numbers, but business groups complained and the practice stopped.
Supporters of amnesty always ask the rhetorical question: "What are you going to do with the 11 million illegal immigrants already here — deport them all?" That is obviously impractical, but requiring employers to verify that their workers are legal would prompt many illegals to leave voluntarily and staunch the flow of new arrivals. Only after our immigration system is under better control should we discuss Bush's proposed guest-worker program and any kind of amnesty for those illegals who are entrenched in our society. Until then, don't take Bush's bait.
He's a troll. He's lasted longer 'n most, though.
whispering out loud
Since Nov 22, 2005
Huh President Bush wants to cut taxes for the middle class(actually everybody).
It is the democrats who wish to stick it to the middle class taxpayer.
It's all a globalist conspiracy.
There will be no middle class in the globalist future. Just those of us outside the walls waiting for Dane to deliver the soilent green.
President Bush has busted the budget, and left a huge mess for my children to repair. It will get very ugly.
Huh the deficit is less than per % GDP than Reagan's time and you are right your children are going to have a huge mess to repair with social security, that ponzi scheme is going broke, and it is the democrats who are blocking any reform.
Yup. But it's of no consequence to the Bushbots.
Actually wasn't the movie Soylent Green set in the year 2005. Huh, there aren't food riots, actaully obesity is now the problem.
His "proposal" is Bush-it.
It's the same pig with a different shade of the same color lipstick.
drink much kool-aid?
Nope and not drinking yours either.
So now your accusing us American Citizens of making the poor Mexican illegals fat! Does your disdain for American's ever end. You sir are a patriot of the highest degree, you are always right on every issue. I am amazed at the huge number of people you have managed to influence over the past few years. You always win everyone over to your side twenty seconds after an immigration thread starts. When it comes to expressing conservative ideals you are truly unmatched in the universe. We humbly bow down to your brilliance each and every day. Actually we should just rename the sight Dane's free Republic.
What the hell are you talking about. You mentioned the movie Soylent Green, a movie I believe set in the year 2005 and how shows a world of hunger and poverty, all I noted is that in the year 2005, hunger isn't a problem in America, obeseity is.
Sheesh get a grip.
Do that and the vast majority of illegal will stop coming and then controlling the border will become easy.
THANKS! And that folks comes straight from the horse's mouth. Marine Inspector works in either ICE or our Customs Service. He knows what the deal is
Sure why not, although you will conviently forget that he has cut taxes, signed a partial birth abortion bill, signed an education bill the NEA hates and IMO will lead to more school choice, signed a bill protecting gun manufactuerers from frivolus law suits, is in support of private medical accounts, has proposed real social security reform etc.etc.
So MI, is saying the way to stop illegal immigration is to contract the economy(i.e put it into recession), isn't that throwing the baby out with the bath water.
What the hell am I talking about. Are you saying that you have difficulty understanding English? Let me go very slow so even tools like yourself can understand. You are alone, you are a joke. For years you have been here fighting for your pro illegal position and you have never convinced a single person to see it your way. If you were anything other than an absolute hack you would have noticed that you could have been sneaking in hundreds of illegals during the time you have waisted on this sight. Whatever the reason is that you repeatedly come here day in and day out you are failing miserably.
Huh Ms. Miers isn't on SCOTUS, ted kennedy hates his own education bill, thank God, Bush doesn't listen to armchair generals, and he actually put tariffs on steel, which did abosolutely no good(economically or politically).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.