Skip to comments.
UK to buy Israeli 'James Bond' rifle
Ynet News (Israel) ^
| March 14, 2006
| Hagit Klaiman
Posted on 03/15/2006 3:52:24 AM PST by Hannah Senesh
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Hannah Senesh
The idea is good but can something with all that electronics stand up in the dirt and grime of warfare.
2
posted on
03/15/2006 4:10:41 AM PST
by
skimask
(Ezekiel: 25/17)
To: Hannah Senesh
So, is James Bond going to ask Israeli defense firm to pay for the patents of the corner shot thing? :P
3
posted on
03/15/2006 4:12:54 AM PST
by
Wiz
To: skimask
A similar weapon was developed and used in WW2 on the Eastern Front. I forget which side developed it, but I think it might have been the Germans who equipped some Schmeisser submachine guns with curved barrels.
To: Hannah Senesh
It's been done. WW2 German MP44 with curved barrel attachment:
5
posted on
03/15/2006 4:13:39 AM PST
by
Grut
To: lentulusgracchus
I think it might have been the Germans who equipped some Schmeisser submachine guns with curved barrels. I had a public edjumacated friend who insisted the idea was not developed furthter because the bullets kept going in a circle and hitting the shooter. :)
6
posted on
03/15/2006 4:17:21 AM PST
by
ko_kyi
To: Hannah Senesh
The recoil has got to be interesting.
7
posted on
03/15/2006 4:20:41 AM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
To: Grut
"It's been done. WW2 German MP44 with curved barrel attachment:"
That's very much like comparing a Ferrari with a chariot. Hey, they both have wheels.
To: Hannah Senesh
The British would do better to buy some testicle implants. They are the country that is scared shitless of pointy knives.
9
posted on
03/15/2006 4:27:14 AM PST
by
Modok
To: ko_kyi
I had a public edjumacated friend who insisted the idea was not developed furthter because the bullets kept going in a circle and hitting the shooter. :) That's funny. In reality though, IIRC the barrel wear was ridiculous and that's what led to the demise of the idea.
To: Hannah Senesh
And I always thought the Israelis were straight-shooters...
11
posted on
03/15/2006 4:36:37 AM PST
by
Hegemony Cricket
(Rage is the fuel that powers the islamic machine)
To: Modok
Nothing made me laugh more than the British study recommending that no one needs "pointy kitchen knives".
Sometimes I think that Monty Python has secretly taken control of Engeeerland...
12
posted on
03/15/2006 5:00:08 AM PST
by
Sender
(As water has no constant form, there are in war no constant conditions. Be without form. -Sun Tzu)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking the
keyword or
topic Israel.
---------------------------
13
posted on
03/15/2006 5:23:14 AM PST
by
SJackson
(There is but one language which can be held to these people, and this is terror, William Eaton)
To: ko_kyi
I think it might have been the Germans who equipped some Schmeisser submachine guns with curved barrels.
I had a public edjumacated friend who insisted the idea was not developed furthter because the bullets kept going in a circle and hitting the shooter. :) That wasn't publick screwel edjumacation, that was Loony Tunes! Everybody who has watched Bugs Bunny or Wile E. Coyote knows that bullets fired from a curved gun barrel will circle around and hit the shooter in the backside.
14
posted on
03/15/2006 5:50:33 AM PST
by
RebelBanker
(If you can't do something smart, do something right.)
To: Hannah Senesh
It uses a straight barrel. It has a Glock pistol out on the end of an articulated stock, with a video sight. Other versions appear to be grenade launchers.
A shooter can only imagine the challenge to manage recoil.
15
posted on
03/15/2006 6:04:31 AM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: Hegemony Cricket
Heh. Indeed.
This is a very roundabout and angled way of their opponents getting the point, so to speak.
Man, I crack myself up.
16
posted on
03/15/2006 6:17:32 AM PST
by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: Hannah Senesh
I remember pictures of a US sub-machine gun (M3 grease gun?) with 90 degree curved barrel.
17
posted on
03/15/2006 6:19:23 AM PST
by
CPOSharky
(They don't even like each other.)
To: CPOSharky
"I remember pictures of a US sub-machine gun (M3 grease gun?) with 90 degree curved barrel."
There ain't nothing new under the sun. It's the degree of innovation that counts. Take computers: I'm sure you'd agree that the latest Dell running Windows XP is a small improvement on the abacus.
To: Grut
Those Germans. Why didn't they take over the world, again?
19
posted on
03/15/2006 6:26:48 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Beelzebubba
It uses a straight barrel. It has a Glock pistol out on the end of an articulated stock, with a video sight. Other versions appear to be grenade launchers.A shooter can only imagine the challenge to manage recoil.
This seems to be very limited in practical use.
Handgun rounds have relatively limited stopping power, and followup shots are going to be very difficult due to managing the strange recoil and trying to reacquire the target on a video screen.
These guns are only going to work at relatively short ranges against unarmored opponents. Once the battle is engaged, and the soldiers need to move in, they are going to want a more formidable weapon that will drop their opponents better than a pistol.
If there opponents have decent powered rifles, they'll be able to shoot through the corners of wooden buildings and still have more stopping power than these pistols.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson