Skip to comments.Creation evangelist derides evolution as ‘dumbest’ theory [Kent Hovind Alert!]
Posted on 12/17/2005 3:58:48 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
You'll have to pardon me; all the atheistic websites come up when I start with Mao; they seem to think he's a beautiful, wise man. Positive atheism and Mao. Too funny.
There's something a bit disturbing about his ranting paranoia. I certainly don't remember killing any Jews.
But none of that has anything to do with what belongs in biology class.
I'm trying to quit. When I get down to one a month, I'm going cold turkey.
I'm beginning to find it disturbing that I'm wasting my time arguing with The Three Stooges wearing monkey suits congratulating themselves on their evolutionary superiority.
VadeRetro: Your argument is based on paranoia.
Stultis: (Shows a flashcard)
VadeRetro: Yeah, he's right. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.
Stultis: (another flashcard)
Dimensio: You're a genius and they're stupid VadeRetro.
VadeRetro: That because they're Luddites.
Stultis: (yet another flashcard)
Dimensio: They're just paranoid.
VadeRetro: Libertarians are the best. Your hit, Dimensio.
Dimensio: 'ere dude, your hit. We won this one (exhales).
VadeRetro: Atheism, free dope, Darwin and Margaret Sanger. All that makes America great. Gimme that.
Stultis: (flashcard-My hit)
Bush only gets compared to Hitler. I get Hitler and Caligula! Woo-hoo!
Now go find your medication and take it. Seriously.
All the above I listed were atheists. You've heard the all quotes before; banning of religion is the common theme. Religion is the mortal enemy of atheists, dictators, totalitarians. They are all in the same camp.
Now go find your medication and take it. Seriously.
When you atheists make your move, I'll have your medicine. A steel jacketed round right through your open mouth.
The worst thing for you is that I'm not afraid of you would be dictators....keep shoving your agenda down our throats and see what happens.
You've been wasting all our time for days. Glad you finally have a clue. Your time would be best spent talking to a mental health professional. At least talk to a family member or an old friend.
I'm putting putting you on virtual ignore. You'll get no more replies from me. Be well. Try to understand that, while as a citizen you can influence the world, you can't control it. You live in a free society and people will disagree with you about many things. Not all of these people are evil. Not all of these people want to destroy you. Most just want to live their own lives and will readily tolerate your doing likewise.
Again, you live in a free society. People in this society associate many different ways, in many different kinds of coalitions and other cooperate arrangements, even when they don't agree on everything. Their are many cleavages in this society, but there are also many strands running in many directions that hold it together.
Your notion that there is only one cleavage overriding all, that everyone falls definitively to one side or ther other, and that universal and violent social conflict will result, IS DELUSIONAL. Even if you see the world this way, there are not enough other people who do: even among the most conservative of the conservative. You may have some freinds that feel this way (or pretend to rather than argue with you) but there are deviant. There are not enough such people to initiate the violence you anticipate. That's simply a fact. IT ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN.
Whatever flaws you percieve, you live in a society that provides you more freedom and potential to realize your own values in your life than any in all of human history. Please try to find a way to live in this society and have some optimism.
And finally, just a recommendation: Stop posting awhile. I assure you that with your present approach and outlook you are NOT helping any cause that you believe in, but only discrediting it.
Just one more thing... Although I won't be replying further, I will be reading your messages. After a day to two (as I think it would be better if you take some time off voluntarily) I start flagging extremist threats like this to the moderators.
*runs into the night*
Flag away. It's a warning, a warning that if you continue in your present way, there will be conflict. This is not Nazi Germany, and you and your friends will not inflict such a state of affairs on this country.
Read my posts, open my mail while you're at it, Herr Stultis. But whatever you do, just remember we'll be there to protect ourselves when the time comes.
I doubt that very much.
I'm not talking murder here, as any discerning person would see.
I'm warning you that if you attempt to impose any type of totalitarian society upon us, you'll pay the consequences.
If you attempt to exploit the weak, you'll pay the consequences.
If you attempt to practice the genocidal policies of Eugenics, you'll pay the consequences.
American soldiers overthrowing Saddam, American soldiers opposing atheistic communism, American soldiers fighting the Nazis, none were crazed, paranoid, or whatever such label you would attach to them.
You see Stultis, I'm a vet also.....and I swore an oath to defend this country against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The difference between you and I is that I meant it when I said it.
Being a soldier in any war such as I have described above does not make me a murderer if it comes down to it. Especially when you are the obvious aggressor. As a Christian, I don't fear death. Do you?
lol ok very funny. You did well to play this joke on a few people for so long but im calling it now. Im afraid the "As a Christian, I don't fear death. Do you?" gave it away - Islamist parody.
If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.
-C. S. Lewis
Education without values, as useful as it is, seems rather to make man a more clever devil.
-C. S. Lewis
A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading.
-C. S. Lewis
A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell.
-C. S. Lewis
Evidently, they've been rather quiet since that last one.
They accuse me of wanting to gun down people, etc. Far be it from the truth. I'm warning them they are headed down the wrong road, one which will inevitably lead to conflict. The current state of affairs is such that they are becoming the dictators they claim to despise so much. Their talking points are ripped right from the pages of the left wing media establishment, yet they claim to be vanguards of conservatism.
They have what one might call a narrow intelligence, they can only see what is in front of them, yet they lack an important ingredient-vision.
It is pointless to debate with such dishonest people. They pretend that people such as myself are in the minority of thinkers, when my local YMCA has more members than their Libertarian Party.
Let them continue in their way. In the end they be sitting there saying, "What just happened?"
Similarities have zero to do with it. When you don't know, you can't rule out what you don't know. Yet you want to rule out anything you don't know that doesn't support your theory. That isn't science. And that is the core point. You aren't dealing with evidences, you're dealing with assumptions in place of evidence and modelling based on assumptions. That is the base point of your position - the weakest link. And at that level, your construct is only as good as your assumptions and then only one possible option in a pool of infinite possibility. You chose a fiction you liked and adopted it. Bully for you. But that isn't science.
Inference or assumption is all the same thing. What you observe is one thing. Assuming what you observe has always been that way is as valid as looking at Mt St. Helens and assuming it's always looked the way it looks now. I use that as an obvious example because we know it has not. On the other hand, there are countless regions we could look at and make any number of assumptions about - any of them could be valid or non of them. Picking one and pontificating on it doesn't make it valid - it just makes that assumption the one you like.
Biblical literalism has zero to do with it. Taking the Bible seriously is rather the issue. And it isn't "Biblical" literalism many of you have a problem with.. it's language literalism you eschew - wanting to change the meaning of language to allow you to say something the language doesn't contextually support.
As for the "serious consequences" you speak of for variable rates, you assume you know what you're talking about. If you don't know the environ and how it all happened, you can't possibly speak to the impact of a variable rate. Ie, pull the other one. You're trying to tell us that wind speed is a factor in bullet travel even when the bullet travels through a vacuum as it were. Wind doesn't exist in a vacuum, therefore, it would not affect the travel of the bullet. You also don't know the rate of change if it did happen. Without knowing rate of change or environment, you sit there and say it's impossible. How big a moron do you take the planet for?! This is part of what we speak about consistently. You don't know, therefore you pontificate what you'd like to be the case in ignorance hoping everyone lets you get by with it. We're not ignoring reality, we're just ignoring your spin.