Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hidden General Stan McChrystal runs 'black ops.' Don't pass it on
Newsweek ^ | June 26, 2006 | Michael Hirsh and John Barry

Posted on 06/19/2006 1:46:19 PM PDT by RDTF

June 26, 2006 issue - No one would have mentioned his name at all if President George W. Bush hadn't singled him out in public. Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, West Point '76, is not someone the Army likes to talk about. He isn't even listed in the directory at Fort Bragg, N.C., his home base. That's not because McChrystal has done anything wrong—quite the contrary, he's one of the Army's rising stars—but because he runs the most secretive force in the U.S. military. That is the Joint Special Operations Command, the snake-eating, slit-their-throats "black ops" guys who captured Saddam Hussein and targeted Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi.

JSOC is part of what Vice President Dick Cheney was referring to when he said America would have to "work the dark side" after 9/11. To many critics, the veep's remark back in 2001 fostered his rep as the Darth Vader of the war on terror and presaged bad things to come, like the interrogation abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo Bay. But America also has its share of Jedi Knights who are fighting in what Cheney calls "the shadows." And McChrystal, an affable but tough Army Ranger, and the Delta Force and other elite teams he commands are among them.

After the Zarqawi strike, multinational forces spokesman Gen. Bill Caldwell refused to comment on JSOC's role, saying, "We don't talk about when special operating forces are involved." But when Bush revealed to reporters that it was McChrystal's Special Ops teams that had found Zarqawi, Caldwell had to gulp and say (to laughter), "If the president of the United States said it was, then I'm sure it was."

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqeda; bush; gwot; mcchrystal; supportthetroops; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 06/19/2006 1:46:22 PM PDT by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RDTF
God bless our black ops people.

We do not want to nor need to know every thing that is being done to keep us safe in this country.
2 posted on 06/19/2006 1:49:02 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Leave it to Newsweak to "out" the good guys and hide the bad guys. Fools.


3 posted on 06/19/2006 1:49:39 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Rumsfeld is especially enamored of McChrystal's "direct action" forces or so-called SMUs—Special Mission Units—whose job is to kill or capture bad guys,

Which is just another clear reason why SecDef Rumsfeld is the perfect man for the job in today's world.

4 posted on 06/19/2006 1:51:37 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

They are heroes, pure and simple. Thank God they're on OUR side!


5 posted on 06/19/2006 1:51:53 PM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Man was made in the image of God, not pond scum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw
Leave it to Newsweak to "out" the good guys and hide the bad guys. Fools.

Uh, in case you missed it, it was President Bush who outed him. I saw it live, as well as poor Gen. Caldwell later trying to answer without answering.

6 posted on 06/19/2006 1:53:34 PM PDT by Gondring (If "Conservatives" now want to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
>Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, West Point '76, is not someone the Army likes to talk about





Of course, he does have
his own action figure and
Marvel comic line . . .

7 posted on 06/19/2006 1:54:37 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Agreed


8 posted on 06/19/2006 1:55:25 PM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Experts partisan hacks like former (Clinton) Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders. Without proper civilian oversight, a Zarqawi-style success can easily become a "Black Hawk Down."

It was civilian oversight by The Stain® and his cronies that gave us "Black Hawk Down" in the first place

9 posted on 06/19/2006 1:57:29 PM PDT by tx_eggman (Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

"the snake-eating, slit-their-throats "black ops" guys"

Wonder if they have snake flavor MRE's for these guys?


10 posted on 06/19/2006 2:02:40 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Experts like former Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders.

Why is it not surprising that a Deputy Defense Secretary in the Clinton Administration would be critical of Special Ops? If Special Ops would have been supported by Clinton, we might not be in the situation we're in now.

11 posted on 06/19/2006 2:03:49 PM PDT by jazusamo (DIANA IREY for Congress, PA 12th District: Retire murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Here is the dichotomy. The Black Ops people still got to fight for their budgets. You got to have good PR to get political muscles to pull in the Budget Wars for you but Spec Ops hates to talk about what they do since keeping Methods and Means secret is life and death for them.

Read "Masters of Chaos". Spec Ops is finally starting to play the game. I think that is a good thing.
12 posted on 06/19/2006 2:04:26 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party! For people who prefer slogans over solutions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Oops.


13 posted on 06/19/2006 2:04:34 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gondring
Umm I seriously doubt having the top guy's name know is going to hurt them in the least. It's a two way street. Good PR gets you political pull. Classifying everything makes you prime target when the budget knives comes out. Spec Ops has to learn they CAN be TOO secret.
14 posted on 06/19/2006 2:06:53 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party! For people who prefer slogans over solutions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

I hear he goes by another name: Jack Bauer.


15 posted on 06/19/2006 2:08:22 PM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll. 17,406+ snide replies and counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Experts like former Deputy Defense secretary John Hamre are also concerned that Special Ops now has generic authority to deploy where it wants without case-by-case orders. Without proper civilian oversight, a Zarqawi-style success can easily become a "Black Hawk Down."

Sure, if only their had more 'civilian control' in Somalia, the whole thing could have been avoided... /s
16 posted on 06/19/2006 2:11:41 PM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

17 posted on 06/19/2006 2:12:26 PM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow

A "black ops" ping...


18 posted on 06/19/2006 2:14:37 PM PDT by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

I'm pretty enamored of them too!


19 posted on 06/19/2006 2:16:15 PM PDT by Shimmer128 (I see dumb people, they're everywhere. They don't even know they're dumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Daus
Without proper civilian oversight, a Zarqawi-style success can easily become a "Black Hawk Down."

Um, didn't "Blackhawk Down" become a "Black Hawk Down" because of the "civilian oversight" not wanting to do soemthing un-PC, rather than just letting the military do its job?
20 posted on 06/19/2006 2:23:09 PM PDT by Thrusher ("...there is no peace without victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson