[sarasmom]

NIMBY.

And definitely not when it is already against the law in that community.
If you want what is universally described as licentious and immoral "sexual freedom" in the "privacy of your own bedroom" and are all consenting adults, fine.
If you choose to make your "private sexual choices obnoxiously public", the public has the right to denounce your obnoxious choices as abhorrent to existing community standards, and unwelcome.
It becomes my business when you make your private sexual practices public.
No, I do not have to pretend I think sexual perverts are normal. Nor must I tolerate sexual perverts conducting sexual acts in public.
Why do you think I should?

[kcar]

It just goes by who owns the property. Unless they are conducting acts of licentiousness in public, well then that could be different. Is that what's being alleged? Or rather, are they just charging money for this business, which is necessarily "public" because the government inserts itself more anywhere where money changes hands to tax whatever activity caused that to happen?

[little jeremiah]

Excellent points, well said.

[rzeznikj at stout]

Excellent points!!

I agree completely. Though unfortunately, it is up to the locals to decide. Just pray there aren't any Machiavellian hoodlums running the township board.