Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada greets 'Karla' with outrage
Buffalo News ^ | 1/21/06 | Anne Neville

Posted on 01/21/2006 11:56:21 AM PST by Dane

Canada greets 'Karla' with outrage By ANNE NEVILLE NEWS STAFF REPORTER 1/21/2006

Laura Prepon has the title role in "Karla," a film that will open in the Buffalo area later this year.

Karla Homolka served 12 years in prison and was released last summer amid a storm of public opposition.

For Western New Yorkers who remember the early 1990s Ontario sex slayings by Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka, the movie "Karla" may shed light on the psyche of an unlikely and vicious killer.

But Michael Sellers, the film's Los Angeles-based producer and writer, is finding that people in Ontario are so outraged by Karla Homolka that they have condemned the film without seeing it.

In a telephone interview from Toronto before "Karla" opened Friday in 82 theaters across Canada, Sellers said, "What's happening up here is that a lot of people are just fixating on the part that comes from her point of view, and it just makes them crazy, because they hate her so much."

The movie is not being shown in St. Catharines, where Homolka and Bernardo abducted, raped, tortured and killed Leslie Mahaffy, 14, in 1991, and Kristen French, 15, in 1992. The pair also killed Homolka's younger sister by drugging her to rape her in 1990.

The film, which stars Laura Prepon, who currently plays Donna on "That '70s Show," and Misha Collins, is expected to open later this year in Buffalo, which close but emotionally more distant" from the case.

Sellers said he decided to make "Karla" after the success of the film "Monster," the true story of serial killer Eileen Wuornos, for which Charlize Theron won a Best Actress Oscar.

"In all this controversy up here, and criticism, they talk about (us) being opportunistic, and yeah, I'm an independent producer, and I look at "Monster' and think, "Wow, I could make that movie for the kind of budget that I have to work with, and yet the film could be good and go far.' " said Sellers.

"Karla" is based largely on transcripts of an in-depth psychiatric interview Homolka underwent eight years into her prison term. Although Homolka was denied parole at that time, she was freed in July after serving 12 years. Homolka got the relatively light sentence in exchange for testifying against Bernardo, but prosecutors said that if videotapes the killers made of the attacks had been found earlier, Homolka would have been charged with murder.

Sellers said that using the transcripts of the psychiatric interview "gives us the ability for Karla to narrate, which this kind of a story needs . . . but unlike "Monster,' she wasn't allowed to narrate unimpeded, she is challenged by the psychiatrist. Karla is such a manipulator, and if you're going to depict her accurately, she'll be manipulating the audience."

Sellers said Christal Films, the Montreal-based film distributor, "thought about opening it in Buffalo now, but they didn't because it's just so close to St. Catharines it would be like putting it there. We wanted to avoid that, so it'll be later after the dust has settled."

The outcry against the film was so strong that Montreal's annual World Film Festival withdrew its invitation after pressure from the festival's sponsors. Sellers said "Karla" will be shown at film festivals in Santa Barbara and Cleveland, "and one way or another it'll be out in the U.S. later in the spring."

Ingrid Hamilton, an independent Toronto publicist who is working with Christal Films, said 45 people attended the 1:30 p.m. screening Friday at one downtown Toronto theater, "and that is a lot on a weekday. So I think that's a sign that it will probably bring people out."

The film was panned by the Toronto Globe and Mail reviewer.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: canada; hollyweird
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
Liberal hollyweird glorifying murderers again.
1 posted on 01/21/2006 11:56:22 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dane
"Sellers said he decided to make "Karla" after the success of the film "Monster," the true story of serial killer Eileen Wuornos, for which Charlize Theron won a Best Actress Oscar"

I wish that no one could be allowed to profit in such ways from heinous crimes.... if such worthless films, books, etc. have to be produced, can't we require that all proceeds go to charity? Anyone know how some state laws have fared which bar criminals from profiting from re-telling their crimes in books and films?
2 posted on 01/21/2006 11:59:49 AM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Liberal hollyweird glorifying murderers again.

Yet, Liberal Canada screams when their ox is gored.

I love seeing Liberal duplicity exposed.

3 posted on 01/21/2006 12:00:07 PM PST by freedumb2003 (American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Waiting for the "humanizing" film about the Beltway murderers. Wonder how that will play out.


4 posted on 01/21/2006 12:01:11 PM PST by Clock King ("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

I know people have diarrhea...does that mean they have to make a movie about it? I know people pick their noses and eat it...does that mean they have to make a movie about it? ENOUGH...We don't need to know the INSIGHT into these monsters. It just humanizes them.


5 posted on 01/21/2006 12:01:16 PM PST by Hildy (Spielberg spends his spare time memorializing the last Holocaust while working to justify the next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Wanna hear something really scary?

Karla was released last July, and is now free walking the streets somewhere.


6 posted on 01/21/2006 12:05:01 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Every competent and professional analysis of Karla Homolks basically said the same thing, i.e. that she was another extreme case of psychological conditioning and control like the case of Patty Hearst and the appeals judge threw out the 810.2 conditions for good reason. The doctors who first got their hands on Karla after she broke up with Bernardo said she was the worst case of abuse they had ever seen and compared her to a death-camp survivor. The Canadian media is every bit as bad as their government; caveat emptor.


7 posted on 01/21/2006 12:05:42 PM PST by darkocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"What's happening up here is that a lot of people are just fixating on the part that comes from her point of view, and it just makes them crazy, because they hate her so much."

Strikes me that Canadians by and large have about the same morals as Paul and Karla. I'm surprised she hasn't been elected to public office.

8 posted on 01/21/2006 12:07:00 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Why anyone would want to go and see this movie is beyond me.


9 posted on 01/21/2006 12:08:25 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

You hit the nail on the head, Hildy. (And I love your tagline, too.)


10 posted on 01/21/2006 12:14:08 PM PST by Calico Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
I wish that no one could be allowed to profit in such ways from heinous crimes.... if such worthless films, books, etc. have to be produced, can't we require that all proceeds go to charity? Anyone know how some state laws have fared which bar criminals from profiting from re-telling their crimes in books and films?

California enacted the "Son of Sam" law in the 1980's which banned felons from profiting with books or movies but their SC struck it down in 2002 (typical idiocy).

Nevada passed a similar law that met the same fate. They see it as a violation of free speech. Odd, isn't it? They can be denied their liberty and the pursuit of happiness (locked up in jail) - thank God some liberal judge hasn't ruled incarceration unconstitutional.

Once we're rid of these idiots I'd like to see laws passed that give the proceeds to the victims or their families instead of charity.
11 posted on 01/21/2006 12:19:12 PM PST by Jaysun (The plain truth is that I am not a fair man, and don't want to hear both sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Abortion?
Homosexuality?
Divorce?
Bestiality?
Okay but.....I guess this is just toooo much for them. I thought they were just exercising their God given rights to live as they see fit.
12 posted on 01/21/2006 12:28:12 PM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ThisLittleLightofMine
. I thought they were just exercising their God given rights to live as they see fit.

Hey, watch that Hate Speech!!!

</sarc>

13 posted on 01/21/2006 12:31:18 PM PST by freedumb2003 (American troops cannot be defeated. American Politicians can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mears

"Why anyone would want to go and see this movie is beyond me."

I can barely stand reading about her in the news.


14 posted on 01/21/2006 12:34:18 PM PST by msjhall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative


She needs to be hunted down. And be given the same treatment that she dished out to her victims.


15 posted on 01/21/2006 12:34:55 PM PST by JRochelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

LOL! You hit it square and center.


16 posted on 01/21/2006 12:58:31 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (The problem with being a 'big tent' Party is that the clowns are seated with the paying customers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dane

17 posted on 01/21/2006 1:31:10 PM PST by Boazo (From the mind of BOAZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkocean
Every competent and professional analysis of Karla Homolks basically said the same thing, i.e. that she was another extreme case of psychological conditioning and control like the case of Patty Hearst and the appeals judge threw out the 810.2 conditions for good reason. The doctors who first got their hands on Karla after she broke up with Bernardo said she was the worst case of abuse they had ever seen and compared her to a death-camp survivor. The Canadian media is every bit as bad as their government; caveat emptor.

That brings up an interesting problem. I've always maintained that guilt should be judged according to causation rather than intent.

I guess I would stick with that standard in this case and all others (except self defense, war, most accidents).

First, if one of the reasons for punishment is to protect the public then intent or motivation is irrelevant. Second, all crimes are justifiable in the criminal's mind for one reason or another or they wouldn't do it. Why should it matter if they're driven to that justification by greed, lust, hunger, hatred, or because they're irrational (insane)?
18 posted on 01/21/2006 1:32:39 PM PST by Jaysun (The plain truth is that I am not a fair man, and don't want to hear both sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Strikes me that Canadians by and large have about the same morals as Paul and Karla. I'm surprised she hasn't been elected to public office.

Incredible

19 posted on 01/21/2006 1:38:18 PM PST by kanawa (Freaking panty wetting, weakspined bliss-ninny socialist punks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kanawa
Incredible

Unbelievably Incredible

20 posted on 01/21/2006 1:45:11 PM PST by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson