Posted on 06/10/2006 2:46:32 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel
Ann Coulter criticized four of the women whose husbands died on 9/11, and now a congressmen from the New York/New Jersey area has written a scathing letter-signed by nearly two dozen other congressmen-to the author.
In Coulter's new book "Godless: The Curch of Liberalism," she wrote, "I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much," and that the four were "reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by giref-arazzis."
In response, House Democrats from Long Island and New York City have signed their names to a letter drafted by Rep. Steve Israeil (D-Hungtington) demanding that Coulter apologize.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
That's great. So shouldn't everyone be that believes in limited government. That merely identifies you as someone who sees a good deal and has latched onto it. That alone doesn't make you a true conservative.
I'm pro-life
As an evolutionist, on what basis are you pro-life? There is no morality associated with Darwinism, only survivalism at both the exploitation and expense of others. Who are your lesses, and those not sufficiently evolved to your liking? Exterminate your competition before it exterminates you, right? You're the "enlightened" evolutionist: and so was Margaret Sanger -- who was pro-life for what she considered to be the worthy and the elite only. How about you?
there's nothing in the Constitution that involves evolution.
I agree. Nothing to do with the founding of this nation either, and a difference in worldviews whose outcomes are poles apart.
Political thought borne from application of Darwinist Huxleyism, while feigning political legitimacy as it masquerades as science is what gives rise to the Hilters, the PolPot's, and the Stalins -- and the Margaret Sangers. Indeed, the premise of evolution has no legitimacy in either conservatism or in science: science, that is, which is studied in the pursuit of truth.
I accept the evidence for evolution
Then you have not studied the "evidence" very closely. A creationist studies all evidence and ignores none. An evolutionist studies only what he thinks he can twist to fit his model and ignores what doesn't. The evolutionist is self-deceived. True conservatives will not allow themselves to be deceived in this way.
And as an evolutionist, that's where she's talking to you.
How about, "Shove it where the sun don't shine, Stevie boy!";)
Yes but has no horny
(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")
Ted Rall's cartoon (and yes I have seen it ) specifically targets all the 9/11 Widows.
AC's antics, target 4 particular women--the aforementioned "jersey girls."
Your comparison of the two seems quite dishonest to this reader as you make no mention of these facts.
(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")
So how should Ann respond?
Her publisher must be thrilled - all the material she needs to kick start her next book. Suggested Title: "Gutless Wonders object to 'Godless Liberalism' "
Wow, am I stupid! It just hit me that all these politicians believed it was IMPORTANT to send her a letter! Obviously they know the impact she can have. Way to go, Ann!!
I'm sure she will. She has definitely hit home for the poor libs.
RINOs kiss butt to get elected.
To Ann Coulter?
Scathing?
Forgive me, but isn't that a bit like a black widow spider being "ravished" by her mate?
wow. A letter. That a leave a mark.
You mean the exploitation and expense of other species. Not other individuals. Even Christians believe that humans come before other animals.
It's not "every individual for himself." That is a misstatement of what evolution is.
Animals that live in groups have rules that each animal must live by. Animals that don't live by the rules are punished or exiled. Surely you know this.
My worldview, by the way, is not based on a scientific theory anyway. Science will only take you so far.
My worldview is based on Theravada Buddhism, which I believe best helps me prepare my soul for the afterlife. And science doesn't mean squat to my immortal soul or my belief in God.
Who are your lesses, and those not sufficiently evolved to your liking?
Evolution is not teleogical, there is no physical "goal". Everyone is evolved as much as they are.
Exterminate your competition before it exterminates you, right?
Again, my "competition" is not human. Only other species that might pose a danger to me are.
You're the "enlightened" evolutionist: and so was Margaret Sanger -- who was pro-life for what she considered to be the worthy and the elite only. How about you?
No, I am not a bigot. Racism is not enlightening.
A creationist studies all evidence and ignores none.
I've yet to see any proof of that. I've seen over and over again creationists who refuse to read anything that is not creationist literature.
Why'd you feel the need to call your buddies in?
Can't take me on by yourself?
I just saw Ann on Fox News talking to John Kasich. Poor John intended to criticize Ann's book - and further used his wife's comments to downplay the book. Unfortunately, neither had read the book. Ann was gentle in pointing out that they were passing judgment on what she had written without even having read it.
She could have easily ripped him a new one – and he would have deserved it.
Bravo.
They don't like what she said (because it's true), so their response is to give her another round of free publicity and make her rich as her books continue to sell?
Hey, I'm sure Ann is loving it but it proves what morons these Democrats are. Whatever mileage they get out of this in an election year among their own constituents, is far outweighed by what Ann gets. Money and a forum to tell the American people how they've been using "victims" to sell their propaganda unchallenged.
They don't know when to shut up.
You asked piercing questions at # 165. Wouldn't you like to hear the cable news guys explain why all of them had Michael Berg on as guest the day Zaqawi was killed?
It went beyond bizarre to hear him, over and over defend the man who slit his son's throat.
Hope they deliver it in person.
Hope they deliver it in person.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.