Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Got Long Beach Deal (1997 - Clinton Deal)
The Daily Republican ^ | March 7, 1997 | Staff Investigative Journalists

Posted on 03/06/2006 5:57:32 AM PST by Bon mots

Chinese Got Long Beach Deal!

By Staff Investigative Journalists

LONG BEACH DESK - The Long Beach Naval Station was tentatively placed on the Military Base Closure-List by president George Bush in 1991. President Bill Clinton, closed the naval base last in 1993. That resulted in the loss to Long Beach, California of 17,500 military and civilian jobs. The economic impact of the of loss was $52.5 million and drove the California economy into the tank. It has never recovered.

Between 1995-1996, during the heat of the Clinton-Gore Campaign fund raising activity, the Clinton administration actively intervened to make sure a Communist Chinese cargo container shipping interest got a too-good deal on a Long Beach, California, shipping terminal.

The Secretary of the Navy has formally turned the base over to the City of Long Beach. But, the Port of Long Beach has signed a letter of intent to lease the property to the China Ocean Shipping Co., a steamship line run by the Communist Chinese government.

The Navy base property is about to be leased to a Communist China-owned shipping company under an agreement that was only made possible by the intervention of the White House.

 Forced by a court order, Port of Long Beach officials have now set March 12, 1997 for a new public hearing on plans to bulldoze the Naval Station and lease the property to the Comunist Chinese shipping company.

After a hearing before the court, a judge ruled last week that the deal had been rushed and proper procedures had not been in place.

Clinton was so eager to push the deal through that he met twice with Long Beach officials and once at a White House meeting in 1995 that included his then-chief of staff and the Pentagon's No. 2 official and others.

The deal finally approved by the Secretary of the Navy turns over control of the Long Beach Naval Station, with a value of at least $65 million, free of charge to the City of Long Beach. The city has agreed to lease it to the China Ocean Shipping Co. of the People's Republic of China.

The Chinese deal apparently went forward without a national security review by wither the CIA or National Security Council. The White House apparently avoided normal and routine government channels in pushing the deal through in 1995. '... there seemed to be no reason to check with the National Security Council on the decision ...' White House spokesman Lanny Davis said.

However, the China Ocean Shipping Co. of the People's Republic of China has been actively involved in several recent controversies in addition to a Russian AK-47 gun-smuggling episode on the streets of Oakland, California. In another shocking incident in December, one of the company's ships plowed into a crowded boardwalk in New Orleans, injuring 116 people.

Then, in 1992, the shipping company was fined $400,000 in a violation of U.S. shipping law in connection with is practices involving bribery of government officials in order to avoid paying U.S. tariffs on its imports at United States ports of entry.

There is still more. Six of the company's ships were detained by the Navy and Coast Guard for violating international safety regulations just in the last year. The Coast Guard said, that is has placed the China Ocean Shipping Co. of the People's Republic of China on a target list of shippers to monitor and search.

Last summer China admitted that the China Ocean Shipping Co. was shipping 640 tons of raw waste from the United States to China when it suddenly decided to dump it into the open sea.

In 1993 U.S. Navy shadowed a China Ocean Shipping Co. ship passing in the Persian Gulf after U.S. intelligence warned it was suspected of carrying chemical weapons materials.

CIA director Robert Gates has said ' ... any time you turn over an American port facility to a foreign-owned company, especially one with significant [Communist Chinese] government connection, then at least it ought to be vetted through national security agencies.'

A Navy Department career official said that no intelligence review was sought because the China Ocean Shipping Company's was not considered a security threat, by the Clinton White House.

The Chinese will lease the Long Beach Naval Station base for a 10 year term at a fee of $14.5 million per year. The Chinese will have the option to expand the perimeter of the operation onto another 150 acres of old Navy shipyards that will be developed at the City of Long Beach taxpayer's expense.

Officials at the Chinese shipping interest's headquarters in New Jersey and in Beijing refused to comment or respond to questions about president Clinton's involvement.




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: baddeal; chicoms; clinton; clintoncrimefamily; coaldetat; corruption; deplorables; hillary; jamesriady; klintoon; longbeachport; port; portgate; quidprocoal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Oh-oh. The Clintons have been getting away with this kind of crap for far too long.

Demogoguery/Hypocrisy 101

Image hosting by Photobucket
1 posted on 03/06/2006 5:57:36 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

I've been pointing it out for days.


2 posted on 03/06/2006 5:59:26 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Clintons have a long history of selling out national interests to well-heeled foreign governments. One of my favorite stories is how Hillary Clinton denied even knowing somebody by the name of Moctar Riady, yet later, photographs showed up with her speaking directly to him (see below). Photos also showed up with her husband Bill, Riady and John Huang a Chinese spy put into CIA briefings by the Clintons.

Tsk-tsk Hillaroo.

Image hosting by Photobucket

3 posted on 03/06/2006 6:00:38 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Howlin
Clinton was so eager to push the deal through that he met twice with Long Beach officials and once at a White House meeting in 1995 that included his then-chief of staff and the Pentagon's No. 2 official and others.

FYI ping

4 posted on 03/06/2006 6:01:10 AM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I've been pointing it out for days.

Yup. I know it's not a new find, but this old article adds to body of evidence pointing at the Clintons. There is some other good information in there about COSCO.

FR is a great repository of information for this kind of thing. Hopefully somebody out there will make good use of it.

5 posted on 03/06/2006 6:02:20 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
foreign money + avoiding legal procedures = clinton
6 posted on 03/06/2006 6:02:54 AM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

IMO (unrelated to topic), what is the message we are sending about our military and the need for a strong defense organization when BRAC is out there closing bases left and right? It goes beyond just letting enemies and potential enemies operate our ports, I think it sends the message that the DOD is not an important arm of the federal government. For MY money, the DOD carries far more weight than HUD, Dept. of Education, Ag. Dept and/or some of the others.


7 posted on 03/06/2006 6:04:21 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
Rescind the agreement! If we can't even run our own port terminals we're in trouble.

We should thank our "leaders" for enabling us to finally see exactly what is going on at our ports. We have been kept so busy watching the other acts that we forgot to consider that a smokescreen was put up around insidious schemes.

Send the Chinese and the muslims home; otherwise, we are like guests at a resort with our enemies mixing our cocktails and carrying in fresh towels while they are preparing to cut our throats.

Thanks Washington!

8 posted on 03/06/2006 6:04:26 AM PST by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Two wrongs don't make it right. (Though it does make the Clintons look like a greedy joke)
9 posted on 03/06/2006 6:06:44 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Yet Clinton could get away with anything because "the economy was good!" Because everyone knows when the economy is good, the president's popularity ratings are always high.

Oh wait....


10 posted on 03/06/2006 6:07:10 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy

Agree.


11 posted on 03/06/2006 6:09:31 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
Send the Chinese and the muslims home; otherwise, we are like guests at a resort with our enemies mixing our cocktails and carrying in fresh towels while they are preparing to cut our throats.

But, but,.. treason and free trade pay so well.....what is wrong with selling out your kids and neighbors for a fast buck...the market is willing to pay.
12 posted on 03/06/2006 6:09:38 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Just do an FR Search on COSCO. It's all there. Along with a vastly different Freeper reaction than the one fo the Dubai deal.


13 posted on 03/06/2006 6:11:05 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Along with a vastly different Freeper reaction than the one fo the Dubai deal.

Pssst....Pre-9/11.
14 posted on 03/06/2006 6:14:55 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FerdieMurphy
We have been kept so busy watching the other acts that we forgot to consider that a smokescreen was put up around insidious schemes.

I've been saying that Monica was spoon fed to us by the MSM for over two years while scumbag was dealing with the Chinese for money...whether campaign contributions,presidential library,land deals,or missile guidence systems...scumbag always got his....just as we see in Today's headlines

15 posted on 03/06/2006 6:15:50 AM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Along with a vastly different Freeper reaction than the one fo the Dubai deal.

I don't doubt that one bit.
16 posted on 03/06/2006 6:17:40 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

When they put up the poll
I said from the beginning
americans should run america
not foreigners
That is an explosion just waiting to happen


17 posted on 03/06/2006 6:19:17 AM PST by ziggy_dlo (freedom security:give up a little of either, you deserve neither liberalcracks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

The difference was the vehement protest of the COSCO deal, as compared to the lockstep support of the Dubai deal.


18 posted on 03/06/2006 6:20:14 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
That's Klinton economics. Sell out your country and line your pockets with petrodollars.

And now, even our el presidente! Shame!

19 posted on 03/06/2006 6:21:58 AM PST by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
And half of Utah is a federal park, but no people allowed.

The land was undermined with lifetimes of low-sulfur coal, but a deal was struck with the Chinese Communists to buy their low sulfur coal and bury the Utah land forever to mining.

20 posted on 03/06/2006 6:23:37 AM PST by FerdieMurphy (For English, Press One. (Tookie, you won the Pulitzer and Nobel prizes. Oh, too late.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson