Skip to comments.
A fresh focus on domestic partners (Focus on the Family supports gay rights bill)
The Denver Post Online ^
| 02/06/2006 01:00:00 AM
| Editorial board
Posted on 02/09/2006 12:55:09 PM PST by Terriergal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Compromise is everywhere.
To: Terriergal
I am really shocked by this. Does Dr. Dobson know about this?
2
posted on
02/09/2006 12:57:00 PM PST
by
mlc9852
To: shaggy eel; My2Cents; jumpdrive; Calvert Cliffs Cafe; RnMomof7; Cyrano; Manfred the Wonder Dawg; ...
How do you decide who is 'head of household'???
3
posted on
02/09/2006 12:58:37 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("My conscience is captive to the word of God...here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God." ML)
To: Terriergal
The best way to collapse a system is to keep piling it on till it flattens under it's own weight..
Remember though ..while you are lookin' out for #1.. don't step in #2
4
posted on
02/09/2006 1:00:05 PM PST
by
joesnuffy
(A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
To: mlc9852; NYer
5
posted on
02/09/2006 1:00:12 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("My conscience is captive to the word of God...here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God." ML)
To: Terriergal
To: joesnuffy
7
posted on
02/09/2006 1:00:42 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("My conscience is captive to the word of God...here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God." ML)
To: Terriergal
I think we should take th word for it rather than invite examples of why.
8
posted on
02/09/2006 1:01:20 PM PST
by
x5452
To: lilylangtree
I have the same reaction. Then again, Dobson never claimed to be a theologian, he's far too interested in the 'relationship' side of things and sounds like he's getting dragged off course by that as well as most of the evangelical church nowadays.
9
posted on
02/09/2006 1:01:37 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("My conscience is captive to the word of God...here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God." ML)
To: Terriergal
Why do I have doubts about this? I somehow think there is more to this story than is being told.
10
posted on
02/09/2006 1:02:24 PM PST
by
Racer1
To: x5452
yeah... I'm with you. But then, we shouldn't have to decide either of them as head of household. Maybe the kids (shudder) will be heads of household. It'd make just as much sense.
11
posted on
02/09/2006 1:02:30 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("My conscience is captive to the word of God...here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God." ML)
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: mlc9852
Calm down people. This is totally false. Dobson has emphatically refuted it.
13
posted on
02/09/2006 1:06:23 PM PST
by
Mulch
(tm)
To: Terriergal
I'm not in the least surprised by this. About ten years ago or so I decided to join Focus on The Family and was sent a form to read and sign. As I read along I came to a part that excluded members who follow the Papacy, (can't remember its exact wording, but it was crystal clear what it meant). So much for the 'good' Dr. Dobson. I mentally dumped him into the trash bin along with his membership form.
14
posted on
02/09/2006 1:09:19 PM PST
by
TheCrusader
("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
To: Terriergal
The Business of Religion proves yet again that it's bottom line is political support, not biblical Chrisitanity.
Really, should we be surpirsed?
But, here is a new idea, if homosexual "marrage" is against current law, what "rights" do lawbreakers have? To a fair and speedy trial.
To: mlc9852
16
posted on
02/09/2006 1:12:20 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("My conscience is captive to the word of God...here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God." ML)
To: Terriergal
These folk who think they can redefine what God created (marriage) are only kidding themselves. They can only end up with the pagan leadership that Christ admonished His followers was not of His kingdom. If we love the Lord, we will follow His commands. He created male and female and He created marriage between one of each of these. Period. within that institution, He has established the hierarchy (Ephesians 5) and we cannot shy away from it.
To: spaatzcadet
Well, we of course don't enforce cohabitation or other anti-promiscuity laws that are on the books.
However this law will make it impossible for people to deny companies paying for the support of someone's current domestic partner under insurance policies and other legal contracts.
18
posted on
02/09/2006 1:15:37 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("My conscience is captive to the word of God...here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God." ML)
To: DirtyHarryY2K; DBeers
To: Terriergal
impossible for people to deny companies er... impossible for companies to deny
20
posted on
02/09/2006 1:16:26 PM PST
by
Terriergal
("My conscience is captive to the word of God...here I stand. I can do no other. So help me God." ML)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson