Posted on 05/14/2006 2:49:05 AM PDT by MaineVoter2002
Just keep 'em talking.
Hi, Andy.
haven't heard from you for a while.
Cold! Cold, but accurate.
"What would these type of people have done during WWII?"
Marched into Auschwitz singing, "Kumbya" and chanting, "Peace, Love!"
Agreed with everything you said, except this. The Dhimms are not willing to risk losing the War. The want to lose the war. They not only hate being out of power, they hate America.
Learned the words to the Horst Wessel? I hate folks to stupid to save themselves....
Learned the words to the Horst Wessel? I hate folks too stupid to save themselves....
I get the impression the Dems believe if Pres. Bush is impeached it will make Mr.Clintons impeachment look minor which IMHO is even more delusional than the usual left wing fantasy but being somewhat delusional has never even slowed them down.
IMO, they are not working in their own or the countries best interests but they think they are right above all else so I expect impeachment issue to be part of the campaign for some Dems.
Also on WMD, are the Dems disappointed that these weapons were not in Iraq for Hussein to use against our troops?
Instead of the number of killed in 3 years it would have been that number or more in a few hours.
I do not get the point of the complaint of no WMD found yet in Iraq. I never have.
I am relieved that so far there has not been a WMD attack but the Dems always sound somewhat disappointed.
Never trust a leader whose face doesn't move.
The Democrats have convinced themselves that Bush was never elected. That is what they are using to convince themselves that they are going to win in a landslide.
If you want to see the Democrats defeated, here is the tactical methodology:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1631282/posts?page=15
That thread and post 49ish within it lists the districts considered vulnerable. It is there to send money to the GOP candidate and if it's driving distance (or if you're bold, flying distance), go there and volunteer for the campaigns.
The Democrats must not be allowed to take power. The crushing blow delivered to them if they don't in November is one from which they may not survive.
Thanks for the article and the links. These people seem to be living in a world of their own. They have a whole plan worked out but they have forgotten that the American people won't take kindly to fabricated reasons for the attempted impeachment for our President. Should the Dems take control of the House, which I doubt seriously, for them to even attempt it will come back to bite them.
>>
Thanks for the link! If anybody lives in a state where their state republicans are secure, it would be helpful if they adopted one or more of the vulnerable republican candidates in another state.
>>
Almost dead on. "Secure". Not the republican, the seat. If you are living in a district where the seat is secure, even if held by a Democrat, then your time and generous money is needed by GOP candidates in dicey districts.
Apart from the WMD which Saddam Hussein had had earlier (and may have sent out of the country during the interval when Colin Powell was trying to talk the French and the Russians into supporting the war), there was a real danger of Saddam developing a nuclear weapon. It's bad enough having to worry about two irrational regimes, North Korea and Iran, having nukes...the dangers to us and to everyone else would be even greater with a third nutjob having that in his arsenal.
If the 'Rats do get a majority and start impeachment hearings, I hope Bush will finally end his 6 years of not deigning to defend himself against scurrilous attacks.
I don't think Hillary would want the Congress obsessed over impeachment in 2007 and 2008--it would remind people too much of the last years of the first Clinton regime.
Amen on that. If he would have started out defending himself, this condition wouldn't exist now.
We went to Iraq because of Saddam's failure to abide by the cease-fire agreement, which in my opinion meant that the 1st Gulf War never actually ended. Not only was he shooting at our planes but the UN instpectors (when they were allowed free access) continued to find UN banned weapons. The inspectors found them, they were not being handed over by Saddam's regime. I believe once Saddam saw that his UN banned weapons were not safe from the UN inspectors, it was then that he began to be less cooperative and began adding all the conditions and increased trickery to the UN inspectors up to the beginning of the war. After the invasion our troops continued to find UN banned weapons. Furthermore, in the post 911 world, Saddam's involvement with terrorists (ie $25,000 checks to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers) actually trumps everything written before this sentence.
I honestly do not remember Bush telling the American people that Saddam has WMD (he never had to, Saddam had used them on his own people). I do remember several speeches where Bush had said that we can not allow Saddam to posess Weapons Of Mass Destruction as he would be able to hold peace in the Middle East hostage and peace in the world. I've heard speeches where Bush had announced that if we allow Saddam time to develop and posess WMD it would change the politcal situation in the Middle East where Saddam would have an upper hand and be able to have more room to manipulate policy in the Middle East.
Yes, we all know what the democrats have said about WMD from 1998 on up to the beginning of the most recent war in Iraq. We have their quotes. We've posted them. We exposed them. Honestly, I remember the democrats claiming Saddam had WMD more than I can Bush ever doing so.
I have been trying to find these Bush speeches where he talked about how we cannot allow Saddam to posess WMD. Has anybody seen them in text anywhere on the net>
I think it's time to contrast to the American people just what the dems had said about WMD with what I have heard Bush say about the dangers of giving Saddam time to develop them.
We did not go to Iraq because we thought he had WMD. If Bush had said that, I would have hesitated to support him sending in ground troops. The WMD issue was only a factor in the decision that we should go SOONER rather than wait until he already had them.
Now that we got the dems quotes out there...it's time we start searching for these pre-war Bush quotes.
Visine must love her! LOL
Pelosi...everything she learned she learned from dear old dad...mob mayor of Baltimore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.