You also validate that the specific aging system is not so reliable as many scientists would like you to believe.
The only thing I'm validating is that the author of this article intentionally used a known invalid test to try to make his point.
You're not going to win any arguments doing that.
Actually two invalid tests. Carbon 14 is also quite inaccurate when aging things over several millenia old. Can you tell me of an aging system that has not been shown to be inconsistent?
posted on 08/01/2006 3:16:06 PM PDT
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson