Skip to comments.
Woman died on cannabis drug trial
BBC ^
| 12/12/05
| bbc
Posted on 12/12/2005 11:26:03 AM PST by minus_273
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 201-216 next last
To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
Anyone who aids and abets the use of illegal drugs is a druggie.
So I am aiding and abetting illegal drug use by pointing out that people also dies from the use of approved pharmaceuticals and incompetent doctors? I am aiding and abetting illegal drug use by not believing everything disseminated by government bureaucrats who depend on the War on drugs for employment?
141
posted on
12/13/2005 3:12:04 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: FormerACLUmember
No, you WOSD'ers are the biggest bunch of losers I've ever seen.
Nobody claims it's harmless.
What we say is "It's none of your business what I do inside my own home"!!
Is THAT so hard for you to digest.
Do ANY ONE of you WOSD'ers think that there is something YOU do that I might object to...maybe smoking, drinking, eating fatty food, not exercising, engaging in unprotected sex with multiple partners, eating fast-food, using chemical fertilizers, engaging in high-risk sports.
See ALL of these things have consequences. And, as ADULTS, we make choices. However, you folks seem to think your better and smarter than everybody else (typical for fascist liberals - which you are - cause there is no such thing as a "conservative drug-warrior". That is impossible. You merely come off - rightfully so - as "conservative hypocrites").
In addition, all WOSD'er are too stupid to realize that the difference between "high risk activities that are legal" and "high risk activities that are illegal" is an arbitrary distinction, made up by your government based upon who has bribed them with the most money. And, you guys, follow lockstep behind the fascists, spewing out lies, inaccuracies, fallacies and ignorance.
I, personally, think one of the most disgusting traits humans have is hypocrisy. And every WOSD'er I have ever know was and are the BIGGEST hypocrites out there.
You guys make Hillary look principled.
142
posted on
12/13/2005 3:16:45 AM PST
by
KeepUSfree
(WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
To: -YYZ-
Bravo!!! - and 2112 right back at ya'
143
posted on
12/13/2005 3:18:53 AM PST
by
KeepUSfree
(WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
To: R. Scott; JTN; headsonpikes; gdani
Some of our "esteemd and trusted" gov't bureaucrats, like ex-Deputy Drug Czar Andrea Barthwell, have done a complete turnaround on medical marijuana. Of course, she had to be placed on the
payroll first.
144
posted on
12/13/2005 3:23:03 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: R. Scott
145
posted on
12/13/2005 3:31:41 AM PST
by
PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
(How long do we have to pretend that the vast majority of Democrats are patriots?)
To: KeepUSfree; MadManDan
"Nobody claims it's harmless."Really? Usually there's one like these on every marijuana thread:
"Smoking anything is bad for your lungs, but other than that, pot is freaking harmless."
-- MadManDan, post #43
Maye the two of you pot lovers ought to get together to get your stories straight.
"What we say is "It's none of your business what I do inside my own home"!! Is THAT so hard for you to digest."
Well, yeah, it is. Because you're NOT "doing it in your home". Certainly the 800,000 pot smokers arrested last year weren't "doing it in their own home".
Oh, by the way. We are under no obligation to protect your right to do dope.
To: robertpaulsen
First of all - it's just like a fascist to take someone else's words and put them in my mouth. I am not responsible for anyone else's view. Therefore - here it goes: "Pot is bad for you". Big friggin' deal.
Next lie - ask the 800,000 not arrested in their homes. OK, how do you know "how many were arrested in their homes"... you don't you just throw out this figure as if it MEANS something. It doesn't The truth is, you think the Drug-nazis should be able to kick in my door and arrest me in my house for smoking pot - c'mon at least be honest about it - you HATE druggies ... damn the facts, damn the truth, damn the constitution - YOU hate them - they must be destroyed. In fact, you probably get so upset thinking about the druggies that you have to go have a beer and a cigarette to calm yourself down!!!!. Also, how many of those "800000" were USING the pot. Just like someone going to the liquor store, many of those folks were just taking it from one place to another.
Come up with something that isn't based upon pure ignorance and hatred, and I'll be glad to listen. Meanwhile, folks like yourself give the rest of the liberals all the ammunition they need to show what a bunch of Hypocrites the right-wingers are. Drug warriors are nothing but a zit on the face of the constitution.
147
posted on
12/13/2005 5:09:48 AM PST
by
KeepUSfree
(WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
To: Wolfie
Follow the money. If a person is earning a living from the War on drugs either as a dealer or enforcer of the law they will generally want marijuana kept illegal with stiff penalties. If they are paid by the pharmaceutical companies they will want marijuana based drugs legalized.
148
posted on
12/13/2005 5:10:02 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: R. Scott; JTN; libertyman
The reason Sativex is such a problem for the Prohibitionists is because its not a marijuana based drug. It is marijuana in oral spray form - strictly speaking, its liquid weed. And if liquid weed is medicine, so is the plant. Which only leaves the smoked aspect as being a concern, easily circumvented by a vaporizer.
149
posted on
12/13/2005 5:19:05 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: KeepUSfree
OK. Subtract the two dopers who were toking up in their living room when the DEA Nazi thugs broke down their door for kicks.
That still leaves 799,998 potheads on the street with marijuana -- smoking, dealing, and transporting. Those that were caught, that is.
And we're arresting, what, 10% max? That means 8 million potheads walking and driving around in public. So much for your "It's none of your business what I do inside my own home".
To: MadManDan
LOL.. You zeee ve have vays of knowing zese things.
Merry Christmas
151
posted on
12/13/2005 5:41:51 AM PST
by
SunnySide
(Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
To: KeepUSfree
Mellow out, dude. Take another hit of that kilo stash you are working on this week.
Either that or stay off the crack.
To: Wolfie
WHAT!!! Have those people never watched the true documentary Reefer Madness! Its a killer weed! It will turn innocent citizens into murdering rapists! < /sarcasm>
153
posted on
12/13/2005 6:31:45 AM PST
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: minus_273
how hard is it to check for DUI? how hard is it to check for some guy who is drving high? at that point it is no longer a harmless drug. Marijuana does not impair the ability to drive.
154
posted on
12/13/2005 6:43:11 AM PST
by
JTN
("We must win the War on Drugs by 2003." - Dennis Hastert, Feb. 25 1999)
To: FormerACLUmember
Sorry, not this time! Just defending truth, justice, freedom, and the American Way. We all have our hot-button issues....death penalty, abortion, whatever. Mine is hypocrisy. My goal is to stamp it out - ESPECIALLY on the right. If you believe in Freedom - then let men be free. Don't just allow them the freedoms that some group deems acceptable. And, since there are many, many things that are allowed in society that are used for adult pleasure and are more dangerous than drugs - alchohol and nicotine being 2 easy examples - motorcycles and swimming pools are others - you can't logically legalize one and imprison someone for the other.
So, to me, it is simple. Be consistent, Defend Freedom - no matter the form.
155
posted on
12/13/2005 6:45:15 AM PST
by
KeepUSfree
(WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
To: minus_273
taking potI think she's on the pot. She's taking the pot, and now she's on the pot. She's the pot-on head, because she took the pot and now she's on the pot, and pot-on heads are often on the pot.
156
posted on
12/13/2005 6:47:30 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Liberals screwed again: HOLIDAY derives from the words Holy Day. NOW what will they do?)
To: Lazamataz
Oh God, it's that crazy... Hi Laz!!
157
posted on
12/13/2005 6:58:45 AM PST
by
exodus
To: driftless
Paul McCartney's sappy post-Beatles career. Hey! No dissin' on Band on the Run!
158
posted on
12/13/2005 6:59:26 AM PST
by
JTN
("We must win the War on Drugs by 2003." - Dennis Hastert, Feb. 25 1999)
To: exodus
Hi. You're not on the pot, are you? I hate people on the pot, taking the pot and being on the pot like that.
Besides, we're big pants people.
159
posted on
12/13/2005 7:00:09 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Liberals screwed again: HOLIDAY derives from the words Holy Day. NOW what will they do?)
To: Lazamataz
Nope, not me!
I got off the pot as soon as I realised that I couldn't not make sense when I got high.
160
posted on
12/13/2005 7:05:07 AM PST
by
exodus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 201-216 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson