Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Truth About the Homosexual Rights Movement (Caution, graphic contents)
New Oxford Review ^ | February 9, 2006 | Ronald G. Lee

Posted on 02/09/2006 8:10:43 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-208 next last
To: NYer

ping


181 posted on 05/25/2006 1:09:23 PM PDT by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts soooo good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

bump to find later


182 posted on 06/07/2006 2:41:25 PM PDT by rusty millet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusty millet

Bumping for current relevance....


183 posted on 10/06/2006 9:03:56 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Seems like a good time to get this one back into circulation...


184 posted on 10/06/2006 9:04:24 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

An oldie but goodie for you....


185 posted on 10/06/2006 9:04:43 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Don't know if you saw this one the first time around.


186 posted on 10/06/2006 9:05:55 AM PDT by Antoninus (Attention GOP---Rule 4: See Rules 1 and 3. Rule 5: NO FOLEYS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I guess you saw I'm kind of back on the job!

Will pingify in a while if no one else does, thank you.


187 posted on 10/06/2006 9:36:02 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Heyworth

I work in a creative field as well. I know many gay men and some seem to be in monogamous relationships - although who knows. What is depressing is the large amount of gay men I know - many of them intelligent, talented people - who despite their advanced years still party too hard, take drugs and overdo the alcohol, fret about greying hair and extra pounds, and keep hoping to meet that hairless blond 17 year old boy.


188 posted on 10/06/2006 10:27:21 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Balke; BigFinn; BlackElk; BlessedBeGod; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

I think this one got missed a few months ago, Antoninus noticed I'm back on the job (kind of) and alerted me to it.

Graphic, but truthful. People who don't know the truth about the "gay life" need to know. Pretending it doesn't exist is what has allowed homosexual activists and their supporters to gain the power they have.

It's time to fight for what's right, and being armed with knowledge is vital.

Freepmail me and/or wagglebee if you want on/off this pinglist.


189 posted on 10/06/2006 9:18:03 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; All
WOW some excellent comment on this thread. I see some new names even! Wonderful to see.

Terrific article too. Worth the read. Kudos to you all
190 posted on 10/07/2006 8:25:29 AM PDT by gidget7 (Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

bump


191 posted on 01/04/2007 10:50:52 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: NYer

bump for later read. new to me.


192 posted on 01/04/2007 1:33:56 PM PST by jjm2111 (http://www.purveryors-of-truth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Give me a break already the only one pushing the conspiracy angle is you. I've been in places that sell (presumably heterosexual) porn in the same way. When I was in high school we had a video store two blocks from my house that had almost nothing but crappy VHS tapes from the 80's, most of which no one has ever heard of or were so bad no one would watch them today (Unless you consider 'Attack of the Killer Tomatoes' and it's sequels real classics). At the back of the store there was a non-descript metal door labelled adult labelled in small lettering, "adults only." not surprisingly thats where most of the customers headed. A few of my more shameless friends decided to check it out shortly after they turned 18 and I can assure you they were selling what anyone with any common sense would think they sold in back (I have my doubts that would include you).

I later lived in another town that had a porn shop move in, people protested in front of the shop every day, some even resorted to vandalism and shooting out windows to make their point. The shop didn't last 4 months. Why is it so surprising that someone would put hide that sort of thing in the back, or that it would constitute the vast majority of their business? It's not like it takes a rocket scientist or the CIA to throw a few Oscar Wilde books out front.


193 posted on 01/04/2007 6:16:57 PM PST by Thoramir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Thoramir

I vaguely recall that one-year-old post to which you replied. The article that I derided as crap then, is still crap now.


194 posted on 01/04/2007 7:24:17 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I have no recollection who you are or what article you are talking about. I'm not so much of a looser that I have to worry about 1 year old posts and I can't pretty much guarantee I won't remember this thread next year while you are still stewing in your juices about it. I've never posted a single article here, so why bother me about it? I don't really give a crap about whatever personal problems you might have with other posters.


195 posted on 01/04/2007 8:17:48 PM PST by Thoramir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Thoramir

Correction: ". . .and I can pretty much guarantee. . ."


196 posted on 01/04/2007 8:18:50 PM PST by Thoramir (Free Republic still needs an edit feature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor

Does this poor lost soul have any positive male role models? Has your husband taken a moment to talk with him? Sometimes all these young misguided boys need is someone to tell them it's alright to be a man and there is nothing wrong with masculinity.

God Bless


197 posted on 01/04/2007 8:26:23 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: One Proud Dad

Some people are born with physical defects. My nephew, for example, was born with a bad lower intestine and as a result has a colostomy bag.

I believe that some people can be born with emotional defects, a disposition toward same-sex attraction. There's nothing necessarily sinful about the disposition, but there is something wrong about it, and sinful about acting on it.

People can be born with this same-sex attraction defect, which can be treated like any physical or emotional defect. Or they can develop it just as someone can develop a broken leg through some sort of accident.

Not sure the argument that it's "a choice" is beneficial to anyone, especially those struggling to escape that lifestyle.


198 posted on 01/04/2007 9:28:35 PM PST by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thoramir
I have no recollection who you are or what article you are talking about. I'm not so much of a looser that I have to worry about 1 year old posts and I can't pretty much guarantee I won't remember this thread next year while you are still stewing in your juices about it. I've never posted a single article here, so why bother me about it? I don't really give a crap about whatever personal problems you might have with other posters.

Let's review the bidding, shall we?

You're the one who responded to my year-old post, and now you're all pissy because I replied to you? My, my, my.....

199 posted on 01/05/2007 6:09:44 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Oh crap, THIS is the year old thread. I thought you were moaning about something I had written a year ago in some thread that you had for whatever reason expected me to remember. Someone must've bumped it to the top of the list and I mistook it for being new. I knew that I needed to get a new pair of glasses, but I didn't think my eyes were getting so bad that I'd make a complete jackass of myself. For whatever it's worth, I'm sorry I acted like such an idiot.


200 posted on 01/05/2007 10:03:23 AM PST by Thoramir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson