Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report to FR on Freeper Candidate for Congress, NC 11th District
Special to FreeRepublic ^ | 3 May 2006 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)

Posted on 05/02/2006 9:34:31 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob

This is the Fifth and Final - for now - Report on the Campaign for the 11th District in NC. The eight-term Congressman, Charles Taylor, has defeated me for the nomination of the Republican Party. However, Mr. Taylor's career as a Member of Congress is now over.

That paradoxical conclusion is not a matter of my opinion. It is based on observations of lifelong residents in western Carolina who've been active in politics most of their adult lives. Consider the parameters of this race:

Charles Taylor is a long term incumbent who worked his way up the ladder to a position on the Appropriations Committee of the House. His newsletters back to the District for years have featured the amounts of money garnered for various entities and local governments. Mr. Taylor had the apparent support of every Republican elected official in western Carolina. And he had effectively unlimited funds, in light of the fact that he loaned his own campaign slightly less than $990,000 in the last election cycle to have sufficient funds to win. All that loaned money has since been repaid to Mr. Taylor from on-going fundraising, so he is in a position to do the same thing in this election year.

In addition, Mr., Taylor had both a professional staff as a Member of Congress, and a volunteer staff of outsiders, to assist him in campaigning as he approached the primary. According to his Federal Election Commission filings, Mr. Taylor spent $255,000 before the primary election.

By contrast, I had no professional staff, and a very limited volunteer staff. I have never held any public elective office. My FEC filings show I spent less than $24,000, prior to this election.

You can understand why knowledgeable political observers told me I'd be fortunate to break 10% of the total vote in the Republican primary. One observer stated that if I "did take 20%, Taylor would be finished as a viable candidate for re-election." The total vote in the Republican primary was 32,845 as of 12:16 a.m., Wednesday. I received 19.8% of that vote. The results have been fairly consistent among the 15 counties in the District, and over time since first votes were reported at 8:08 pm yesterday. So, this result should hold up as the remaining votes in the District are reported.

In a split District where a winning Republican has to hold his base, more than break even among independents, and draw a few votes from conservative Democrats, Taylor's 20% leakage against me in the primary tells the local experts that Taylor cannot win the general election this year.

The first independent poll of the 11th District, probably by the Asheville Citizen-Times, will measure the race between Mr. Taylor and Heath Shuler, a one-time football player and first time candidate for public office, who won the Democrat primary today. If that poll, six months before the election, shows Shuler significantly ahead, then the conclusions of the experts who talked to me will be confirmed.

The bottom line has turned out as I described in my Fifth Report on the Campaign, before the primary. Either Congressman Taylor will conclude that he cannot win the general election this year and withdraw -- as Congressman DeLay did in Texas this year. Or, the leaders of the Republican Party, both locally and nationally, will compel Taylor to withdraw -- as Senator Torricelli was forced to do in New Jersey in 2006. This is NOT a year in which the Republicans can afford to throw away a seat in Congress because their current nominee cannot recognize defeat staring him in the face.

So, my campaign will not end at this point. It will go into semi-hibernation until such time as the Republican nomination in this District needs to be filled by the decision of the 11th District Republican Committee.

I hope that all of you are gratified by the results obtained so far, on the resources and skills available. I hope you will support me in the quiet effort to be prepared, in case there's a change in the Republican nomination. And I hope you will support me again, should I be the new Republican nominee.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this primary, and possibilities beyond that.

John


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: appropriations; bitter; charlestaylor; congressmanbillybob; eighttermincumbent; johnarmor; republicanparty; soreloser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last
Many Freepers helped and encouraged me in this run for Congress, which is not yet over. For those who thought I shouldn't run, or hoped I would fail, skip this Report because it won't be to your liking. The majority of my friends and colleagues here deserve this Report, so here it is.

John / Billybob

1 posted on 05/02/2006 9:34:34 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob; fieldmarshaldj; southernnorthcarolina; John Geyer; GeorgefromGeorgia; ...

I wish you well in future endeavors.

I think you're right about Charlie Taylor being finished. My hope is that he drops out of the race. If he does that, how would the GOP nominee be chosen?


2 posted on 05/02/2006 9:39:46 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Congrats to you for having the fortitude to run against one of the Hill Appropriators (read: pork addicts). And best of luck in the future.

Cheers.


3 posted on 05/02/2006 9:40:00 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Why not accept your defeat gracefully and endorse the winner?


4 posted on 05/02/2006 9:40:23 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Keep going of course! You can move here and I will gladly vote for you! :-)


5 posted on 05/02/2006 9:41:35 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
As my article says, if Taylor drops out, the new nominee will be chosen by the 11th District Republican Committee. They can choose anyone, but I would be back in the running.

John / Billybob
6 posted on 05/02/2006 9:42:44 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

"I received 19.8% of that vote."

Against an intrenched incumbent, that's great.

Congratulations my friend. We need more Americans like you. Try again.

no dems


7 posted on 05/02/2006 9:44:20 PM PDT by no dems (A Winning Campaign Theme for a Conservative in '08: "PUTTING AMERICA FIRST")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
I gather you have not followed this race very closely. Days after I officially announced my intention to run, Rep. Taylor's Press Secretary sent out an e-mail from her government account which accused me of being "a left-wing radical," a "nut," and a man of "little or no morals." Also at the same time, another Taylor functionary attacked me and my family, personally.

So, the first question is, would Rep. Taylor even want the support of someone as nasty as his people described me. We'll see what he says down the road.

You also miss the point that political parties are not obligated to run candidates who will obviously lose the party seats it currently holds in the House or Senate. My article gives two examples of exactly that sort of reaction, one in the Senate, the other in the House.

I trust these additional facts answer your question.

John / Billybob
8 posted on 05/02/2006 9:48:49 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I see. Well you failed to get 80% of the primary votes so I am wondering why you feel your 20% would translate to victory in the general election. Then again, Free Republic is not making much sense lately so I guess hope springs eternal.


9 posted on 05/02/2006 9:52:51 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Just remember this, my friend:

No matter what happens in the future, you can always hold yourself in the knowledge that when others pointed fingers, complained, whined and criticized, YOU DID SOMETHING.

You are a man of ACTION, and win or lose, that sets you apart from the herd. Respect is worth a lot more than love, and my respect you have.

10 posted on 05/02/2006 10:08:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (After hearing that crazy bitch on Hannity, I want the borders closed NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
If you compare my background to that of Charles Taylor and Heath Shuler, you will understand my position. You might want to look at Senator Torricelli (2004) and Rep. DeLay (2006) to understand the quandary the Republicans are now in, concerning this race.

Facts are useful in understanding any situation.

John / Billybob
11 posted on 05/02/2006 10:10:28 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
If you compare my background to that of Charles Taylor and Heath Shuler, you will understand my position. You might want to look at Senator Torricelli (2004) and Rep. DeLay (2006) to understand the quandary the Republicans are now in, concerning this race.

You may be right but I am still wondering how you would parlay 20% into 51% in November. You are also close to accusing Tom Delay of being guilty of corruption which is over the line in my opinion.

12 posted on 05/02/2006 10:13:21 PM PDT by Texasforever (I have neither been there nor done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Well done John! A win, of course, would have been the preferred outcome, but against an incumbent who has held office for years and won multiple elections you made significant inroads and positioned yourself well for the future. As you say, the future may come sooner than later. Congratulations, my hat is off to you.


13 posted on 05/02/2006 10:33:46 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I thought you would get 10% of the vote. You got 20% of the vote. That causes me to downrate Taylor's chances in the General, because I don't think you were a known candidate at all. I think your vote was I don't like Taylor, so I will vote for the other guy vote. I rank pending further scandal developments, the district to be a near tossup in the General. Assuming Taylor's position further deteriorates, and he does withdraw, which I tend to doubt, but it is certainly a possibility (and this win the primary thing, and then withdraw, and let the party bosses pick the nominee, is now becoming very fashionable), what the the odds that you think the GOP will pick you as the replacement?

You are of course free to not answer the above question, or deflect it, but I thought I should ask, so that you have something on the record, as a response, or non response.

14 posted on 05/02/2006 10:35:19 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Hey Dude, my name is Griffin. I'm the son of Bert Griffin the councilman who incorporated Fletcher, NC 28732. That incorporation paperwork was done at the desk I am typing this posting. I know Fletcher and we can't stand democrats because we all understand they are a bunch of extremist nut cases. Fletcher will come through and put Taylor over the top in the election. They don't spend much effort on the primaries but in the November elections we stand in line till 11:30 PM to vote because there are over 600 in line at poll closing time of 7:30 PM. We are absolutely dedicated to crushing Democrats and the main Republican holdout in Western North Carolina.
15 posted on 05/02/2006 10:59:55 PM PDT by MedicalMess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Sorry, Billybob, but 20% leakage is nothing for an incumbent in a primary. Anyone can get 20 percent, just look at the no-namers who run against other House incumbents.

If you'd gotten 35 percent or more, then I'd be interested. Taylor's got a tough race ahead, but I don't think your showing is particularly discouraging for him.


16 posted on 05/02/2006 10:59:55 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Well you failed to get 80% of the primary votes so I am wondering why you feel your 20% would translate to victory in the general election. Then again, Free Republic is not making much sense lately so I guess hope springs eternal.

Let me see if I understand this reasoning.

A guy who gets 80% of the GOP primary vote is going to be asked to step down so a guy who got 20% of the GOP Primary vote can take his place. And this 20% guy is supposed to beat the Democrat who won his primary?

What am I missing?

17 posted on 05/02/2006 11:05:04 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Nifong moves into the district.


18 posted on 05/02/2006 11:07:00 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

I wish you well in your future endeavors.
Although I was not in your district, and soon will leave this state entirely, I hope you will continue in your efforts to return elected officials to their primary duty, which is representational government, elected by and for individuals, not industries, groups, or various unions.
I highly value your thoughtful opinions and comments on issues that affect us all, as individuals.
I did so before I moved to NC, and will continue to do so when I am "back home".
For what it's worth, IMHO, we all desperately need people like you to continue to seek public office.
Please don't stop trying!



19 posted on 05/02/2006 11:10:20 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Pay no attention to the scoffers, John. You took twenty percent away from him, an incumbent, with a fraction of the money he had available. He very well could drop out, or be 'asked' to. If the Republican party at the state and national level has a shred political acumen left, they would take a long look at this race.


20 posted on 05/02/2006 11:37:28 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Good job!


21 posted on 05/02/2006 11:39:51 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Mr. Taylor's career as a Member of Congress is now over.

LOL. You're kidding, right? You don't have the grace to hang it up and endorse him, or at least go away quietly? You sound like Al Gore. Taylor's not going anywhere.

That paradoxical conclusion is not a matter of my opinion.

"Paradoxical conclusion?" Sounds a bit more like a delusional conclusion to me.

I spent less than $24,000

That's only one of the reasons why you got your @$$ kicked. The other primary reasons are 1) you didn't do any serious campaigning, you know, like knocking on virtually every door in your district, the kind of thing that most candidates with minimal funding routinely do, and 2) you're unelectable unless you live in Ron Paul's district and he retires, and even that's doubtful.

knowledgeable political observers told me I'd be fortunate to break 10%

Any "knowledgeable political observer" would have told you that anyone with a pulse will get around 20% of the primary vote from the perpetual-malcontent segment against any long-time incumbent. I'd guess that at least 95% of the people who voted for you don't have the slightest idea who you are or what you stand for, they just know that you're not Taylor.

So, my campaign will not end at this point.

Why? Ego? Face it. It's over. There's always 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020. Name recognition will set in at some point.

It will go into semi-hibernation

When wasn't it hibernating? Sitting at a keyboard plinking out posts on the internet doesn't count as serious campaigning.

I hope you will support me again, should I be the new Republican nominee.

Put down the bong and get real. Write an amicus brief or two. You'll probably feel better.

But, congratulations on losing your poorly-run joke of a vanity race and giving Shuler a better chance of winning by bad-mouthing Taylor when you had no chance of winning! Way to go!

22 posted on 05/03/2006 3:31:24 AM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier; Congressman Billybob
Sorry, Billybob, but 20% leakage is nothing for an incumbent in a primary. Anyone can get 20 percent, just look at the no-namers who run against other House incumbents. If you'd gotten 35 percent or more, then I'd be interested. Taylor's got a tough race ahead, but I don't think your showing is particularly discouraging for him

It's something when the DEM candidate is Heath Shuler. This is not by any means an unknown on the DEM side if it's the Heath Shuler I'm thinking of. Shuler will win it pretty easy. He is pretty well liked in his home state and the one directly east as well where he played college football :>} Shuler can win this race on popularity alone.

This one isn't gonna be about party it's going to be about the name. You can bet on it. It's hard to defeat an icon. He's also has a real estate agency with his name on it. Who knows he may be a lot more conservative than the RINO. I don't know enough about the race to know his platform to say one way or the other.

23 posted on 05/03/2006 3:34:15 AM PDT by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Well, I guess like Alan Keyes you ran for the election.


24 posted on 05/03/2006 3:36:27 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Good luck on your future endeavors.


25 posted on 05/03/2006 3:42:41 AM PDT by Focault's Pendulum (I'm not a curmudgeon!!!! I've just been in a bad mood since '73)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day; TaxRelief; 100%FEDUP; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; ~Vor~; A2J; a4drvr; Adder; ...

NC *Ping*

Please FRmail Constitution Day OR TaxRelief OR Alia if you want to be added to or removed from this North Carolina ping list.
26 posted on 05/03/2006 4:27:01 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
Ah, you did not read the article with care. The race to replace Charles Taylor is now on. If I'm chosen to replace Taylor, I should defeat Shuler handily. As I say in my speeches, "When Heath Shuler was just out of diapers, I was winning my first case in the Supreme Court."

Shuler's campaign manager told me to my face that I would be a tougher opponent than Taylor -- because of Taylor's massive ethical and legal problems. And that analysis is correct.

I didn't enter this race to make a point. I entered it to gain election to Congress. That possibility remains very much alive, exactly as I stated above.

John / Billybob
27 posted on 05/03/2006 4:29:01 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
$24K for name recognition, the opportunity to introduce your thoughts to others?

You did very well, Congressman Billybob. Congratulations.

28 posted on 05/03/2006 4:40:26 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; Congressman Billybob; fieldmarshaldj; southernnorthcarolina; John Geyer
I am not familiar with Congressman Taylor. Why is he likely to loose? Is this district predominately GOP?

We can only hope that Heath Schuler is a poor a politician as he was a Redskins QB.
29 posted on 05/03/2006 4:41:47 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
No, I didn't accuse Tom DeLay of corruption. I followed the Torricelli situation in New Jersey closely. I think Torricelli was guilty as sin. I followed the DeLay situation in New Jersey. I think DeLay is a victim of trumped up charges which will eventually be dismissed.

However, the critical question about every candidate going into any election, is this: Can this candidate in these particular circumstances, win this election? DeLay answered that question about the general election as "no," and stepped aside for the good of his party.

Torricelli, being self-absorbed, had to be pushed very hard to get him out of there. The same may apply here in the 11th District.

Now, as to the dynamics of this race going forward, Shuler has been riding on the correct perception that he is more honest than Taylor, and a fresh face. Against me, both of those advantages disappear, and it becomes mano a mano.

I have more than 33 years experience working in and for local, state and federal government. Shuler has zero experience in any of those governments. I won't go into detail about my campaign plan against Shuler. It doesn't apply yet. But when it does, I expect to be the odds-on favorite to win.

All political races are situational. No one runs in the abstract. We all run against specific opponents in specific circumstances.

John / Billybob
30 posted on 05/03/2006 4:44:19 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Torie
You should not assume that I would duck the answer to a question, especially when I have freely answered it in the past.

There are two Republican state senators, one man and one woman, who would dearly love to have Charles Taylor's seat in Congress. I've met both. Neither dared run against Taylor, but both will be in the hunt to replace Taylor, if that opportunity arises.

The Taylor people will probably seek to deny the new nomination to me. But I have the strongest background to run against Shuler, the Democrat. I've already been in touch -- going back a couple years -- with key members of the nomination Committee.

Bottom line: I rate my chances of being the new nominee as good, but less than 50-50. If I do get the new nomination, I rate my chances of election at better than 50-50. What I have just described is my Plan B. And, like any former engineer, I had a Plan B in my pocket since day one.

John / Armor
31 posted on 05/03/2006 4:53:25 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AntiScumbag
Congratulations on ... giving Shuler a better chance of winning by bad-mouthing Taylor when you had no chance of winning!

In theory I agree with you, but this is ALWAYS true with primaries. Primaries always provide insight for the other side in the general election.

It is always a two way street. Both party primaries provide insight for the side. Look at the Dem results:

Heath Shuler DEM 29,185
Michael Morgan DEM 9,915

Morgan received 25% of the votes in the Dem primary. Did Morgan not provide ammunition for Taylor to use against Shuler in the general election?

Blaming Armor for exposing Taylor's weak points hinges on the assumption that Shuler would have been too stupid to discover the issues himself. We may not like him, but we can all agree that Shuler is not stupid.

32 posted on 05/03/2006 4:57:27 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You are missing most of the facts about the candidates in this race. If you are truly interested in the fate of the 11th District, and whether that seat will be held for conservative Republican positions, you need to do your homework.

The first step has to be, Is Charles Taylor fatally damaged in his bid for reelection? (In the rare instances when incumbents lose, the fatal political injuries are almost always self-inflicted.)

Once you know why Taylor is fatally flawed at this point, then you will easily understand why a "content-free" candidate like Heath Shuler is favored to take the seat. And, once you understand that, you will easily see why several scandal-free Republicans, including me, can defeat Shuler, where Taylor could not.

Every step is logical. But you have to have a grip on the relevant facts.

John / Billybob
33 posted on 05/03/2006 5:00:03 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AntiScumbag
You are wrong on so many points it's hard to know where to begin. Let's just take one point. I never "bad-mouthed Taylor." I wrote and published exactly one article that pointed out five different million-dollar and up errors in hie Reports filed with the Ethics Committee.

Taylor signed those Reports under penalties of perjury, and I quoted them accurately. No one in Taylor's camp has suggested that a single fact, name, date or number I cited was the slightest bit inaccurate.

As for the rest of your allegations, time and circumstance will answer them. Observe and learn.

And you seem to think that I was stating my own conclusions. As stated, I was stating the conclusions of political veterans, both Republicans and Democrats, who have spent their lives in politics in western Carolina. Your knowledge of the politics of this area is derived how?....

John / Billybob
34 posted on 05/03/2006 5:09:53 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
Congratulations on ... giving Shuler a better chance of winning by bad-mouthing Taylor when you had no chance of winning!

I guess you missed my point, because you left it out of your quotation. Here it is again:

But, congratulations on losing your poorly-run joke of a vanity race and giving Shuler a better chance of winning by bad-mouthing Taylor when you had no chance of winning! Way to go!

Now the sore loser pulls out plan B. I can't wait for plans C, D and E.

35 posted on 05/03/2006 5:13:31 AM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AntiScumbag
you left it out of your quotation.

I never quote personal attacks.

But back to the substance of the omitted portion, in what way was Armor's campaign poorly run?

What would you have done differently?

36 posted on 05/03/2006 5:23:16 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

There's a Taylor/Abramoff connection that certain parties think will cause him to have to drop out of this election.


37 posted on 05/03/2006 5:25:22 AM PDT by Rebelbase ("truth is not invalidated by suppression"--nicmarlo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
No, I read it. I'll give you an A for faith and an F for reality.

But then again who knows. I'll make you a wager. If I'm correct, then next time I'm through Ashville, you can buy me a cup of coffee at one of the Java houses in the university district. If I'm wrong, I'll do the same for you. Deal?

38 posted on 05/03/2006 6:03:36 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief; AntiScumbag; Torie

Michael Morgan was total moonbat leftist whose main issues were legalization of (a) drugs; (b) blackjack; and (c) illegals. I doubt the votes he got mean anything much beyond name recognition (Shuler's is still not that great), and there's certainly no doubt that anyone who voted for Morgan on his issues will not be voting for Taylor, but is probably an ironclad Shuler vote (anti-Taylor vote) in the general election.


39 posted on 05/03/2006 6:26:00 AM PDT by AntiGuv ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Do you think the Armor voters will vote for Shuler?


40 posted on 05/03/2006 6:31:24 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Wal-Mart: Keeping my family on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
I never "bad-mouthed Taylor." I wrote and published exactly one article that pointed out five different million-dollar and up errors in hie Reports filed with the Ethics Committee.

Never? One article? Really? Care to explain this:

To: rocksblues

Mollohan is as crooked as a dog's hind leg, as they say hereabouts.
[snip]
Meantime, the man I'm running against, Charles Taylor from NC, has done all the things that Mollohan has done, just not in numbers quite as large. Millions, but not as many millions.
[snip]
19 posted on 04/21/2006 11:50:47 PM EDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Or, how about this:

Interview With John Armor, Republican Candidate in NC-11

Charles Taylor, Armor emphasized, has a long history of ethical problems that could become criminal problems.
[snip]
Armor asserted that "Assuming he [Taylor] survives an ethics investigation, and there are multiple 5 million dollar gaps in what he filed [with the FEC]," Taylor's fiscal inconsistencies could lead to "criminal prosecutions".

I can post more if you wish. Nah, you didn't bad-mouth him at all. Only just about everytime you opened your mouth on the internet or in an interview.

Taylor signed those Reports under penalties of perjury, and I quoted them accurately. No one in Taylor's camp has suggested that a single fact, name, date or number I cited was the slightest bit inaccurate.

Why would Taylor bother responding to a bug they don't consider worth squashing? If you had made a splash with 5 or 10 good ideas for the district that got some publicity, they might have responded to what you had to say.

As for the rest of your allegations, time and circumstance will answer them. Observe and learn.

I have "observed and learned." I notice that you don't deny that "circumstances," namely your routine and resounding defeat, have already demonstrated that conducting an "internet" vanity campaign doesn't amount to squat. Great for the ego, maybe gets you some play on message boards, but other than that, well, what can I say.

And you seem to think that I was stating my own conclusions.

No, I pointed out that the "paradoxical conclusion" seemed to be delusional.

Your knowledge of the politics of this area is derived how?

Why would whether or not I have any knowledge whatsoever of your area matter? I'm not commenting on the "politics of" your "area," I'm commenting on you and your actions, or lack thereof. Voters everywhere seem to detect BS equally well, and the voters of your area have spoken. Loudly.

So, let me congratulate you on your stunning loss again. Fortunately, it's highly likely that you and your "campaign" will soon be forgotten by the voters, and hopefully it hasn't contributed to a loss of a Republican House seat.

41 posted on 05/03/2006 6:36:17 AM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Well, voter turnout was extraordinarily low for this primary election. That says to me that people didn't much care, and knew that Taylor would win the primary.

Since Taylor accumulated 80% of the vote in the GOP primary, it would take some major catastrophe for the GOP to substitute another candidate for the general election.

I note that the loser of the DEM primary recieved more votes than you did on the GOP side, as well.

If you wish the district to be represented in Washington by a Republican, I advise you to endorse Taylor as soon as possible. If you do not, and you continue to malign him on the internet, there will be a DEM from your district in Washington after the general election.

Does Taylor have skeletons in his closet? I wouldn't be surprised. Most congresscritters do. Will the Abramoff thing sink him? I doubt it very much.

But, it's your decision, of course. You can continue to malign Taylor and get a DEM as a congressman or you can do the right thing and simply endorse him or say nothing.

It's up to you Billybob. This 2006 election is going to be a critical one. You can either help to maintain a GOP majority or you can help to establish a DEM majority. Which is it going to be?


42 posted on 05/03/2006 6:40:32 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief; AntiScumbag; Torie; MineralMan; Congressman Billybob
Of course not, but that's irrelevant. If Taylor loses it won't be because he registered Republicans cross-vote but because he needs registered Democrats and Unaffiliated to win. Only about 36% of the district's voters are registered Republicans. Those Pubbies who are discontented with Taylor will mostly either bite the bullet and fall in line or otherwise just not vote at all.

In any case, to speak to the topic of the thread, I will be extraordinarily surprised if Taylor resigns. The way Taylor wins tough elections is he waits until the last six weeks and then dumps however much money into his campaign that he needs to win, and to date it's worked. I rather doubt he'll see himself as more vulnerable than in 2000 and 2002 when he had major allegations of tax evasion (though Sam Neill was a far inferior challenger).

Besides that, however, I would venture that John Armor (Billybob) is gonna have a really huge uphill climb to push Tom Apodaca, Wilma Sherrill, Nathan Ramsey, Carl Mumpower, Joe Dunn, etc, etc out of the way for the GOP nomination if it comes open.

43 posted on 05/03/2006 6:48:59 AM PDT by AntiGuv ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AntiScumbag
Congressman Billybob: Meantime, the man I'm running against, Charles Taylor from NC, has done all the things that Mollohan has done, just not in numbers quite as large. Millions, but not as many millions.

Antiscumbag: Nah...you didn't bad-mouth him at all. Only just about everytime you opened your mouth on the internet or in an interview.

You lost me here. If Taylor has done something criminally wrong, it is not "bad-mouthing" to attempt to expose his crimes. If Taylor is innocent, then Taylor would have the option to sue for slander.

You are making an awfully good argument for hiding Taylor's misdeeds under the rug.

44 posted on 05/03/2006 6:50:32 AM PDT by demoRat watcher (Keeper of the Anthropocentrism Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher
If

Key word, that.

Since, at this point, there's nothing beyond mere allegations, which anyone can make, the entirety consists of bad-mouthing.

Makes for a wonderfully positive campaign, huh? I'm sure it inspired the voters.

45 posted on 05/03/2006 6:59:35 AM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: demoRat watcher
Not to mention the previously quoted flat statement:

I never "bad-mouthed Taylor." I wrote and published exactly one article that pointed out five different million-dollar and up errors in hie Reports filed with the Ethics Committee.

Which is quite obviously not true, as the above quotes demonstrated.

46 posted on 05/03/2006 7:03:44 AM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AntiScumbag
You seem to have an ax to grind...Which in turn sparks questions.

Where do you live?

Are you now working, or have you ever worked for the Taylor campaign?

Or maybe you work within or for the GOP party?

Or possibly is this just some Internet personal flame war?

Just curious.....

Thanks-

47 posted on 05/03/2006 7:13:32 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Getting honest answers from Congress...is like putting socks on roosters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief; AntiScumbag; Torie; MineralMan; Congressman Billybob

Or maybe I should say that I doubt Taylor sees himself as much more vulnerable than in 2000 and in 2004. Although early in 2002 it seemed he may be, since the late-breaking ethics allegations from 2000 might've had more time to sink in, Neill's campaign never really got off the ground in 2002, as he was rightly written off by just about everyone, since he couldn't seal the deal in 2000 (or even make it all that close).

Taylor probably doesn't see himself as much more vulnerable this year than in 2004 against Patsy Keever. Patsy Keever was a far more experienced campaigner by comparison to Heath Shuler. She was from the population center (Buncombe Co) whereas Heath Shuler is from Waynesville, and is very slightly subject to the 'carpet-bagger' charge since he had settled in Knoxville TN until he decided to run against Taylor (I doubt that'd make any difference though).

Keever's campaign didn't really sink until the last few weeks when she seemed like a flip-flopper on abortion and same-sex marriage.


48 posted on 05/03/2006 7:17:37 AM PDT by AntiGuv ()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange
Where do you live?
Are you now working, or have you ever worked for the Taylor campaign?
Or maybe you work within or for the GOP party?
Or possibly is this just some Internet personal flame war?

Be sure to let me know when you have something of substance to say about a comment I've made. And don't forget to let us know when you stopped beating your wife/kid/dog.

49 posted on 05/03/2006 7:32:46 AM PDT by AntiScumbag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MedicalMess

Your parents named you Griffin Griffin. They watched a lot of "Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman" before you were born?


50 posted on 05/03/2006 7:51:05 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson