Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Science Of Sexual Orientation (Mega Barf Alert!)
CBS News ^ | March 12, 2006 | Shari Finkelstein

Posted on 03/13/2006 10:27:46 AM PST by DBeers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last
To: Galveston Grl

"Today the lesbos would lay claim to me before I was out of diapers."

You and me too GG


61 posted on 03/13/2006 8:43:57 PM PST by gidget7 (Get GLDSEN out of our schools!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: utahagen

Here is something to ponder on genetics. God said the sins of the father are passed on to his offspring. That made absolutely no sense to me until we learned more about genetics. If it turns out that destructive and addictive behaviors like boozing is genetic, why would not sex addictions be passed on genetically?


62 posted on 03/13/2006 8:50:23 PM PST by Galveston Grl (Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

This boy is an example of how crazy parents can screw up their children, not an example of he's "born that way".

Crystal clear. They're clutching at straws.


63 posted on 03/14/2006 1:50:07 PM PST by little jeremiah (Tolerating evil IS evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
a spectrum of "gayness"

here's a Specter of gayness

64 posted on 03/15/2006 12:09:21 AM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: peyton randolph

LOL!


65 posted on 03/15/2006 10:24:30 AM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
I strongly suspect that the vast majority of sexual mis-orientation occurs because of issues between the person and one of his/her parents. I'm not a child psychologist, but experiences during the formative childhood years clearly have a strong influence on the rest of a person's life.

Have there been any studies to look at sexual mis-orientation vis a vis parental relationships (divorce, single-parent home, emotional, psychological, sexual or physical abuse, etc.)? That seems to me to be where the real action happens.

66 posted on 03/15/2006 10:31:55 AM PST by TChris ("Wake up, America. This is serious." - Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Did Dan Rather provide the data??


67 posted on 03/15/2006 10:33:54 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill
IMHO, I think that it's a combination of learned behavior and a chemical imbalance.

Sounds reasonable. Isn't is possible, however, that the chemical imbalance can have genetic causes?
68 posted on 03/15/2006 10:57:57 AM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

LOL


69 posted on 03/15/2006 11:39:00 AM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Isn't is possible, however, that the chemical imbalance can have genetic causes?

Such is termed a hypothesis -in the case of this subject article generally and in the case of a genetic cause specifically for the homosexual disorder - an unproven hypotheis...

70 posted on 03/15/2006 12:08:59 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
The elite media treat kids like Adam the same way the Sioux used to around the time of first-contact with Europeans. If a Sioux young boy chose to play with a doll, he was dressed in women's garb, sodomized by some of the men, and treated as a woman for the rest of his life.

Was this done because the young boy was genetically "gay"? No. It's simply a barbaric ritual that was later discarded. Just like scalping and cannibalism.

Our own barbaric culture has brought back sodomy and raised it to the level of a civil right. How long before they bring back scalping and cannibalism, too?
71 posted on 03/15/2006 12:15:43 PM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
A dog humping a leg tells all you need to know.. about sex..
Some are very confused, and don't really care what you think... its all about them..
72 posted on 03/15/2006 12:20:44 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butternut_squash_bisque
Jeeeeez, what were they thinking when they allowed him to do that crap?

The parents are obviously part of the problem. Then again, if they had done what most normal parents do and nipped this stuff in the bud at age 4, they wouldn't have had a reason to invite Leslie Stahl into their home for their 15 minutes of fame, would they?
73 posted on 03/15/2006 12:23:13 PM PST by Antoninus (The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

Can I ask a question here because I would be interested in hearing the membership's responses.

If it was proven fact down the line by the scientific community that homosexuality was hormonally induced, not genetically, nor a disorder of the mind - would the people here accept it as a physical anomaly - one which could not be affected or changed by the human, unless during the course of study, it is found that hormonal influence could be altered through application of medical treatment (even then not guaranteeing successful change)?

In other words if is a natural aberration in some to be born with a distinct hormonal impairment or one in which sexual identity does not equate with physical appearance..
could religious groups accept the scientific fact at some time in the future - or will homosexuals always be charged with "change" or "rejection"?


74 posted on 03/15/2006 12:23:50 PM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble
In other words if is a natural aberration in some to be born with a distinct hormonal impairment or one in which sexual identity does not equate with physical appearance.

The "issue" regarding the cause of the homosexual disorder is an issue pushed by homosexual agenda advocates primarily as a 'reason' or 'justification' for the completely separate issue of sexual activity one participates in which is always a choice.

In other words --REGARDLESS if it is proven that there is a natural aberration in some to be born with a distinct hormonal impairment or whatever that predisposes some to engage in an activity that society rejects -Society will still reject the activity...

75 posted on 03/15/2006 12:41:00 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Thank you for your kind response. Last time I tried to ask questions here I was punished by many lol.... I know I am too curious for my own good.


76 posted on 03/15/2006 1:31:28 PM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
Such is termed a hypothesis -in the case of this subject article generally and in the case of a genetic cause specifically for the homosexual disorder - an unproven hypothesis

Well, sure. I thought that was the whole point of doing these studies on siblings and twins - to see if there is a genetic component to the chemical imbalance you described. It's unproven, certainly. But that's why they are doing research like this...

Do you have another hypothesis on what may cause the chemical imbalance side of the equation? I've seen lots of theories on the behavorial aspect, but very few on the chemical side of things.

77 posted on 03/15/2006 1:32:57 PM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble
Last time I tried to ask questions here I was punished by many lol....

It's happened to me too. There are those here who believe that merely asking a question is equivalent to taking one side or the other. And that sucks - nobody should be given a hard time for asking an honest question, regardless of who believes what. Incidentally, the question you asked earlier has occured to me too - my theory is that it would probably would make little difference in people's attitudes - this is one subject that people have a difficult time changing their personal defaults about - in either direction.
78 posted on 03/15/2006 1:39:23 PM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain

Thanks - I don't mind the hazing - I learn best when I have a question and ask it regardless of the return of exchanges.

Everyone has an opinion....which is good....what is also good is there are those who constantly seek to pick away at topics rather than accept the general line of pacification...

There are many aspects of sexuality which have been hidden, or changed over the evolution of man.... thinking here of the primate upright walking and the replacement (displacement) and size change of the sexual organs in both male and female to new positions to accommodate the new body design.

If there is a homosexual element in our development I would hope there will be enough curious humans over the future decades to get at the truth.

Nature herself has homosexuality activity in many animals - and while humans are not animals, and we do have the gift of decision-making and choice - I think nature wins the war over choice in some instances - and perhaps homosexuality is one choice which hasn't much of a chance. I don't know.

I figure questions are worth asking of learned members here, and don't mean to inflame people just want opinions - opinion is one of the few personal attributes we get to keep and nurture these days - we must guard them - but we must also be willing to look at what we perceive to be the "dark side" too on occasion, either to re-validate our own beliefs, or to update them.


79 posted on 03/15/2006 3:45:38 PM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
Isn't is possible, however, that the chemical imbalance can have genetic causes?

Possible, but to me at least, not logical. Homosexuals, by definition, cannot reproduce, ergo a genetic predisposition cannot be passed along. Logically, the only way that it could be genetic is if it was an anomaly - the example that I used previously was 'Fragile-X'. Genetic anomalies are *very* rare in comparison to the incidence of homosexuality.

Unfortunately, my knowledge of both genetics and the endocrine system stops at High School anatomy.

Had an argument with a co-worker on this once...they thought that homosexuality was genetic and that societal pressures would influence gays to 'act straight'. Perhaps in today's society - but 30,000 years ago, did the same pressures exist? Possible, but I really don't think that it's likely.

Or, is homosexuality a relatively new (within the past 250 or so human generations) phenomenon?

Like I said before, the entire issue has become so politicized, that I doubt the answer will definitively be found, at least in my lifetime.

80 posted on 03/15/2006 6:01:01 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson