THE PORT DEAL - THIS COULD BE BUSH'S FIRST VETO? HE'S JOKING, RIGHT? (Boortz on Poortz)

Nealz Nuze ^ | 2/22/06 | Neal Boortz

[bert]

hey Neil...... Stupid has no cure but ignorance does. Educate yourself before shooting off your mouth and exposing your shallowness. World trade is above your paygrade. Silence would be thge best policy till the ignorance is remediated.

[ozoneliar]

Good article. Interesting points about the manifests, counters the arguements that "oh, the UAE will not be in a position to subvert security at all".

[MikefromOhio]

I;m pretty certain that he won't need to use a veto on this.

I figure that in two or 3 more days, the right will have recovered from there VERY liberal-like knee jerk initially on this issue. They will have re-examined it, and they will come to realize that nothing's really changed, except the name on the check......

The outrage will be gone. Whatever resolution comes up will either barely make it through congress and there will be a veto, but more likely, any resolution will die in committee.

It's about timing now and how quickly it will come about.

[Charlespg]

yes yes profit over everything /s

[bordergal]

And your credentials are???

[Mrs. Shawnlaw]

Great Britain is not an Islamic Nation.

I would beg to differ here. The British Empire has been taken over by the muzzies long ago. They own most of the property and business throughout.

[LibertarianInExile]

Nice rebuttal. You so effectively refute every point he raises. It's like a primer for how to dissect an argument logically! /sarc

Too bad you are such a typical supporter of the deal. Some of us would support the President here if he or his supporters could make a good case for the handover.

[LibertarianInExile]

Admittedly, I had a similar reaction, in light of another article recently posted--I think it was a Steyn piece, in fact--about the Muslim terrorists based in Britain were being seriously considered a threat for once.

However, Boortz is correct in that most British companies are not run by a Muslim state that supported the Taliban.

[newgeezer]

Search?

[HighlyOpinionated]

There just must be something here under the surface. Something unseen. Something undisclosed. The Bush White House just can't be this blind to the legitimate concerns of the people and of those in Congress who are concerned about this move.

Okay, I'll start.

1- Bush SUDDENLY decided that the US needed to 'wean itself off of oil' -- ahem, this from an OILMAN? My conjecture is that BUSH has been PAID OFF some how and some way. Follow the money.

2- Bush is acting 'dumb' to the clamor against the Nation of Muslim Caliphs as if it's a 'bigot' thing. FOLLOW THE MONEY.

3- Liberals will call Conservatives all kinds of names to try to shift the focus from ISLAM to anything else. However, SOME Liberals are looking at this with renewed vision. This issue may bring some Liberals and Conservatives together.

Follow the Money. What's the pay-off? Where is this going? I, for one, am afraid for my grandchildren.

Bush is acting like Andy Jackson did when the Cherokee won their lawsuit all the way to the Supreme Court, and he refused to abide by the decision.

Tell me where the money trail leads.

[takenoprisoner]

btw, if you get a praise allah from me, you are most likely a terrorist sympathizer or a terrorist yourself supporting muslim terrorists around the world. this is the internet and we intend to ferret you all out.

[LibertarianInExile]

I wish I could agree with you that the only thing changing is the name on the check. If that is true, why did no American company buy in? What made it so important for the UAE to buy in at a profit level evidently no American company found acceptable?

[LibertarianInExile]

I did search. I did not find it. If the thread is deleted, that's fine.

[MikefromOhio]

because there wasn't one INTERESTED?

The government should FORCE a company into a deal?

Since when is THAT a conservative ideal?

Look around, there was no American company interested in the deal.

[LibLieSlayer]

Hi Mike!

Brit played an interview clip of the U.S. Chief Operations Officer for DWP. He is a 60 something AMERICAN gentleman. He is not an Arab, and has been with the company many years.

The more we find out about this thing, the more we find that bull$hit and disinformation is exposed.

LLS

[Past Your Eyes]

Boortz is a puutz.

[MikefromOhio]

I guess so.

I didn't watch Brit tonight :)