Bush vows ports deal will stand

Washington Times ^ | Feb. 22, 2006 | Joseph Curl

[GAB-1955]

Yes, but the 5% that is inspected is selected by processes that increase the chance of intercepting "goodies." The details are classified.

[bordergal]

You don't think that Muslim subcontractors and managers would become a more common sight?
After all, they'll be involved in port management.
More access.....

[Leonine]

Could these processes simply be observed day by day in toto at these six ports by DPW management more readily and comprehensively than piecemeal observation by isolated radical spies?

[spectre]

The White House should be more concerned with what they owe the American people, than losing face with their allies.

And what Bush OWE'S the American people is a total and thorough detailed explanation.

sw

[GAB-1955]

"Could these processes simply be observed day by day in toto at these six ports by DPW management more readily and comprehensively than piecemeal observation by isolated radical spies?"

No.

[Celtic Conservative]

No rush, hold up approval until some *checking* is done on the procedures for bidding, etc.(and when I say checking I mean a reasonable, thought out debate, NOT a congressional dog and pony show with the MSM cheering them on.)

CC