Skip to comments.Traitors of Record: The Record of the New York Times
Posted on 12/19/2005 8:51:45 AM PST by Fedora
Traitors of Record: The Record of the New York Times
. . .the most untrustworthy paper in the United States. . .
--President Dwight Eisenhower, referring to the New York Times
Last week Senator John Cornyn criticized the New York Times for endangering national security with a James Risen story on NSA surveillance timed to coincide with a vote on the Patriot Act and, incidentally, with the release of a book by Risen. A review of the record illustrates that endangering national security through irresponsible leaks is nothing new for the New York Times. Some particularly outrageous examples are worth recalling here to underscore why action against the New York Times is long overdue.
Background: A Failed Housecleaning
It is well known that the Times has been criticized for failing to whole-heartedly repudiate the reporting of Walter Duranty, who has been dubbed Stalins Apologist for echoing Soviet propaganda throughout the 1920s and 1930s. Less often discussed is the fact that Durantys reporting was not an isolated case at the Times.
At the turn of the 20th century publisher Adolph Ochs had gained his controlling interest in the Times with financial assistance from Jacob Schiff of the banking firm Kuhn Loeb. Schiff was a key financier of pre-Soviet Marxism in the US as well as the Bolshevik revolutionaries in Russia. Schiff and Ochs cofounded the Henry Street Settlement, which became an early center of Marxist and Soviet activity in the US.
Ochs was succeeded as Times publisher in 1935 by Arthur Hays Sulzberger. Sulzberger had sympathized with the Communist cause as a youth, but gradually drifted towards anti-Communism as the Cold War approached. In the process he became concerned about the Communist Partys efforts to infiltrate the Times through the American Newspaper Guild, whose New York local was dominated by Communists.
The American Newspaper Guild attempted to purge Communist elements in 1948, but this effort was only partially successful. After the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee (SISS) began an investigation of Communist infiltration of the newspaper industry, the exposure of a cell that included Times reporter Clayton Knowles prompted the Times to begin conducting an internal probe in 1954. The probe and SISS investigation resulted in the firing of Times copyeditor Melvin Barnet. SISS ended up calling 30 witnesses from the Times to testify in December 1955 hearings.
To what extent these attempts to purge Communist elements from the Times were successful is unknown. But what may be documented is that the Times has had a continuous record of compromising national security by leaking classified information from the late 1950s on.
Exhibit A: Compromising the U-2
Reporter Joseph Alsop started out the Cold War anti-Soviet. But he was careless with his sex life--to put it delicately--and while he was travelling to Moscow to cover a story, the KGB photographed him in a compromising position to try to blackmail him into working as a spy. Seeking a way out of the trap he had been lured into, Alsop went for help to his State Department friend Charles Bohlen, who was suspected by the FBI and Senate investigators of being similarly compromised. Some researchers have reported sources claiming that Bohlen was able to get friends in the CIA to help Alsop out of the situation. But other information suggests there was more to the story.
In early 1960 Alsop wrote a story for the New York Times hinting at US knowledge of secret Soviet missile developments. This story came in the midst of an election-year debate over whether the Eisenhower administrations fiscally-conservative defense policies had allowed a missile gap to open by letting Soviet technology outpace US progress. President Eisenhower knew from U-2 surveillance that in fact the US remained well ahead of the Soviets and there was no missile gap, but he could not publicly reveal this without compromising the top-secret U-2 program. Alsop was friends with the CIA agent in charge of the U-2 program, Richard Bissell, and the information in Alsops story on Soviet missile developments was based on information generated by U-2 surveillance. Eisenhower could not refute Alsops intimation of a missile gap without exposing the U-2 program in the process. The resulting missile gap stigma played a significant role in swinging the 1960 election to John Kennedy.
Eisenhower was normally noted for his calm temperament and slowness to anger, and it took a great deal to make him lose his temper. But when he saw Alsops article, he reportedly exploded. As Eisenhower biographer Stephen Ambrose records, one of Eisenhowers associates noted that the President is extremely angry and has talked at length about the lack of loyalty to the U.S. of these people. In his estimation Joseph Alsop is about the lowest form of animal life on earth. . . On another occasion Eisenhower called the Times the most untrustworthy paper in the United States.
Exhibit B: Sabotaging the Bay of Pigs
A year after Alsops article, the Times published an article by Tad Szulc exposing the CIAs plan for an upcoming attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro by inserting an invasion force into Cuba at the Bay of Pigs.
During Castros rise to power in the 1950s he had been supported by Times reporter Herbert Matthews, who had previously given sympathetic coverage to the Communist side during the Spanish Civil War. Castros ascent was also supported by a left-wing faction in the State Department, which continually interfered with the CIAs planning for the Bay of Pigs operation, advising Kennedy to make various tactically-stupid changes including calling off air strikes that were crucial to the success of the operation. One of Castros State Department sympathizers, Chester Bowles, decided to sabotage the Bay of Pigs operation by leaking the invasion plan to the press.
Through contacts in the Cuban exile community, the invasion plan came to the attention of Szulc. Szulc had been suspected by US intelligence of being a foreign agent since 1948, when an FBI file identified him as a Communist. In 1959 the CIA also became suspicious of him when he falsely claimed clearance in an attempt to obtain classified information. Later in the 1970s the FBI would observe him in contact with a KGB agent, and the CIA would link his daughter to Cuban spy Philip Agee.
Szulcs article on the Bay of Pigs operation was published in the New York Times on April 7, 1961, less than two weeks before the planned invasion. Although Szulcs supervisors forced him to delete some information on national security grounds at the request of CIA Director Allen Dulles, they allowed him to publish the story over the objections of both Dulles and the Times own Washington bureau chief James Reston, and they allowed the final draft of the article to include a reference to a CBS News report which mentioned the deleted information.
To keep things in perspective, it should be noted that the failure of the Bay of Pigs was ultimately more due to the State Departments interference with the air strikes than to Szulcs article. But Szulc and the Times certainly did their share to help keep Castro in power.
Exhibit C: Helping the Vietcong
In December 1966 Times reporter Harrison Salisbury became the first American journalist allowed in North Vietnam. Salisbury has previously been the Times Soviet correspondent. His entry to North Vietnam was arranged by Wilfred Burchett, an Australian journalist who worked for the KGB and for the pro-Vietcong news outlet Dispatch News Service.
Dispatch News Service had been founded by the Marxist think tank the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), linked to Soviet and Cuban intelligence. IPS financier Philip Stern also funded the Fund for Investigative Journalism, which paid for upcoming reporter Seymour Hersh to research allegations of atrocities committed by US soldiers at My Lai. Hershs My Lai story was provided by Dispatch News to the New York Times.
The Times coverage of My Lai inspired the European-based Soviet front group the International War Crimes Tribunal, whose conferences Burchett had attended, to launch an American arm of its investigation. The Tribunals call for an American investigation led to what became the Vietnam Veterans Against the Wars Winter Soldier investigation, which prompted the Senate hearings that propelled John Kerry to fame. (Later as Senator Kerry would hire former Dispatch News Service bureau chief Gareth Porter to be his legislative aide.)
After running Hershs My Lai story and covering Kerrys war crimes allegations, the Times and IPS helped Pentagon consultant Daniel Ellsberg leak The Pentagon Papers, a selectively-edited account of US policy in Vietnam calculated to discredit the US war effort. In addition to damaging the US war effort, The Pentagon Papers also had a double effect, for in an effort to counter Ellsbergs propaganda efforts, the White House staff authorized a series of illegal surveillance actions that ultimately led to the Watergate scandal and President Nixons resignation.
Exhibit D: Undermining American Counterintelligence Capability
In the wake of Watergate, the Times and liberal elements in the CIA capitalized on the scandal by using it as a pretext to push for a reorganization of the intelligence community along liberal lines. This push was triggered by a leak from CIA Director William Colby to Seymour Hersh, which resulted in a December 22, 1974 New York Times article titled Huge C.I.A. Operation Reported in U.S. Against Anti-War Forces. Although there was a real story of actual abuses to be told here, Hershs article and follow-up allegations later proved exaggerated. But Hershs article served Colbys purpose. Colby used the leak to force the resignation of counterintelligence veteran James Angleton, the bastion of hard-line anti-Communism in the CIA. Meanwhile Congressional contacts of the antiwar movement called for investigations into Hershs allegations. These investigations culminated in the recommendation of sweeping reforms of the intelligence community.
The implementation of these reforms over 1976 and 1977 took the form of a systematic stripping of US counterintelligence capability. This included abolishing Congressional and Department of Justice bodies assigned to monitor subversive activity, eliminating the internal security branch of the FBI's intelligence division, and dismissing several hundred of the CIAs experts on Communism. Antiwar leaders such as Ramsey Clark tried to push this even further by promoting legislation which would have virtually eliminated the FBI, but this effort failed.
Historians of the intelligence community have traced a direct line from these so-called reforms to the intelligence communitys failure to prevent the 9/11 attacks. And it is not hard to see how Hershs allegation of the CIAs domestic spying operations stands as a prototype for James Risens allegation of NSA domestic spying operations. The Times is up to its old tricks again.
An exhaustive list of instances when the New York Times has endangered national security over the past half century would take many more pages, but the point has been made. Enough is enough. The Times blatant subversion of the United States under the guise of a twisted interpretation of the Constitutional right to free speech needs to end. The Constitutional guarantee to freedom of speech depends first and foremost on the existence of the United States, and that existence is now being jeopardized by an Orwellian rag run by morally warped propagandists who think betraying their country is a badge of honor and who will stoop to any depth of deceit in order to sidestep whatever laws or constitutional processes stand in the way of their unelected agenda. Our Constitution makes room for three branches of government. It delegates no authority whatsoever to a fourth estate, much less a fifth column. Its time for our elected officials and the American people to tell the Times that time is up.
Ambrose, Stephen E. Eisenhower: Soldier and President. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990.
Lynch, Grayston L. Decision for Disaster: Betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. Washington: Brasseys, 1998.
Newsworkers: Toward a History of the Rank and File. Edited by Hanno Hardt and Bonnie Brennen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.
Powell, S. Steven. Covert Cadre: Inside the Institute for Policy Studies. Introduction by David Horowitz. Ottawa, Illinois: Green Hill Publishers, Inc., 1987.
Riebling, Mark. Wedge: The Secret War Between the FBI and CIA. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994.
Stepan-Norris, Judith and Zeitlin, Maurice. Left Out: Reds and Americas Industrial Unions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Tifft, Susan E. and Jones, Alex S. The Trust: The Private and Powerful Family Behind The New York Times. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1999.
Wannall, W. Raymond. Undermining Counterintelligence Capability. CI Centre. http://www.cicentre.com/Documents/DOC_Wannall_Undermining_Intel.htm
Wells, Tom. Wild Man: The Life and Times of Daniel Ellsberg. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
bump for a later read. Impressive stuff! Good job!
Nice piece of work!
Well done. You've named the usual suspects and connected the dots. Memories are short, and many are new to politics. The Press has received a free pass for far too long. Demanding accountability is NOT a violation of the First Amendment.
I appreciate your effort that goes into a piece like this.
Reading is fast, putting something like this together takes time and research. - tom
I agree the NYT sucks and is complicit in traitorous/treasonous acts, but it can't divulge secrets that others don't first leak to it. We really need to prosecute these folks.
An exhaustive list of instances when the New York Times has endangered national security over the past half century....
Absolutely. This needs to be trumpeted to every citizen over and over until these anti-American, communist-loving leftists are out of business in America.
Got about a third of the way through, printing it up for the train ride home, darn fine peice of work otta you!Owl_Eagle
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
Great job!! BTTT!!
"Exhibit A: Compromising the U-2
"In early 1960 Alsop wrote a story for the New York Times hinting at US knowledge of secret Soviet missile developments."
The NYT can be held to blame for a lot of bad things--except this one. The Russians knew about the U-2 from its first flight over the USSR--they were really PO'd about it for 4 years, until they finally shot one down. (They were filing all kinds of diplomatic protests until May 1st, 1960, when they simply said "Who's yer daddy?")
The Times also managed to bury the story of the Holocaust.
It managed to "puff" the story of Abu Ghraib; mentioning it somewhere on the front page for more than 30 consecutive days.
It put the Holocaust on page 27 o 28 (IIRC), and mentioned it in one story (perhaps more later)
What would have happened had it stressed the Holocaust on the front page for 30 consecutive days? Instead, it was "spiked",
given just enough mention so that the paper could claim to have reported on it, but nothing more.
Also, the Pentagon Papers publication must be remembered.
NYT traitors have a special place in Hell!
Outstanding work, thanks!!!!!!!
Unfortunately, I have no confidence that anything will ever be done about the treasonous charlatans of the NY Times. Best we can hope for is to educate enough of the public so that the influence of such anti-American weasels may be limited........
It would not surprise me if they knew about it before that, though I'd need to see whether what they knew included what Alsop revealed in his article, which referred to a specific missile installation. However there are many unresolved historical issues surrounding the downing of Powers' flight and whether he was simply shot down as reported or whether some type of espionage was involved. In any case, the goal of Alsop's article was to score PR points against Eisenhower by putting him in a position where he could not refute an allegation without revealing classified information, for which the NYT can be blamed independently of whether the Soviets already had information about the U-2, IMO.
Interesting, well researched article.
This says it all right here:
"To what extent these attempts to purge Communist elements from the Times were successful is unknown.'
Fact is, they were NOT successful, at the Slimes or at the Globe, or any of today's leftist rags.
Any effort to promote global socialist/communist agendas will be tolerated, including pro-terrorism, treason, manufacturing stories, yellow- and checkbook-journalism, political scams, smears and entrapment, Goebbels would be proud of their tactics.
I like another's comments here: Accountability is NOT a violation of the 1st Amendment.
Thanks for mentioning the Glomar incident--I considered including that but didn't want to get too long. In that case Hersh went ahead with the article after CIA Director Colby specifically asked him not to.
With all the scandals originating from this newspaper, why does it still stay in business? How long is enough is enough?
Old Grey Hooker Ping!
This is excellent, Fedora. Very nice!
"However there are many unresolved historical issues surrounding the downing of Powers' flight and whether he was simply shot down as reported or whether some type of espionage was involved."
All accounts we have indicate that the Russians threw EVERYTHING they could at Powers' U-2, and managed to bag several of their own MiGs in the process. We sent Powers on a last grand tour of Russia's most heavily defended sites, on a mission that would have spent 12 hours over hostile territory (flight plan was Pakistan to Norway), so the risk level was far higher than it ever had been. Espionage may have played a role--but the level of risk was frightfully high, even if the Russians had no idea it was coming. Again, State was getting detailed complaints from the Russians (time of flight, altitude, and locations overflown) from the first mission. Lockheed spent considerable time and energy on trying to make the Dragon lady stealthy--they found they could, but only by slowing it down and lowering its airspeed.
Link doesn't work for some reason.
The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.
And that is "THE" mystery.. And the ONLY question thats NEVER asked is, are you a communist or just a socialist since communism "IS" socialism..
Sounds like you've researched the U-2 a bit :-) Interesting.
Richard Bissell's memoirs claimed that Powers' flight had been compromised during a layover in Peshawar.
A great rehash of how the Times and implied, how other MSM ally themselves with the Dem-leftists to undermine the military, the national security, of course , W, with just plain lying. Rush today had a list of how the lefty Dems employed such a list of wrongheaded national security gaffes in their determination to cut and run for the last 50 years!! You cannot trust the MSM nor can we ever trust the lefty-Dems in securing our protection. The Dems are near Petain, wussies, Quislings as any in our history nowadays when it comes to national security.
Marking for later. Thanks for the work...
Marking to read later.
Sorry , I must have messed the coding. Let's try it this way ~
The Origins of Political Correctness ~ An Accuracy in Academia Address by Bill Lind http://www.academia.org/lectures/lind1.html
A Must Read:
Vastly Illuminating, September 25, 2004
|Reviewer:||Kat Bakhu (Albuquerque, NM United States) - See all my reviews
One does wish for the return of real newspapers. The NYT was not allowed in many Republican homes in my youth because of their blatant pro-communism.
At least in those days there were other papers. Now we have the Washington Times and ....
I'm going to look for that book. Thanks.