Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbians seeking first gay 'divorce' after three months
The Daily Telegraph ^ | May 19, 2006 | Jonathan Petre

Posted on 05/18/2006 11:46:56 PM PDT by MadIvan

A lesbian couple who could become the first to divorce after "marrying" just three months ago were warned by lawyers yesterday that they may have a long wait.

Liz King, 40, and Daphne Ligthard, 36, registered their civil partnership in Ashford, Kent, on Feb 11 before sharing a honeymoon in Amsterdam.

But the relationship soured after Miss Ligthard accused Miss King of seeing another woman who had been a guest at their "wedding". The couple are now splitting up and face the prospect of dividing their joint assets.

Miss Ligthard said that the break-up came after Miss King said she no longer loved her.

"Liz told me she didn't love me any more, that she hadn't done so for years. I was absolutely flabbergasted," she said.

"I asked her why she had gone through the wedding and she said it was to make me happy. But it was all her idea.

"She even asked if I would change my name by deed poll because she liked the sound of it. We seemed more in love than ever."

She said she noticed something was wrong after Miss King, an amateur triathlete who works in insurance, began spending a lot of time away from home and kept bringing another woman back to the house.

"Liz is into athletics and is a triathlete. She began spending a lot of time training with another girl at her athletics club," Miss Ligthard, who works for Eurostar, told The Sun newspaper.

"They were together every day and this girl began coming round to the house when I was at work."

Miss King said: "I have nothing to say except I feel sorry for Daphne at this time."

Lawyers said that, under the Civil Partnerships Act that came into force in December, the couple could not terminate their partnership until it had been in existence for at least a year.

Moreover, in contrast to marriage, adultery was not recognised as grounds for ending a civil partnership, though unreasonable behaviour could be cited.

Mark Harper, a divorce specialist with the London law firm Withers, said that the dissolution of a partnership was almost exactly the same as any other divorce.

"The court would look at the assets that existed at the start of the relationship," he said. "The presumption would be that assets built up during the course of a relationship would be equally divided even if one partner earned much more than the other."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bogus; divorce; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; licketysplit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last
I think we conservatives can now turn around to the gay marriage lobby and say, "Told you so". There are many fine gay people, but these repeated attempts to somehow make the gay lifestyle fit into a heterosexual model just is a dead end.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 05/18/2006 11:46:58 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Watery Tart; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; pax_et_bonum; Alkhin; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 05/18/2006 11:47:37 PM PDT by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

3 posted on 05/18/2006 11:49:42 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Maybe this one will work better.


4 posted on 05/18/2006 11:50:53 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

ROTFLMAO! As if no one saw this coming!


5 posted on 05/18/2006 11:50:58 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Personally I find it rather silly that gays getting divorced is taken to signify anything more or less than straights getting divorced.


6 posted on 05/18/2006 11:53:35 PM PDT by AntiGuv (How is Mexico our friend?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: MadIvan

the wages of sluttishness is quick separation....


8 posted on 05/19/2006 12:30:15 AM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I think it is obvious that they were unable to consumate their so-called marriage.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

9 posted on 05/19/2006 12:32:45 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

This story is making my hot.


10 posted on 05/19/2006 12:35:45 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

This story is making your hot...what?


11 posted on 05/19/2006 12:48:25 AM PDT by Bender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bender

Making my me hot.

I should proofread more often, I guess.


12 posted on 05/19/2006 12:52:06 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse
The couple are now splitting up and face the prospect of dividing their joint assets.

"OK. You can take 'Thruster, but I get 'Penetrato.'"

13 posted on 05/19/2006 2:23:35 AM PDT by Socratic ("I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I'm watcing Fred and Ginger in "Swing Time" on TCM right now. Hope that doesn't mean I have tendencies.
14 posted on 05/19/2006 2:35:46 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
But the relationship soured after Miss Ligthard accused Miss King of seeing another woman who had been a guest at their "wedding". The couple are now splitting up and face the prospect of dividing their joint assets.

Sounds like a Soap Opera

15 posted on 05/19/2006 2:43:56 AM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socratic
Liz King, 40, and Daphne Ligthard, 36

Lick king and Lick hard

Don't tell ME there's nothing in a name ... no one names their daughter Jezebel.

16 posted on 05/19/2006 2:44:21 AM PDT by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knarf
...no one names their daughter Jezebel.

At least, not yet.

17 posted on 05/19/2006 3:05:02 AM PDT by Socratic ("I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I see a dildo custody battle on the horizon.


18 posted on 05/19/2006 3:08:33 AM PDT by sargunner (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I think we conservatives can now turn around to the gay marriage lobby and say, "Told you so". There are many fine gay people, but these repeated attempts to somehow make the gay lifestyle fit into a heterosexual model just is a dead end.

If you don't know any straight people who have divorced after only a few months of marriage, come to the States and I'll introduce you to my sister. She did it twice -- first marriage lasted seven weeks and the second marriage lasted five months.

19 posted on 05/19/2006 3:14:09 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"She said she noticed something was wrong after Miss King, an amateur triathlete who works in insurance, began spending a lot of time away from home and kept bringing another woman back to the house."

This one is not going to be sending any rockets into space.

Is this known in England as "being called on the carpet"?

20 posted on 05/19/2006 3:46:12 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

I had a college friend who I think may have set a record. She was on her honeymoon at the beach and ran into one of her bridesmaids.

She thought it was a coincidence.

Turned out her husband of 2 days had been seeing her bridesmaid before they got married.

They were drunk in the hotel bar that night and her husband confessed and left her there and went and spent the rest of the week with her bridesmaid.

She went home, got her things and went home to her parents. The divorce went through a year later.


21 posted on 05/19/2006 3:47:26 AM PDT by babydoll22 (If you stop growing as a person you live in your own private hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

"I asked her why she had gone through the wedding and she said it was to make me happy"

What a great reason to get married!!!!

Just shows that lesbians are just as stupid as non lesbians.


22 posted on 05/19/2006 3:51:17 AM PDT by babydoll22 (If you stop growing as a person you live in your own private hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

So...who gets custody of the rug?

23 posted on 05/19/2006 3:53:24 AM PDT by Fintan (I thought I wasted bandwidth...then "The DaVinci Code" was released.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babydoll22

Not quite but it sounds a bit like "The Heartbreak Kid" (Grodin, Shepard and Eddy Albert).


24 posted on 05/19/2006 3:53:40 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sargunner
I see a dildo custody battle on the horizon

lol...

So "She got the gold mine, I got the shaft" takes on a new meaning as well.

25 posted on 05/19/2006 3:58:08 AM PDT by sayfer bullets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

It'd take a pretty sick individual, male or female, to be attracted to a female tri-athlete, my appologies to any female tri-athletes reading this.


26 posted on 05/19/2006 4:09:34 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: MadIvan

I guess this just proves the old adage, "The carpet is always greener on the other side."


28 posted on 05/19/2006 4:10:35 AM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I think we conservatives can now turn around to the gay marriage lobby and say, "Told you so". There are many fine gay people, but these repeated attempts to somehow make the gay lifestyle fit into a heterosexual model just is a dead end.

Unfortunately, this is just the sort of scenario that will draw HUGE lobbying in favor of legitimizing. Can you just see the lawyers drooling over the boom in the divorce industry? We can say what we want, but this movement has powerful allies and we can't underestimate their ability to have gay marriage "rammed through" as law.

29 posted on 05/19/2006 4:10:39 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Miss Ligthard said that the break-up came after Miss King said she no longer loved her.

Sounds like Miss Ligthard "has had the rug pulled out from under her".

30 posted on 05/19/2006 4:23:16 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socratic

But who gets the 9v batteries?


31 posted on 05/19/2006 4:31:20 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Who are they kidding. They wanted this to get to court. Recognizing the divorce, recognizes the marriage. They are just toooooo clever.


32 posted on 05/19/2006 4:35:18 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Marriage is only between a man and a woman for the purpose of bearing children. Anything else is a mock marriage. According to vermin this is not so; they open the door for "marriage" between a woman and her son, a man and his dog, a woman and her men, and so on, by that illogical rationale.

So now we have a mock divorce?


33 posted on 05/19/2006 4:39:55 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

They just lost their "taste" for each other.

A good strawberry douche could have saved this marriage.


34 posted on 05/19/2006 4:41:01 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

"Making my me hot.

I should proofread more often, I guess."

Or type with both hands. ;-p


35 posted on 05/19/2006 4:50:24 AM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Moreover, in contrast to marriage, adultery was not recognised as grounds for ending a civil partnership, though unreasonable behaviour could be cited.

Adultery doesn't count as "Unreasonable behavior"? Would something like excessive channel surfing constitute "unreasonable behavior"? How about mixing plaids and stripes?

36 posted on 05/19/2006 4:59:47 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine
Is this known in England as "being called on the carpet"?

I'm not sure carpet is the best metaphor here! :)

37 posted on 05/19/2006 5:06:26 AM PDT by IamConservative (Who does not trust a man of principle? A man who has none.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

It reminded me to vacuum my carpets today.


38 posted on 05/19/2006 5:28:08 AM PDT by sine_nomine (No more RINO presidents. We need another Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: EarnestWorm

Yes. Divorce for gays is laughingly unreal.


40 posted on 05/19/2006 5:45:49 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

What good is a story on lesbian tri-atheletes without pictures?


41 posted on 05/19/2006 5:54:51 AM PDT by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Gay marriages are a potential gold mine for lawyers. They'll have all those new legal definitions and findings to test.

Never mind the awful fallout and lives destroyed in the process, plenty of them will have many billable hours and lots of new $$$ available to them.

Ba$tard$ all!

Pinz


42 posted on 05/19/2006 6:01:13 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez (Charter Snowflake, Rummy fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

I agree with you 100%. Granting a divorce accepts the "marriage" itself as a reality, which is not something we want to see happen. But on the lighter side, isn't there some joke that asks "How can you tell a lesbian on her second date?" and is answered with "By the bags of clothing, the two cats, and the U-Haul."


43 posted on 05/19/2006 6:03:01 AM PDT by awakened (The evidence of God's existence far outweighs the proof of His absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; DBeers

This is just one more step in the 'normalisation' of gay marriage. Even though it isn't actually called marriage, the whole process mirrors heterosexual marriage and the homosexual community always refer to it as marriage.

The 'gay divorce' process is another step nearer putting homosexuality on a par with normal relationships.


44 posted on 05/19/2006 6:14:54 AM PDT by mikeyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
irreconcilably differences?
45 posted on 05/19/2006 6:17:07 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF...8th TFW...Ubon Thailand...408thMMS..."69"...Night Line Delivery...AMMO!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Too bad there isn't a place like Reno where they can get it done "lickity split " :-)


46 posted on 05/19/2006 6:45:34 AM PDT by cryptomc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
first to divorce after "marrying" just three months ago

It was quick.

47 posted on 05/19/2006 6:53:41 AM PDT by A. Pole (Dzerzhinsky: There are no innocent people.There are only such who weren't examined in the proper way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I think we conservatives can now turn around to the gay marriage lobby and say, "Told you so". There are many fine gay people, but these repeated attempts to somehow make the gay lifestyle fit into a heterosexual model just is a dead end.
Regards, Ivan



Ivan, I am with you. The only thing they will do is throw Briney back in our face or Renee or any other hetro marriage that didn't even last 3 months. I don't think that divorce is enough to stop this marriage debate. We need more than that.


48 posted on 05/19/2006 7:10:13 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Who'll get custody of the cucumbers?


49 posted on 05/19/2006 7:30:07 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson