Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Talk at Lunch That Shifted the Stance on Iran
NYT ^ | 6/4/06 | HELENE COOPER and DAVID E. SANGER

Posted on 06/03/2006 11:03:37 AM PDT by bnelson44

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Founding Father
President Bush does not consider the Mexican bus boy climbing the wall (in the picture ypou posted) as dangerous to our national security as the islamic terrorist regime in Iran having a nuclear weapon. Please do not turn this thread into an illegal immigration one.
21 posted on 06/03/2006 12:02:28 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
If Iran does not stop in six months or so building their nuclear weapon program, they will be bombed by us back to the seventh century where they like to be. Iran will not have the nuclear bomb as long as GW Bush is President.

What's the name of your doctor? I want the same meds you're on. LOL

22 posted on 06/03/2006 12:02:40 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
A Talk at Lunch That Shifted the Stance on Iran

What'd she say? "Hey, we've already negotiated with Abu Mazen, the financier of the '72 Munich Massacre. What's a few mad mullahs next to that?"

23 posted on 06/03/2006 12:03:10 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

The United States blinks.

North Korea Redux? But more dangerous with catastrophic consequences. I doubt we can blame Clinton this time?

Bush is being played. By Iran. By the Europeans. By Rice(State).

If anyone reading this believes that any type of negotiations will stop Iran's nuclear program- respond.

If anyone believes France and Russia, and others, will not try to block us even after an attempt at negotiations fail- respond.

If you believe negotiations will amount to nothing and at the dead end the International community will still be against us pursing any serious action against Iran- you're wiser then the President.


24 posted on 06/03/2006 12:08:05 PM PDT by Sabramerican (Bandar Bush in 08: Continue the Legacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pox
I like that the ball is now in Iran's court.

Seemingly no one on this forum is appeasable on any front at all.

25 posted on 06/03/2006 12:10:43 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Please do not turn this thread into an illegal immigration one.

Like so many others you have missed the point completely. That "mexican bus boy" you refer to could easily be (and maybe has been) an islamic terrorist.

It is a joke (and dishonors those who serve and defend) to fight terrorists around the world (which I agree needs to be done) and leave your borders undefended thus allowing those same terrorists to walk right in.

An illegal immigration issue, no sir, this is a security issue.

26 posted on 06/03/2006 12:11:25 PM PDT by Founding Father (I'm building a fence near Palominas, Az. along with my "vigilante" friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

But the thread is about Iran


27 posted on 06/03/2006 12:18:32 PM PDT by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

So True but ROFLMAO.


28 posted on 06/03/2006 12:21:47 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican

the president knows that negotiations will not work on iran. the point of negotiations is to prove to the rest of the world how crazy this guy is. that way we can get some europeans to go in with us and take a few bullets for us.


29 posted on 06/03/2006 1:19:53 PM PDT by brannon (now hold on there son....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: brannon

2007 won't be a good year for the Iranian mullahs.

Mark it....Bush will NOT leave the Presidency without blocking Iran's path to nuclear weapons.


30 posted on 06/03/2006 3:34:46 PM PDT by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pox
Don't fall for this NYTimes smear piece..."Oh whoa is us"...please...

How about an Israeli take on what's going on?

http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=1170

----------

"The US secretary of state said the US was willing to join European allies in direct talks with Iran - provided Iran abandoned its uranium enrichment program. Tehran predictably dismissed the offer as propaganda and presenting no “new and rational solution” to Iran’s nuclear case. The enrichment program would go on, declared Iran’s foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki.

Rice had her answers ready for that response. Anticipating an Iranian brush-off, the US has already begun implementing its own package of sanctions. As Rice put it, “We’re prepared to go either way.”

She also made it clear that the United States would not “swear off ever using military action.”

The two parties are therefore closer to a collision course – first financial and, further down the road, military - than to dialogue. "

-----------

This is nothing more than the Times try to color the administration.
31 posted on 06/03/2006 4:53:34 PM PDT by Khepri (ETHEREAL TAGLINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

"Mr. Bush left open the option of scuttling the entire idea until early Wednesday morning, three senior officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were describing internal debates in the White House."

Another leak. Does anyone besides me have a problem with this?


32 posted on 06/03/2006 5:10:27 PM PDT by Excellence (Since November 6, 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

Instead of total war, I really wish we could find a way to get rid of the hate-mongers who are instilling fear in the Iranian people. That would take care of 99% of the problem right there. The people of Iran like a lot of Western things, but they're very nationalistic and obtaining the bomb and being (in their minds) on an equal footing militarily with the rest of the world is important to them because their "religous" leaders and others have convinced them that obtaining the bomb is the only way for them to protect themselves from the "evil" West.


33 posted on 06/03/2006 6:02:07 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Just relax both of you

Thank you. This is something that needs to be said more often around here.


34 posted on 06/03/2006 8:54:12 PM PDT by Valin (http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Typical people like him... its "his topic or no topic"

I'm really starting to LOATHE a few nicks on here.


35 posted on 06/04/2006 8:38:50 AM PDT by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon
They can't stand any thread not being about immigration.

If its on WoT, they turn it into immigration. If its a spending bill, they turn it into immigration. If its a Judaical debate, they turn it into immigration. If its a media piece, they turn it into immigration. If its a live thread, they turn it into immigration.

Is getting REAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLY old.
36 posted on 06/04/2006 8:40:20 AM PDT by FreedomNeocon (Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon

I do not think they are learning. FR moderators have banned so many of them including their LEADER and they still do not get it.


37 posted on 06/04/2006 12:38:38 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson