Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Maher challenged to intelligent-design debate
World Net Daily ^ | 05-10-06 | WestVirginiaRebel

Posted on 05/10/2006 2:54:55 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel

A Christian author and TV host whose latest book, "Intelligent Design Versus Evolution: Letters to an Aethist," debunks Darwinism has challenged fellow television personality Bill Maher to a public debate on the origins of the Earth.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2nitwitshavedebate; creationism; idiots; idjunkscience; intelligentdesign; rayconmancomfort; smarmylefty; smirkingpinko; youngearthcultists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: WestVirginiaRebel

Hah! This blows evolutionism clean out of the water. If life evolved from pond scum as Evolutionists claim, then how come we still have Bill Maher?


21 posted on 05/10/2006 3:26:45 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton; aculeus; spetznaz
Please turn to page 37 in your hymnal...
22 posted on 05/10/2006 3:27:52 PM PDT by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon; Elpasser
Evolution is the same junk science as "global warming"

Yes, along with "gravity" and "physics" and "chemistry" and all the rest of those Godless Athiest Liberal Pinko so-called "theories" and "sciences."

23 posted on 05/10/2006 3:28:21 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Any guest worker program that does not require application from the home country is Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Shouldn't a prerequisite to participating in an "intelligent-design" debate be intelligence?
24 posted on 05/10/2006 3:28:21 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ISLAM: The Other Psychosis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
This blows evolutionism clean out of the water. If life evolved from pond scum as Evolutionists claim, then how come we still have Bill Maher?

Au contraire -- this is proof OF Evolution. Just like some forms of animals did not evolve (at least into Homo Sapiens), some forms of pond scum didn't either.

25 posted on 05/10/2006 3:31:17 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Any guest worker program that does not require application from the home country is Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
God Doesn't Believe in Atheists sounds like an intelligent read... Nothing like presupposing the Will or Mind of the Creator of the Universe...
26 posted on 05/10/2006 3:31:56 PM PDT by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Not sure this is worth the time:

1. Weekly World News as the source
2. The Flat earthers are already here and making their usual phht and gurgling noises
3. Bill Maher?

But a courtesy ping to you nonetheless.


27 posted on 05/10/2006 3:33:24 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Any guest worker program that does not require application from the home country is Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

LOL. Now that *would* be funny.


28 posted on 05/10/2006 3:33:50 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Doesn't it take some measure of intelligence to debate intelligent design? That would automatically disqualify Maher...


29 posted on 05/10/2006 3:34:23 PM PDT by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of Satan and a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel

Bill Maher is indeed challenged, intelligence-wise.


30 posted on 05/10/2006 3:34:43 PM PDT by beethovenfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Wouldn't this be something like watching Hillary Clinton and Helen Thomas in a nude mud wrestling match?

A compelling reason for self-blindness with knitting needles? I hope not that bad.

31 posted on 05/10/2006 3:34:55 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Any guest worker program that does not require application from the home country is Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
BWAHAHAHAHA!

A classic!

Thanks for posting!

32 posted on 05/10/2006 3:36:39 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Yes, along with "gravity" and "physics" and "chemistry" and all the rest of those Godless Athiest Liberal Pinko so-called "theories" and "sciences."

Somethings can be verified and tested others cant.

33 posted on 05/10/2006 3:55:01 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

I assure you, theories cannot be verified.

You need to learn what a "theory" is.

and even watching something drop to the floor is not verification of anything.


34 posted on 05/10/2006 3:57:19 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Any guest worker program that does not require application from the home country is Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Bill Maher is just happy to see his name in the same sentence as "intelligent".
35 posted on 05/10/2006 3:59:18 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
and even watching something drop to the floor is not verification of anything.

Can it be repeated and tested? now can evolution? let me know when you make that "way back machine"

36 posted on 05/10/2006 3:59:18 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Micro-evolution has been observed.

Gravity can NOT be tested and repeated.


37 posted on 05/10/2006 4:01:34 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Any guest worker program that does not require application from the home country is Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
A Christian author and TV host whose latest book, "Intelligent Design Versus Evolution: Letters to an Aethist," debunks Darwinism

Cool. Someone please post the peer-reviewed journal articles so I can read them. I mean, Intelligent Design adherent assure me this stuff is pure science, so surely scientific work of such incredible moment as to debunk a 150 year-old paradigm must have a huge amount of research surrounding it in the scientific community, so there must be some journal articles by this guy about that research. Right? Bueller? Bueller??

Oh, wait. I see this is an article from WorldNut Daily. Nevermind. I wonder how they keep getting their articles posted to their website. The mental institution is supposed to have a firewall to prevent that sort of thing.

38 posted on 05/10/2006 4:07:14 PM PDT by RogueIsland (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Micro-evolution has been observed.

so.. ape to human is your hypothesis.

39 posted on 05/10/2006 4:07:43 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003; Junior
Thanks for the ping. Tragically stupid stuff. I shouldn't bother the evo list for this. Amusing, however.
40 posted on 05/10/2006 4:09:52 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson