Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meeting Doctor Doom(Saving the Earth with Ebola)
The Citizen Scientist (via the Drudge Report) ^

Posted on 04/02/2006 9:57:25 AM PDT by Kokojmudd

Forrest M. Mims III

Copyright 2006 by Forrest M. Mims III.

Recently citizen scientist Forrest Mims told me about a speech he heard at the Texas Academy of Science during which the speaker, a world-renowned ecologist, advocated for the extermination of 90 percent of the human species in a most horrible and painful manner. Apparently at the speaker's direction, the speech was not video taped by the Academy and so Forrest's may be the only record of what was said. Forrest's account of what he witnessed chilled my soul. Astonishingly, Forrest reports that many of the Academy members present gave the speaker a standing ovation. To date, the Academy has not moved to sanction the speaker or distance itself from the speaker's remarks.

If the professional community has lost its sense of moral outrage when one if their own openly calls for the slow and painful extermination of over 5 billion human beings, then it falls upon the amateur community to be the conscience of science.

Forrest, who is a member of the Texas Academy and chairs its Environmental Science Section, told me he would be unable to describe the speech in The Citizen Scientist because he has protested the speech to the Academy and he serves as Editor of The Citizen Scientist . Therefore, to preclude a possible conflict of interest, I have directed Forrest to describe what he observed and his reactions in this special feature, for which I have served as editor and which is being released a week ahead of our normal publication schedule. Comments may be sent to Backscatter . Shawn Carlson, Ph.D., Founder and Executive Director, Society for Amateur Scientists.

There is always something special about science meetings. The 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science at Lamar University in Beaumont on 3-5 March 2006 was especially exciting for me, because a student and his professor presented the results of a DNA study I suggested to them last year. How fulfilling to see the baldcypress ( Taxodium distichum ) leaves we collected last summer and my tree ring photographs transformed into a first class scientific presentation that's nearly ready to submit to a scientific journal (Brian Iken and Dr. Deanna McCullough, "Bald Cypress of the Texas Hill Country: Taxonomically Unique?" 109th Meeting of the Texas Academy of Science Program and Abstracts [ PDF ], Poster P59, p. 84, 2006).

But there was a gravely disturbing side to that otherwise scientifically significant meeting, for I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola. The speech was given by Dr. Eric R. Pianka (Fig. 1), the University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert who the Academy named the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.

Something curious occurred a minute before Pianka began speaking. An official of the Academy approached a video camera operator at the front of the auditorium and engaged him in animated conversation. The camera operator did not look pleased as he pointed the lens of the big camera to the ceiling and slowly walked away.

This curious incident came to mind a few minutes later when Professor Pianka began his speech by explaining that the general public is not yet ready to hear what he was about to tell us. Because of many years of experience as a writer and editor, Pianka's strange introduction and the TV camera incident raised a red flag in my mind. Suddenly I forgot that I was a member of the Texas Academy of Science and chairman of its Environmental Science Section. Instead, I grabbed a notepad so I could take on the role of science reporter.

One of Pianka's earliest points was a condemnation of anthropocentrism, or the idea that humankind occupies a privileged position in the Universe. He told a story about how a neighbor asked him what good the lizards are that he studies. He answered, “What good are you?”

Pianka hammered his point home by exclaiming, “We're no better than bacteria!”

Pianka then began laying out his concerns about how human overpopulation is ruining the Earth. He presented a doomsday scenario in which he claimed that the sharp increase in human population since the beginning of the industrial age is devastating the planet. He warned that quick steps must be taken to restore the planet before it's too late.

Saving the Earth with Ebola

Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures . Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.

He then showed solutions for reducing the world's population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse . War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved.

Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets.

AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world's population is airborne Ebola ( Ebola Reston ), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. However, Professor Pianka did not mention that Ebola victims die a slow and torturous death as the virus initiates a cascade of biological calamities inside the victim that eventually liquefy the internal organs.

After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, “We've got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.”

With his slide of human skulls towering on the screen behind him, Professor Pianka was deadly serious. The audience that had been applauding some of his statements now sat silent.

After a dramatic pause, Pianka returned to politics and environmentalism. But he revisited his call for mass death when he reflected on the oil situation.

“And the fossil fuels are running out,” he said, “so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.” So the oil crisis alone may require eliminating two-third's of the world's population.

How soon must the mass dying begin if Earth is to be saved? Apparently fairly soon, for Pianka suggested he might be around when the killer disease goes to work. He was born in 1939, and his lengthy obituary appears on his web site .

When Pianka finished his remarks, the audience applauded. It wasn't merely a smattering of polite clapping that audiences diplomatically reserve for poor or boring speakers. It was a loud, vigorous and enthusiastic applause.

Questions for Dr. Doom

Then came the question and answer session, in which Professor Pianka stated that other diseases are also efficient killers.

The audience laughed when he said, “You know, the bird flu's good, too.” They laughed again when he proposed, with a discernable note of glee in his voice that, “We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.”

After noting that the audience did not represent the general population, a questioner asked, "What kind of reception have you received as you have presented these ideas to other audiences that are not representative of us?"

Pianka replied, "I speak to the converted!"

Pianka responded to more questions by condemning politicians in general and Al Gore by name, because they do not address the population problem and "...because they deceive the public in every way they can to stay in power."

He spoke glowingly of the police state in China that enforces their one-child policy. He said, "Smarter people have fewer kids." He said those who don't have a conscience about the Earth will inherit the Earth, "...because those who care make fewer babies and those that didn't care made more babies." He said we will evolve as uncaring people, and "I think IQs are falling for the same reason, too."

With this, the questioning was over. Immediately almost every scientist, professor and college student present stood to their feet and vigorously applauded the man who had enthusiastically endorsed the elimination of 90 percent of the human population. Some even cheered. Dozens then mobbed the professor at the lectern to extend greetings and ask questions. It was necessary to wait a while before I could get close enough to take some photographs (Fig. 1).

I was assigned to judge a paper in a grad student competition after the speech. On the way, three professors dismissed Pianka as a crank. While waiting to enter the competition room, a group of a dozen Lamar University students expressed outrage over the Pianka speech.

Yet five hours later, the distinguished leaders of the Texas Academy of Science presented Pianka with a plaque in recognition of his being named 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist. When the banquet hall filled with more than 400 people responded with enthusiastic applause, I walked out in protest.

Corresponding with Dr. Doom

Recently I exchanged a number of e-mails with Pianka. I pointed out to him that one might infer his death wish was really aimed at Africans, for Ebola is found only in Central Africa. He replied that Ebola does not discriminate, kills everyone and could spread to Europe and the the Americas by a single infected airplane passenger.

In his last e-mail, Pianka wrote that I completely fail to understand his arguments. So I did a check and found verification of my interpretation of his remarks on his own web site. In a student evaluation of a 2004 course he taught, one of Professor Pianka's students wrote, "Though I agree that convervation [sic] biology is of utmost importance to the world, I do not think that preaching that 90% of the human population should die of ebola [sic] is the most effective means of encouraging conservation awareness." (Go here and scroll down to just before the Fall 2005 evaluation section near the end.)

Yet the majority of his student reviews were favorable, with one even saying, “ I worship Dr. Pianka .”

The 45-minute lecture before the Texas Academy of Science converted a university biology senior into a Pianka disciple, who then published a blog that seriously supports Pianka's mass death wish.

Dangerous Times

Let me now remove my reporter's hat for a moment and tell you what I think. We live in dangerous times. The national security of many countries is at risk. Science has become tainted by highly publicized cases of misconduct and fraud.

Must now we worry that a Pianka-worshipping former student might someday become a professional biologist or physician with access to the most deadly strains of viruses and bacteria? I believe that airborne Ebola is unlikely to threaten the world outside of Central Africa. But scientists have regenerated the 1918 Spanish flu virus that killed 50 million people. There is concern that small pox might someday return. And what other terrible plagues are waiting out there in the natural world to cross the species barrier and to which scientists will one day have access?

Meanwhile, I still can't get out of my mind the pleasant spring day in Texas when a few hundred scientists of the Texas Academy of Science gave a standing ovation for a speaker who they heard advocate for the slow and tortuous death of over five billion human beings.

Forrest M. Mims III is Chairman of the Environmental Science Section of the Texas Academy of Science, and the editor of The Citizen Scientist. He and his science are featured online at and . The views expressed herein are his own and do not represent the official views of the Texas Academy of Science or the Society for Amateur Scientists.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: agenda21; anthropocentrism; citizenscientist; consensusscience; crevolist; drpianka; ebola; educatedfool; environazis; environmentalists; ericpianka; euthanasia; exterminatehumans; forrestmims; killeveryonenow; moonbat; nihilist; nihlist; omnicide; pianka; savethelizards; science; sicko; texasacademy; texasacademyscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-166 last
To: CarolinaGuitarman

It was the pain of lying abed that has kept from even turning ON the computer for 2 days!

151 posted on 04/04/2006 11:14:25 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Must be so; for some DO carry the same DNA stuff on their homepage

Apparently there has been some random selection via corrosive mutations on those home pages, the tributes are all gone for the most part. All it has produced is more evo talk/propaganda.

152 posted on 04/04/2006 6:39:23 PM PDT by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Reputation is critical for building support. Scientists, as a group, tend to think that LOGIC is the ruling and sole credible force, but there is much more to success than the ability to manipulate logic.

The scientific community's overall capabilities are declining drastically. Pick any field of science and it is clear that there are still only a few "greats", thousands of mediocres, and plenty of incompetents. The creation of fake science careers similar to "nutritional scientists" has done nothing to enhance the general public's trust in the accuracy and dependability of scientific research.

For example, ask any average 50 year old man or woman whether he should eat butter or margarine, and you will be subjected to a long lecture on "I don't believe any of that stuff; They don't know what they're talking about." He would also say the same thing about pollution, evolution, creation, weather, global temperature mapping, drugs and genetics.

You probably think it doesn't matter whether the general public has faith in scientists, but you're wrong. As the overall reputation of the community declines it will be harder to get grant money and endowments. More worrisome is the rate at which high school students are losing interest in careers in math or science.

Furthermore, when it really matters, like when a very large hurricane is really going to hit a very low lying city, public officials will not order evacuations, and citizens--who have learned not believe in the science of meteorology--WILL NOT EVACUATE.

When bird flu hits, many will opt not to get vaccinated, because they do not have faith in microbiology.

It has been an interesting experiment watching the so-called FR "scientists" following the social cues of their leader.

Actually, the entire thread has been no different than the original article about 500 scientists giving a standing ovation to an nutcase that wants to eliminate 90% of the human race to provide breeding grounds for his precious lizards.

Followers will be followers.

Sheep will be sheep.

It's just a shame to see "logical" thinkers not really thinking at all.

153 posted on 04/05/2006 6:27:05 PM PDT by demoRat watcher (Keeper of the Anthropocentrism Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
COPY what you want and PASTE it into a new e-mail. Press the SOURCE tab and then you can edit it to your delight!

Then again you could just choose ==>View ==>Source. Or in Opera you could just press CTRL F3.

154 posted on 04/05/2006 6:32:05 PM PDT by demoRat watcher (Keeper of the Anthropocentrism Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
perhaps the reason you got no response may be due to the fact...

that many scientists support massive global homicide. (Well, at least 500 in Texas do.)

155 posted on 04/05/2006 6:36:45 PM PDT by demoRat watcher (Keeper of the Anthropocentrism Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher

I'll reply later.

156 posted on 04/05/2006 6:45:48 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd
Click on the link:
Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

157 posted on 04/06/2006 12:54:53 AM PDT by StACase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StACase

We strongly recommend VHEMT to all liberals!

158 posted on 04/06/2006 4:05:02 AM PDT by demoRat watcher (Keeper of the Anthropocentrism Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher; grey_whiskers; PatrickHenry; Elsie; CarolinaGuitarman; Quark2005

Ecclesiastes 9:13-18

13This wisdom have I seen also under the sun, and it seemed great unto me:

14There was a little city, and few men within it; and there came a great king against it, and besieged it, and built great bulwarks against it:

15Now there was found in it a poor wise man, and he by his wisdom delivered the city; yet no man remembered that same poor man.

16Then said I, Wisdom is better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom is despised, and his words are not heard.

17The words of wise men are heard in quiet more than the cry of him that ruleth among fools.

18Wisdom is better than weapons of war: but one sinner destroyeth much good.

159 posted on 04/06/2006 6:01:25 PM PDT by mdmathis6 (Proof against evolution:"Man is the only creature that blushes, or needs to" M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher
Then again you could just choose ==>View ==>Source

Sometimes this doesn't work for me.

What we are discussing is done thus:

SELECT an area you wish to study/use with mouse LeftButton

Place cursor somewhere in this selected area

Press right mouse button to pull up menu

You may get lucky and find your cursor was such to give you VIEW SOURCE as an option: if so press it and there is your code.

If not, then you need to place your cursor somewhere else in the selected area and try again.

Loop until successful!

160 posted on 04/06/2006 8:35:21 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
'Why are we here?'

Because they are not all there.

161 posted on 04/08/2006 4:54:28 PM PDT by T'wit (Our top bioethicists: 5) Cranford 4) Rachel Carson 3) Ted Bundy 2) Margaret Sanger 1) Eric Pianka.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
I have one good thing to say about Eric Pianka: he changed my tagline. Of course I had to bump John Wayne Gacy to make room for him (really).

Bioethics pioneer John Wayne Gacy

162 posted on 04/08/2006 5:15:53 PM PDT by T'wit (Our top bioethicists: 5) Cranford 4) Rachel Carson 3) Ted Bundy 2) Margaret Sanger 1) Eric Pianka.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
What a perfectly chilling tale, T'wit! Thanks for the link!

"Top Five Bioethecists" is it? And you bumped Gacy to make room for Pianka? Seems a bit over the top! Jeepers, I wouldn't know who to put on such a list. There are so many qualified candidates it seems. For instance, your list doesn't mention Peter Singer....

Thanks so much for writing T'wit, and again for the link!

163 posted on 04/09/2006 10:38:43 AM PDT by betty boop (The world of Appearance is Reality’s cloak -- "Nature loves to hide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
>> Jeepers, I wouldn't know who to put on such a list.

Killers. But only very diligent, effective killers. If you're going to make the top five list spreading death, you have to be good at it. Bioethicists are death salesmen. They all say the same thing: "This is a great tragedy for the family. [Fill in the name] must die." On my list, Ted Bundy had the fewest postgraduate degrees but by far the most charm, and he killed more people than Dr. Death (Kevorkian), Dr. Humane Death (Cranford) and John Wayne Gacy put together.

Peter Singer is a wimp. I don't believe he's even strangled a baby yet.

164 posted on 04/10/2006 4:47:08 PM PDT by T'wit (Our top bioethicists: 5) Cranford 4) Rachel Carson 3) Ted Bundy 2) Margaret Sanger 1) Eric Pianka.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
My comments and tagline are sarcasm, of course. But the pro-death movement is only too real, and a good horselaugh is one of our better weapons for exposing its pretensions. "Bioethicists" indeed! Mostly they are academics with fancy titles who write bad books and give each other awards for being mean and narrow-minded and unholier-than-thou.

Meanwhile, thanks for remembering Betty Boop, a gal who made the whole country smile.

165 posted on 04/11/2006 4:19:42 AM PDT by T'wit (Our top bioethicists: 5) Cranford 4) Rachel Carson 3) Ted Bundy 2) Margaret Sanger 1) Eric Pianka.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
But the pro-death movement is only too real, and a good horselaugh is one of our better weapons for exposing its pretensions.

Bears repeating, T'wit! So very true. I'm beginning to think that the horselaugh may be the only effective remedy for these maniacs. I mean, you can't reason with them....

Thanks for writing, T'wit!

166 posted on 04/11/2006 6:17:51 AM PDT by betty boop (The world of Appearance is Reality’s cloak -- "Nature loves to hide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-166 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson