Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pickrell

Well, you do have to admit that Fox is far from "fair and balanced". The only real difference is that they're more obvious in their bias....


6 posted on 04/28/2006 8:32:14 AM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eraser2005
"...Well, you do have to admit that Fox is far from "fair and balanced". The only real difference is that they're more obvious in their bias...."

Oh, I'll grant you that certain segments and certain pundits on Fox have a conservative lean. But that misses the point.

If the media truly/b> was non biased and objective, then then they would necessarily need to watch BOTH channels.

If the media was not non-biased, but rather split down the middle like America, then half of them would demand CNN, and half demand Fox.

What do you call it when the non-biased newsmen ALL demand CNN?

Now, I don't know about you... but when it looks like a Helen Thomas, and it smells like a Helen Thomas, and it sounds like a Helen Thomas...

..someone or "somethem" seem to be hoist on their own canard...

All kidding aside, thanks for the reply.

13 posted on 04/28/2006 11:34:53 AM PDT by pickrell (Old dog, new trick...sort of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: eraser2005
The only real difference is that they're more obvious in their bias

I would say that Fox is less obvious with it's leftwing bias. It still has a ways to go to the right before it would be balanced though.
15 posted on 04/28/2006 12:50:38 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson