Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel readies forces for strike on nuclear Iran
The Sunday Times ^ | December 11, 2005 | Uzi Mahnaimi, Tel Aviv, and Sarah Baxter, Washington

Posted on 12/10/2005 6:48:44 PM PST by rhainw

ISRAEL’S armed forces have been ordered by Ariel Sharon, the prime minister, to be ready by the end of March for possible strikes on secret uranium enrichment sites in Iran, military sources have revealed. The order came after Israeli intelligence warned the government that Iran was operating enrichment facilities, believed to be small and concealed in civilian locations.

Iran’s stand-off with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) over nuclear inspections and aggressive rhetoric from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, who said last week that Israel should be moved to Europe, are causing mounting concern.

The crisis is set to come to a head in early March, when Mohamed El-Baradei, the head of the IAEA, will present his next report on Iran. El-Baradei, who received the Nobel peace prize yesterday, warned that the world was “losing patience” with Iran.

A senior White House source said the threat of a nuclear Iran was moving to the top of the international agenda and the issue now was: “What next?” That question would have to be answered in the next few months, he said.

Defence sources in Israel believe the end of March to be the “point of no return” after which Iran will have the technical expertise to enrich uranium in sufficient quantities to build a nuclear warhead in two to four years.

“Israel — and not only Israel — cannot accept a nuclear Iran,” Sharon warned recently. “We have the ability to deal with this and we’re making all the necessary preparations to be ready for such a situation.”

The order to prepare for a possible attack went through the Israeli defence ministry to the chief of staff. Sources inside special forces command confirmed that “G” readiness — the highest stage — for an operation was announced last week.

Gholamreza Aghazadeah, head of the Atomic Organisation of Iran, warned yesterday that his country would produce nuclear fuel. “There is no doubt that we have to carry out uranium enrichment,” he said.

He promised it would not be done during forthcoming talks with European negotiators. But although Iran insists it wants only nuclear energy, Israeli intelligence has concluded it is deceiving the world and has no intention of giving up what it believes is its right to develop nuclear weapons.

A “massive” Israeli intelligence operation has been underway since Iran was designated the “top priority for 2005”, according to security sources.

Cross-border operations and signal intelligence from a base established by the Israelis in northern Iraq are said to have identified a number of Iranian uranium enrichment sites unknown to the the IAEA.

Since Israel destroyed the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981, “it has been understood that the lesson is, don’t have one site, have 50 sites”, a White House source said.

If a military operation is approved, Israel will use air and ground forces against several nuclear targets in the hope of stalling Tehran’s nuclear programme for years, according to Israeli military sources.

It is believed Israel would call on its top special forces brigade, Unit 262 — the equivalent of the SAS — and the F-15I strategic 69 Squadron, which can strike Iran and return to Israel without refuelling.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: attack; forces; iran; irannukes; israel; nuclear; strike; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-315 next last
To: rhainw

Considering that Iran is the world's main sponsor of Islamic terrorism including support for violence against our troops in Iraq, it's time for the U.S. to step up support for any and all resistance groups in Iran. This should include money, arms and technical assistance. We should also employ regional mercenaries to aid in the struggle against this totalitarian theocracy. It's time to bring the war and terror to the puppet masters of the terrorists.


101 posted on 12/10/2005 8:09:39 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Babsig

This is probably just to gauge what the Iranian reaction will be. Their new President has show that he is flippant of tonge. Feed the media some info knowing it will get to the enemy and watch and listen. Note all the un-named sources in the story. Sharon simply stated the obvious...We're getting ready. You knew that. Israel does not play (except with their enemies minds)...they can't afford to.


102 posted on 12/10/2005 8:11:59 PM PST by gooleyman ( What about the baby's "RIGHT TO CHOOSE"?????? I bet the baby would chose LIFE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
it's time for the U.S. to step up support for any and all resistance groups in Iran. This should include money, arms and technical assistance. We should also employ regional mercenaries to aid in the struggle against this totalitarian theocracy. It's time to bring the war and terror to the puppet masters of the terrorists.

Agreed.

103 posted on 12/10/2005 8:13:12 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

..........................................

104 posted on 12/10/2005 8:13:46 PM PST by SJackson (There's no such thing as too late, that's why they invented death. Walter Matthau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Babsig

Agreed. Our advance notice to Iraq did so much to enable us to find the materiel that was convoyed out to Syria and buried in the desert.


105 posted on 12/10/2005 8:14:18 PM PST by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

F-15I

Conformal tanks


106 posted on 12/10/2005 8:16:30 PM PST by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

LOL

Was that the guy that does "Family Guy?"


107 posted on 12/10/2005 8:16:30 PM PST by freedumb2003 (American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: rhainw

1] Any "strike" that is not a tactical nuclear strike would yield little. No conventional strike can do much good.

2] Any article that does not mention the role Russia plays in aiding Israel is void of worthiness as a serious commentary or factual report. You can not take Russia out of the equation when it comes to discussing options on what to do. This article never mentioned Russia, and thus is a worthless article.


108 posted on 12/10/2005 8:16:34 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeffersonRepublic.com
Unless of course Israel has other ideas and timing...
109 posted on 12/10/2005 8:16:36 PM PST by AZRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: JeffersonRepublic.com

Unless Iran is going to call Mayflower and move, the plan has problems.
As good as the Israelis might be, airplanes still need gas and, unless they can go to the UNCLE SAM`s all service gas station, this whole thing is not going to happen. But, if we do it, and we would do a better job then the Israelis, got to be all for it.
Half the problems in Iraq are coming from Iran (the other half is from the DNC)and, don`t we still owe the mullahs a little payback?


111 posted on 12/10/2005 8:17:55 PM PST by bybybill (GOD help us if the Rats win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

yep, scene from family guy...don't know which episode.


112 posted on 12/10/2005 8:18:02 PM PST by benjibrowder (Join the dark side. We have cookies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

Comment #113 Removed by Moderator

To: He Rides A White Horse; Brad from Tennessee



"Agreed."

Second the motion.


114 posted on 12/10/2005 8:21:22 PM PST by strategofr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

Have but one word reguarding your post about Russia and Israel.....HUH?
What on earth are you talking about?


115 posted on 12/10/2005 8:22:25 PM PST by bybybill (GOD help us if the Rats win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

"the role Russia plays in aiding Israel "

huh?


116 posted on 12/10/2005 8:22:34 PM PST by strategofr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: rhainw

Why should Israel who is treated as a pariah among nations have to take action which is in the best interest of the entire world?


117 posted on 12/10/2005 8:23:49 PM PST by Radix (Wishful Thinking: A Tag Line Field which actually contains enough places to complete a serious thou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Yes. Major typo.

I am going to redo post.

Thx


118 posted on 12/10/2005 8:24:07 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

Correction to post #108: (Iran, not Israel re Russian aid)

1] Any "strike" that is not a tactical nuclear strike would yield little. No conventional strike can do much good.

2] Any article that does not mention the role Russia plays in aiding Iran is void of worthiness as a serious commentary or factual report. You can not take Russia out of the equation when it comes to discussing options on what to do. This article never mentioned Russia, and thus is a worthless article.


119 posted on 12/10/2005 8:25:58 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: strategofr; bybybill

Correction on typo--see post #119

Thx


120 posted on 12/10/2005 8:27:16 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 301-315 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson