Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Next for Conservatives (Creationism and spending are destroying the Republican Party)
townhall.com ^ | 11/17/2005 | George Will

Posted on 12/01/2005 10:55:04 AM PST by curiosity

Edited on 12/01/2005 11:11:54 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-340 next last
To: scory

"So I don't see this as much of a problem. But the spending is a different matter altogether. Republicans have gone nuts on this in recent years. But democrats would do as much or more. So - - - term limits, anyone?"

Agree with you! Well said.

Term limits are still a great option. In the absence of those, we'd have to take away the rule that if a Congressperson gets elected to a minimum of 2 consecutive terms, they automatically qualify for a juicy retirement (what? around $200,000 per year, isn't it?)

How about limited taxation, in the form of a flat tax, and some form of "torture"- ahhh, excuse me, I mean, personal penalty for the Congressional jamokes who vote for projects that bust the budget and don't benefit at least 51% of the population? That would be entertaining, at the least.

Let them begin the queue behind Sheets Byrd.


61 posted on 12/01/2005 11:44:19 AM PST by Anselma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
As a teenager in High School, I volunteered for Barry Goldwater's Presidential campaign. (1964) I was a conservative young atheist, much to the chagrin of my religious mother. I don't remember any fundamentalist, or even devout Christians in the campaign then. Most of the young volunteers were would-be, and future policy wonks and political junkies.
62 posted on 12/01/2005 11:44:26 AM PST by rootkidslim (... got the Sony rootkit on your Wintel box? You can thank Orrin Hatch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
No need to do that - just offer an alternative science class with alternative textbooks.

I have no problem with this, as soon as a scientific alternative is proposed.

63 posted on 12/01/2005 11:44:45 AM PST by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

equivalent of a knuckledragging tobacco chewing cousin marrying 8th grade graduate.

Shhhhhh. I don't want people to know what I look like:).


64 posted on 12/01/2005 11:44:59 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I'm sick and tired of the Republicans spending like drunken sailors...

Here we go again. I used to be a drunken sailor, and I always take offense at this remark. Even in my most drunken state, I never spent with the lack of responsibility that is shown by the Republicans in Congress and our Republican President. I wish people would stop comparing the fiscal responsibility of drunken sailors with the total lack of control shown by our Republican politicians. ;-)

65 posted on 12/01/2005 11:46:21 AM PST by wyattearp (The best weapon to have in a gunfight is a shotgun - preferably from ambush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Sidereal astrology has more scientific merit than the theory of evolution.

Then you'll have no problem showing us the evidence for sidereal astrology, right? The physical evidence? The scientific journals, the scientific peer review, the articles and publications?

If not, then kindly stop making silly claims.

66 posted on 12/01/2005 11:47:27 AM PST by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
If creationism results in electoral losses in a place like Dover, a country that went for Bush by a huge margin in both 2000 and 2005, it's going to kill us everything.

If creationism becomes the biggest issue, then it is unfortunate. There are far more bigger and more important issues out there to act upon.

67 posted on 12/01/2005 11:47:30 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

This debate should be kept out of Republican politics. There is no upside to making this a political issue.


68 posted on 12/01/2005 11:47:54 AM PST by colorado tanker (I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Poland, for example, is a far more socially conservative country than the US. Far more religious, I'd venture to say. And yet, no one there has any problem with evolution.

The sad thing about those theological conservatives, who feel that their Faith requires them to deny Evolution, as testament to their belief in Creation, is that they have completely ignored the most powerful scientific argument for a deliberate, well planned (designed) and ongoing Creational dynamic. About 30 years ago, the Naturalists in the Kruger National Park in South Africa, reported a finding that suggested a predetermined pattern to the development of mutations in some species. I wish I could offer a specific reference, but that was a report which the religious community should have embraced.

In denying Evolution, on the other hand, people deny what has been carefully recorded even in the last few Centuries, with respect to Domesticated animals. That denial is foolish, and simply turns off other people.

69 posted on 12/01/2005 11:48:07 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Bush's statement that George Will reported... If Bush really believes that "both sides should be taught" then he is likely ignorant of science. If he was insincere, it was "boob bait for the bubbas."
70 posted on 12/01/2005 11:48:13 AM PST by rootkidslim (... got the Sony rootkit on your Wintel box? You can thank Orrin Hatch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rootkidslim

That doesn't have anything to do with my post.


71 posted on 12/01/2005 11:49:07 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp
Here we go again. I used to be a drunken sailor, and I always take offense at this remark.

Never knew Wyatt had a second career:).

72 posted on 12/01/2005 11:49:30 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
They may be in some cases. But most people are not really ideological. Most people have a collection of not very well sorted out beliefs--some driven by thought, some emotion. The point where one--if such a point ever comes--actually sorts out the inherent conflicts in personal beliefs is a very important one. But that point never comes for most people.

True - but then what do we call them? We could just keep saying Republicans, and work to make it clear that not all Republicans are Conservative, but that could lead to many Conservatives leaving the party, and I worry that it would lead to the GOP becoming very religious-oriented. I've been to countries where the people/parties in power were focused completly on religion, and to say it was disturbing is an understatement.
73 posted on 12/01/2005 11:49:39 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

to the GOP becoming very religious-oriented

It is already.


74 posted on 12/01/2005 11:50:39 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: rootkidslim

"boob bait for the bubbas."

Monica Lewinsky on a stick???


75 posted on 12/01/2005 11:51:42 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: wyattearp

LOL!


76 posted on 12/01/2005 11:52:01 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Sorry if I misconstrued the meaning of your post, as I am for my double post.
77 posted on 12/01/2005 11:52:35 AM PST by rootkidslim (... got the Sony rootkit on your Wintel box? You can thank Orrin Hatch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: rootkidslim

I was responding to a post that said George Will knew more about baseball than science. I said that didn't imply that George Will was ignorant of science.


78 posted on 12/01/2005 11:54:58 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: moog
If creationism becomes the biggest issue, then it is unfortunate.

IMO people don't really care that much about evolution/creationism in schools -- it's more of a flashpoint, a reaction against the atheist liberal indoctrination that is rampant in many public school systems, from sex ed classes to no prayer in school to no Christmas celebration to skewed teaching of history and polisci.

The sad state of public school education is indeed an important issue; this is just a convenient though perhaps ill-chosen vehicle for objection.

79 posted on 12/01/2005 11:55:15 AM PST by JohnnyZ (Veterans' Day. Enough said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: js1138

George Will knew more about baseball than science

I could have used his help on how to hit curveballs.


80 posted on 12/01/2005 11:55:45 AM PST by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson