Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Swinger's club draws opposition
Wisconsin News ^ | 12-19-05

Posted on 12/19/2005 6:16:18 PM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
---No building permits have been issued for the structure, and they are required by Adams County.

---no well or septic permits have been issued.

---The county has not inspected the place because it does not have a certified commercial building inspector.

But as the owners likely know, important for a town of less than 700

The downside of fighting the club's operation would be that if the town loses it would have to pay the club's attorney fees, he said. That could be as high as $500 per hour and could reach $600,000 or more.

1 posted on 12/19/2005 6:16:18 PM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Don't know if it's worth a ping.


2 posted on 12/19/2005 6:16:51 PM PST by SJackson (There's no such thing as too late, that's why they invented death. Walter Matthau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Time to put on some Sinatra records.


3 posted on 12/19/2005 6:18:09 PM PST by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

They're life's losers. Let em swing and save the hassle, taxpayers bucks, etc...Who really cares?


4 posted on 12/19/2005 6:23:05 PM PST by kcar (theUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Trash talking in the parking lot? What no pictures?


5 posted on 12/19/2005 6:23:52 PM PST by claptrap (optional tag-line under reconsideration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The club is listed on the Web site of NASCA, an organization for those who enjoy the "swinging" lifestyle. In a question and answer section on that group's Web site the lifestyle is described as primarily for couples who enjoy sex with those who are not their partners

My ex-wife didn't need a fancy "club".

6 posted on 12/19/2005 6:25:54 PM PST by neodad (Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kcar

I do.
BTTT


7 posted on 12/19/2005 6:26:50 PM PST by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

Why do you care? I'd really like to understand why people want to stop these things. I know it's easier to explain to children that certain people aren't right as rain when they are banished from view, but that ain't forever and maybe the visibility today is better left to a parent's explanations then to a dial-it-futureward strategy.


8 posted on 12/19/2005 6:37:16 PM PST by kcar (theUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

"On the local club's Web site, it says that single men need a sponsor for admission. Single women and couples apparently don't. "

Is gender discrimination at a public business legal? Didn't some bars get in trouble for having different prices for men and women?


9 posted on 12/19/2005 6:38:06 PM PST by gondramB (Rightful liberty is unobstructed action within limits of the equal rights of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson; odoso; animoveritas; Laissez-faire capitalist; bellevuesbest; Unam Sanctam; EdReform; ...

Moral Absolutes Ping.

Free speeh? Free speech should be what it was intended to mean - the spoken and written word.

Isn't it amazing to what vile depths our country has sunk? So a club dedicated to fornication and adultery can open where ever it wants, in a regular neighborhood, breaking local rules, and already plans to fight, hoping to break the bank of the small town?

I know I'm bad, but I say gas can and lighter.

Or local people walking up and down in front of it with camberas and signs 24/7. Signs like "We don't want an adultery and fornication club in our town".

Ask yourself - why is illicit sex now holy and protected? What happened in the last couple of generations? And if anyone thinks that wild sexual behavior does not have terrible ramifications, such a person is eiather an adolescent in age or emotional maturity.

Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.


10 posted on 12/19/2005 6:40:30 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

I knew a couple that went to bars and whichever partner got picked up the other went home and watched. Weird folks but they are still partners. They own a used car lot. I guess you could say "Think Used"


11 posted on 12/19/2005 6:42:41 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (The alphabet channels --spying for the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Weeell.. A gas can and lighter might be an actual violation of the First Amendment. Let me see here. Yes I think it is! But protesting the place with cameras and signs might be an expression of your First Amendment rights. Yes - I think there's a real difference to your proposed solutions there...


12 posted on 12/19/2005 6:48:08 PM PST by kcar (theUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kcar; battlegearboat; claptrap; neodad; sarasmom; gondramB; little jeremiah; sgtbono2002
Why do you care? I'd really like to understand why people want to stop these things.

Because they care about their lousy little rural Wisconsin town.

These guys may have picked the wrong site. Six or seven years ago Perrier, after being turned down for a water plant site west of Milwaukee (??) decided they'd head for the sticks where no one could afford the legal fees. They picked New Haven, where the citizens didn't want a water plant. After a fight of several years, which included a recall of several town officials which the New York Times (??) addressed as anarchy, Perrier gave up their plans and built in Michigan.

13 posted on 12/19/2005 6:49:41 PM PST by SJackson (There's no such thing as too late, that's why they invented death. Walter Matthau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Wow - they own the whole (lousy rural Wisconsin) town? Simple then - just don't go there it will shrivel up and die. I don't like VHS - gone! Off the channel rotation even. Maybe it's still care maybe I don't care.


14 posted on 12/19/2005 6:55:24 PM PST by kcar (theUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Club WetSpot

Classy. : )

15 posted on 12/19/2005 7:00:01 PM PST by TheBigB ("Hey, barkeep, whose leg do you have to hump to get a dry martini around here?"--Brian Griffin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcar
Why do you care? I'd really like to understand why people want to stop these things.

I think all of these kind of places should be built right beside the homes of folks who think as you do.

16 posted on 12/19/2005 7:01:22 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Image hosted by Photobucket.com the "Swingers Club" round here in the 70's was a small hotel and bar where after getting sufficiently liquored up the women all went to their rooms and the keys were all put into a hat that the men drew from...
17 posted on 12/19/2005 7:03:51 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

Property is the root of all freedoms. I don't own the town I live in, only a single plot within it. That one's mine. So that's all I control. Should such an enterprise move nearby, values will have declined a decade in advance such that I will have moved. Just like changing the channel.


18 posted on 12/19/2005 7:06:07 PM PST by kcar (theUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kcar
NIMBY.

And definitely not when it is already against the law in that community.
If you want what is universally described as licentious and immoral "sexual freedom" in the "privacy of your own bedroom" and are all consenting adults, fine.
If you choose to make your "private sexual choices obnoxiously public", the public has the right to denounce your obnoxious choices as abhorrent to existing community standards, and unwelcome.
It becomes my business when you make your private sexual practices public.
No, I do not have to pretend I think sexual perverts are normal. Nor must I tolerate sexual perverts conducting sexual acts in public.
Why do you think I should?
19 posted on 12/19/2005 7:09:24 PM PST by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kcar
Property is the root of all freedoms.

Agreed.

I don't own the town I live in, only a single plot within it. That one's mine. So that's all I control. Should such an enterprise move nearby, values will have declined a decade in advance such that I will have moved. Just like changing the channel.

But I thought enterprises like this were victimless??

20 posted on 12/19/2005 7:14:37 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson