Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meeting Doctor Doom(Saving the Earth with Ebola)
The Citizen Scientist (via the Drudge Report) ^

Posted on 04/02/2006 9:57:25 AM PDT by Kokojmudd

Forrest M. Mims III

Copyright 2006 by Forrest M. Mims III.

Recently citizen scientist Forrest Mims told me about a speech he heard at the Texas Academy of Science during which the speaker, a world-renowned ecologist, advocated for the extermination of 90 percent of the human species in a most horrible and painful manner. Apparently at the speaker's direction, the speech was not video taped by the Academy and so Forrest's may be the only record of what was said. Forrest's account of what he witnessed chilled my soul. Astonishingly, Forrest reports that many of the Academy members present gave the speaker a standing ovation. To date, the Academy has not moved to sanction the speaker or distance itself from the speaker's remarks.

If the professional community has lost its sense of moral outrage when one if their own openly calls for the slow and painful extermination of over 5 billion human beings, then it falls upon the amateur community to be the conscience of science.

Forrest, who is a member of the Texas Academy and chairs its Environmental Science Section, told me he would be unable to describe the speech in The Citizen Scientist because he has protested the speech to the Academy and he serves as Editor of The Citizen Scientist . Therefore, to preclude a possible conflict of interest, I have directed Forrest to describe what he observed and his reactions in this special feature, for which I have served as editor and which is being released a week ahead of our normal publication schedule. Comments may be sent to Backscatter . Shawn Carlson, Ph.D., Founder and Executive Director, Society for Amateur Scientists.

There is always something special about science meetings. The 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science at Lamar University in Beaumont on 3-5 March 2006 was especially exciting for me, because a student and his professor presented the results of a DNA study I suggested to them last year. How fulfilling to see the baldcypress ( Taxodium distichum ) leaves we collected last summer and my tree ring photographs transformed into a first class scientific presentation that's nearly ready to submit to a scientific journal (Brian Iken and Dr. Deanna McCullough, "Bald Cypress of the Texas Hill Country: Taxonomically Unique?" 109th Meeting of the Texas Academy of Science Program and Abstracts [ PDF ], Poster P59, p. 84, 2006).

But there was a gravely disturbing side to that otherwise scientifically significant meeting, for I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola. The speech was given by Dr. Eric R. Pianka (Fig. 1), the University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert who the Academy named the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.

Something curious occurred a minute before Pianka began speaking. An official of the Academy approached a video camera operator at the front of the auditorium and engaged him in animated conversation. The camera operator did not look pleased as he pointed the lens of the big camera to the ceiling and slowly walked away.

This curious incident came to mind a few minutes later when Professor Pianka began his speech by explaining that the general public is not yet ready to hear what he was about to tell us. Because of many years of experience as a writer and editor, Pianka's strange introduction and the TV camera incident raised a red flag in my mind. Suddenly I forgot that I was a member of the Texas Academy of Science and chairman of its Environmental Science Section. Instead, I grabbed a notepad so I could take on the role of science reporter.

One of Pianka's earliest points was a condemnation of anthropocentrism, or the idea that humankind occupies a privileged position in the Universe. He told a story about how a neighbor asked him what good the lizards are that he studies. He answered, “What good are you?”

Pianka hammered his point home by exclaiming, “We're no better than bacteria!”

Pianka then began laying out his concerns about how human overpopulation is ruining the Earth. He presented a doomsday scenario in which he claimed that the sharp increase in human population since the beginning of the industrial age is devastating the planet. He warned that quick steps must be taken to restore the planet before it's too late.

Saving the Earth with Ebola

Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures . Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.

He then showed solutions for reducing the world's population in the form of a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse . War and famine would not do, he explained. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved.

Pianka then displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls, one of which had red lights flashing from its eye sockets.

AIDS is not an efficient killer, he explained, because it is too slow. His favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world's population is airborne Ebola ( Ebola Reston ), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. However, Professor Pianka did not mention that Ebola victims die a slow and torturous death as the virus initiates a cascade of biological calamities inside the victim that eventually liquefy the internal organs.

After praising the Ebola virus for its efficiency at killing, Pianka paused, leaned over the lectern, looked at us and carefully said, “We've got airborne 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that.”

With his slide of human skulls towering on the screen behind him, Professor Pianka was deadly serious. The audience that had been applauding some of his statements now sat silent.

After a dramatic pause, Pianka returned to politics and environmentalism. But he revisited his call for mass death when he reflected on the oil situation.

“And the fossil fuels are running out,” he said, “so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.” So the oil crisis alone may require eliminating two-third's of the world's population.

How soon must the mass dying begin if Earth is to be saved? Apparently fairly soon, for Pianka suggested he might be around when the killer disease goes to work. He was born in 1939, and his lengthy obituary appears on his web site .

When Pianka finished his remarks, the audience applauded. It wasn't merely a smattering of polite clapping that audiences diplomatically reserve for poor or boring speakers. It was a loud, vigorous and enthusiastic applause.

Questions for Dr. Doom

Then came the question and answer session, in which Professor Pianka stated that other diseases are also efficient killers.

The audience laughed when he said, “You know, the bird flu's good, too.” They laughed again when he proposed, with a discernable note of glee in his voice that, “We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.”

After noting that the audience did not represent the general population, a questioner asked, "What kind of reception have you received as you have presented these ideas to other audiences that are not representative of us?"

Pianka replied, "I speak to the converted!"

Pianka responded to more questions by condemning politicians in general and Al Gore by name, because they do not address the population problem and "...because they deceive the public in every way they can to stay in power."

He spoke glowingly of the police state in China that enforces their one-child policy. He said, "Smarter people have fewer kids." He said those who don't have a conscience about the Earth will inherit the Earth, "...because those who care make fewer babies and those that didn't care made more babies." He said we will evolve as uncaring people, and "I think IQs are falling for the same reason, too."

With this, the questioning was over. Immediately almost every scientist, professor and college student present stood to their feet and vigorously applauded the man who had enthusiastically endorsed the elimination of 90 percent of the human population. Some even cheered. Dozens then mobbed the professor at the lectern to extend greetings and ask questions. It was necessary to wait a while before I could get close enough to take some photographs (Fig. 1).

I was assigned to judge a paper in a grad student competition after the speech. On the way, three professors dismissed Pianka as a crank. While waiting to enter the competition room, a group of a dozen Lamar University students expressed outrage over the Pianka speech.

Yet five hours later, the distinguished leaders of the Texas Academy of Science presented Pianka with a plaque in recognition of his being named 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist. When the banquet hall filled with more than 400 people responded with enthusiastic applause, I walked out in protest.

Corresponding with Dr. Doom

Recently I exchanged a number of e-mails with Pianka. I pointed out to him that one might infer his death wish was really aimed at Africans, for Ebola is found only in Central Africa. He replied that Ebola does not discriminate, kills everyone and could spread to Europe and the the Americas by a single infected airplane passenger.

In his last e-mail, Pianka wrote that I completely fail to understand his arguments. So I did a check and found verification of my interpretation of his remarks on his own web site. In a student evaluation of a 2004 course he taught, one of Professor Pianka's students wrote, "Though I agree that convervation [sic] biology is of utmost importance to the world, I do not think that preaching that 90% of the human population should die of ebola [sic] is the most effective means of encouraging conservation awareness." (Go here and scroll down to just before the Fall 2005 evaluation section near the end.)

Yet the majority of his student reviews were favorable, with one even saying, “ I worship Dr. Pianka .”

The 45-minute lecture before the Texas Academy of Science converted a university biology senior into a Pianka disciple, who then published a blog that seriously supports Pianka's mass death wish.

Dangerous Times

Let me now remove my reporter's hat for a moment and tell you what I think. We live in dangerous times. The national security of many countries is at risk. Science has become tainted by highly publicized cases of misconduct and fraud.

Must now we worry that a Pianka-worshipping former student might someday become a professional biologist or physician with access to the most deadly strains of viruses and bacteria? I believe that airborne Ebola is unlikely to threaten the world outside of Central Africa. But scientists have regenerated the 1918 Spanish flu virus that killed 50 million people. There is concern that small pox might someday return. And what other terrible plagues are waiting out there in the natural world to cross the species barrier and to which scientists will one day have access?

Meanwhile, I still can't get out of my mind the pleasant spring day in Texas when a few hundred scientists of the Texas Academy of Science gave a standing ovation for a speaker who they heard advocate for the slow and tortuous death of over five billion human beings.

Forrest M. Mims III is Chairman of the Environmental Science Section of the Texas Academy of Science, and the editor of The Citizen Scientist. He and his science are featured online at and . The views expressed herein are his own and do not represent the official views of the Texas Academy of Science or the Society for Amateur Scientists.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: agenda21; anthropocentrism; citizenscientist; consensusscience; crevolist; drpianka; ebola; educatedfool; environazis; environmentalists; ericpianka; euthanasia; exterminatehumans; forrestmims; killeveryonenow; moonbat; nihilist; nihlist; omnicide; pianka; savethelizards; science; sicko; texasacademy; texasacademyscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-166 next last
To: demoRat watcher; Admin Moderator
It's one thing to copy the html code for my ping list logo, which you did in post 50. Anyone can do that. It's not very original of you, but it's no big deal. If you had asked for the code I would have given it to you. But you didn't ask, did you?

It's quite another thing, however, to hijack the names from my ping list for your own use, when you've had no previous contact with any of those people, or with me. At minimum, your conduct is exceedingly discourteous.

If this were my website I'd ban you on the spot. My hope is that the mods will -- at least -- strongly warn you not to repeat your behavior.

61 posted on 04/02/2006 3:32:54 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; Admin Moderator
I don't see any reason to ping the list for an obvious nutcase.

You're just annoyed that someone pre-empted your decision to not share this information with the evo- inner circle. FReerepublic is about open debate and spreading the inside story. Relax.

62 posted on 04/02/2006 3:38:40 PM PDT by demoRat watcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher; Admin Moderator
Your opinions about my motives are of no interest. Don't post to me. Don't ever post to me.
63 posted on 04/02/2006 3:43:10 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Oh, I think the news of this award-winning, well-respected biologist should be shared with those most interested in the latest developments in that beknighted field.

He might be nuts, but he's using his credentials to prop up his nuttiness. And it seems, as usual, when "practical" scientists embarass the profession, the profession deals with it by pretending it didn't happen.

Same Science, Different Day.

64 posted on 04/02/2006 3:51:39 PM PDT by AmishDude (Amishdude, servant of the dark lord Xenu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher
I never asked to be on this *list*. As it isn't April 1st, there is no excuse. Please desist from pining me again.

BTW, I never said I was a scientist.
65 posted on 04/02/2006 3:58:03 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("Things are not what they always seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Don't know how you all will feel about this one - could spark some interesting conversation (your discretion).

I don't see any reason to ping the list for an obvious nutcase.

You don't think nutjobs (or worse, depending on how serious he is) like this don't give science a bad name?

66 posted on 04/02/2006 4:06:54 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher

This article proves one thing: Scientists are not Gods and some of them are actually insane.

67 posted on 04/02/2006 4:09:32 PM PDT by demoRat watcher (Beware of "Scientists" that shout down the voice of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

That should have been *pinging* me, not *pining*.

68 posted on 04/02/2006 4:11:34 PM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("Things are not what they always seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Here's the problem, King Prout:

...almost every scientist, professor and college student present stood to their feet and vigorously applauded the man who had enthusiastically endorsed the elimination of 90 percent of the human population

Either this does not bode well for the next generation of science or the entire room was filled with "nutjobs".

Surprisingly, none of the staunchest advocates of the scientific community of FR seem to think this is a problem.

69 posted on 04/02/2006 4:14:52 PM PDT by demoRat watcher (Beware of "Scientists" that shout down the voice of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd
Pianka replied, "I speak to as the converted retarded!"


70 posted on 04/02/2006 4:16:47 PM PDT by humblegunner (If you're gonna die, die with your boots on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman
That should have been *pinging* me, not *pining*.

No fjords in your past, eh?

71 posted on 04/02/2006 4:16:52 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Zoology isn't a hard science. :P

72 posted on 04/02/2006 4:16:56 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd
Paging Dr. Jones ... Paging Dr. Jones ...

73 posted on 04/02/2006 4:18:46 PM PDT by sono ("If Congressional brains were cargo, there'd be nothing to unload." - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
By defeating a virus, the survivor has the genetic code to fight it. Sometimes a virus can go dormant and hide (HIV). The virus doesn't always die within the survivor's body. It may stay with him/her for life. It doesn't necessarily mean that the virus can be transmitted either.

Ebola survivors have donated blood to new victims with some measure of success (from what I've heard).

Hoping for an Ebola scurge is not very likely. Bacterial infection is the more likely WMD agent, and plagues generally hurt poorer nations.

Ironically, the diabolic mindset to rid the world of the human race is usually a mind that hates industrialized nations and is enamored with "simple" 3rd world cultures.

From this present uncharitable horror show, I wouldn't be suprised if this results oriented malicious-minded "doctor" ultimately targets homosexuals instead of industrialists captialists just to have some measure of success. After all, who was the Nazi that stated, "At least we killed 6 million Jews"? Might the diabolic "doctor" say in similar fashion, "at least we killed the homo's."

The crowd that enjoys sexual perversion as a entertainment or a lifestyle should be especially leary of Ebola murderers. Condoms aren't armor enough and neither are latex underwear. Death by any virus is horrifically painful. I doubt bacterial infection is any cozier.

Toning down the virus to stretch its incubation period while making it more survivable in harsher environments will effect those most likely to catch a virus in the first place.

Homosexual activists catching the virus puts society at greater risk considering the past behavior of their most extreme elements. Spreading disease has been on Act-Up's agenda as part of their pursuit of power plan.

Note to the left of center crowd: killing off homosexuals will not make the Democratic party appear more moderate. Everyone, not just unborn children, has a right to life (including sinners struggling with lust and same sex attraction). Using or appealing to the worst of human haters to rid your party's sexually perverted elements will not help you politically nor will it ensure a stable future.

Historical example:

Ernst Röhm

Memorable History is not that old.
74 posted on 04/02/2006 4:19:32 PM PDT by SaltyJoe (A mother's sorrowful heart and personal sacrifice redeems her lost child's soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd
, a world-renowned ecologist, advocated for the extermination of 90 percent of the human species

Wasn't this the theme of a Thomas Crichton novel?

75 posted on 04/02/2006 4:22:28 PM PDT by Pelham (Treason: Not just for Democrats anymore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher

Please remove me from this ping list. I don't know what "Humanicentrism" is, other than a late april fools joke. A sick one at that.

76 posted on 04/02/2006 4:22:43 PM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher
//This article proves one thing: Scientists are not Gods and some of them are actually insane//

It certainly does. Then there are the scientific 'poseurs' that actually think they own html code etc. On a less consequential level thats insane /sarc>

Also the same people that order you never to ping them with sanctiomious indignation will simultaneously have no issue about having a sidebar about you all for your 'entertainment'

77 posted on 04/02/2006 4:24:03 PM PDT by RunningWolf (Vet US Army Air Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher

That's because not everyone who goes to work and does science for a living is a kooky misanthropic zoologist.

I really doubt, for example, that there were many chemists, physicists, engineers, or even the majority of the University of Texas's biology department present.

Nutty people showed up to listen to a nut. They likely knew what they would hear. Like the man said, he was preching to the choir.

78 posted on 04/02/2006 4:28:28 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig; Aetius; Alamo-Girl; AndrewC; Asphalt; Aussie Dasher; Baraonda; ...
"'Why are we here?' That question is answered in evolution. Everyone should be required to take this class to 'spread the word.'"

That is a perfect summation of what promoting the death-culture of evolution has done to this country.

79 posted on 04/02/2006 4:28:35 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: furball4paws; CarolinaGuitarman; narby

Sure, no problem!

Just so you know, it will be called the "Anthropocentrism Ping List", in future (in case you change your mind and want to be kept abreast of this dangerous movement that is rocking the scientific world).

80 posted on 04/02/2006 4:32:17 PM PDT by demoRat watcher (Keeper of the Anthropocentrism Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson