Posted on 03/13/2006 10:27:46 AM PST by DBeers
"Today the lesbos would lay claim to me before I was out of diapers."
You and me too GG
Here is something to ponder on genetics. God said the sins of the father are passed on to his offspring. That made absolutely no sense to me until we learned more about genetics. If it turns out that destructive and addictive behaviors like boozing is genetic, why would not sex addictions be passed on genetically?
This boy is an example of how crazy parents can screw up their children, not an example of he's "born that way".
Crystal clear. They're clutching at straws.
a spectrum of "gayness"
here's a Specter of gayness
LOL!
Have there been any studies to look at sexual mis-orientation vis a vis parental relationships (divorce, single-parent home, emotional, psychological, sexual or physical abuse, etc.)? That seems to me to be where the real action happens.
Did Dan Rather provide the data??
LOL
Such is termed a hypothesis -in the case of this subject article generally and in the case of a genetic cause specifically for the homosexual disorder - an unproven hypotheis...
Can I ask a question here because I would be interested in hearing the membership's responses.
If it was proven fact down the line by the scientific community that homosexuality was hormonally induced, not genetically, nor a disorder of the mind - would the people here accept it as a physical anomaly - one which could not be affected or changed by the human, unless during the course of study, it is found that hormonal influence could be altered through application of medical treatment (even then not guaranteeing successful change)?
In other words if is a natural aberration in some to be born with a distinct hormonal impairment or one in which sexual identity does not equate with physical appearance..
could religious groups accept the scientific fact at some time in the future - or will homosexuals always be charged with "change" or "rejection"?
The "issue" regarding the cause of the homosexual disorder is an issue pushed by homosexual agenda advocates primarily as a 'reason' or 'justification' for the completely separate issue of sexual activity one participates in which is always a choice.
In other words --REGARDLESS if it is proven that there is a natural aberration in some to be born with a distinct hormonal impairment or whatever that predisposes some to engage in an activity that society rejects -Society will still reject the activity...
Thank you for your kind response. Last time I tried to ask questions here I was punished by many lol.... I know I am too curious for my own good.
Do you have another hypothesis on what may cause the chemical imbalance side of the equation? I've seen lots of theories on the behavorial aspect, but very few on the chemical side of things.
Thanks - I don't mind the hazing - I learn best when I have a question and ask it regardless of the return of exchanges.
Everyone has an opinion....which is good....what is also good is there are those who constantly seek to pick away at topics rather than accept the general line of pacification...
There are many aspects of sexuality which have been hidden, or changed over the evolution of man.... thinking here of the primate upright walking and the replacement (displacement) and size change of the sexual organs in both male and female to new positions to accommodate the new body design.
If there is a homosexual element in our development I would hope there will be enough curious humans over the future decades to get at the truth.
Nature herself has homosexuality activity in many animals - and while humans are not animals, and we do have the gift of decision-making and choice - I think nature wins the war over choice in some instances - and perhaps homosexuality is one choice which hasn't much of a chance. I don't know.
I figure questions are worth asking of learned members here, and don't mean to inflame people just want opinions - opinion is one of the few personal attributes we get to keep and nurture these days - we must guard them - but we must also be willing to look at what we perceive to be the "dark side" too on occasion, either to re-validate our own beliefs, or to update them.
Possible, but to me at least, not logical. Homosexuals, by definition, cannot reproduce, ergo a genetic predisposition cannot be passed along. Logically, the only way that it could be genetic is if it was an anomaly - the example that I used previously was 'Fragile-X'. Genetic anomalies are *very* rare in comparison to the incidence of homosexuality.
Unfortunately, my knowledge of both genetics and the endocrine system stops at High School anatomy.
Had an argument with a co-worker on this once...they thought that homosexuality was genetic and that societal pressures would influence gays to 'act straight'. Perhaps in today's society - but 30,000 years ago, did the same pressures exist? Possible, but I really don't think that it's likely.
Or, is homosexuality a relatively new (within the past 250 or so human generations) phenomenon?
Like I said before, the entire issue has become so politicized, that I doubt the answer will definitively be found, at least in my lifetime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.