Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The celestial fraud
National Post ^ | 2006-08-18 | (editorial page)

Posted on 08/18/2006 4:38:41 AM PDT by Clive

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: aruanan
Pluto's orbit is also exceptionally eccentric. It and Neptune are the only planets currently in gravitational resonance with one another. (If it was not in gravitational resonance, with Neptune they would have collided eons ago and we wouldn't even be having this conversation.)

Billions of years ago Jupiter and Saturn were in gravitational resonance, in fact Jupiter orbited further from the Sun than Saturn. Jupiter got pumped up with Saturn's angular momentum and tossed the old man into the further recesses of the solar system.
41 posted on 08/18/2006 9:12:07 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Didn't these idiots check a dictionary to see if a pre-existing definition of "pluton" was in use? It turns out there is a good scientific meanng to "pluton", that of a large igneous rock mass deep within the Earth, often a rock mass that rises (slowly) to the surface such as that pink granite mountain in Acadia National Park in Maine which has a sign on it identifying it as a PLUTON. Or is their lofty science so above geology.......


42 posted on 08/18/2006 9:38:05 AM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poincare; Verginius Rufus; hellbender

Ooops. Now having read the comments, I agree that "goofies" fits.


43 posted on 08/18/2006 9:44:27 AM PDT by Poincare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Poincare

"Didn't these idiots check a dictionary to see if a pre-existing definition of "pluton" was in use? "

Even scientific terms can have more than one definition.


44 posted on 08/18/2006 10:48:19 AM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
According to the World Almanac, Venus' sidereal day (relative to the stars) is 243.02 earth days long (it spins in retrograde direction). They note that "if it were exactly 243.16 days, Venus would present the same face toward Earth at every inferior conjuction."

I gather that the earth's gravitational pull has affected Venus' rotation--but why isn't it already 243.16 days? Just slow getting there?

45 posted on 08/18/2006 10:51:50 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Pluto was named for astronomer Percival Lowell in his honor since he had been looking for a planet right about there. He never actually saw Pluto. He did see canals on Mars and drew detailed maps of the intricate network, even though they weren't there to see. See?


46 posted on 08/18/2006 10:52:15 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I expect to see pro and anti Pluto factions forming and flame wars to rival the evo crevo threads soon. :)


47 posted on 08/18/2006 10:54:34 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
It and Neptune are the only planets currently in gravitational resonance with one another

Not to mention earth and Cruithne and the other two quasi moons of earth. Even the tree-hugging Druids recognized that earth and Venus are in gravitational resonance with each other.

48 posted on 08/18/2006 10:56:26 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The orbital periods of the Earth and Venus are in an approximate 8:13 ratio, but not actually in resonance. I know about asteroids in resonance with Earth, but don't count them in planets.
49 posted on 08/18/2006 12:23:48 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

It's a 40 year cycle, not necessarily related to a single period. The oak-hugging Druids don't like this number out in public, but nobody will see the significance anyway.


50 posted on 08/18/2006 12:36:07 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
I gather that the earth's gravitational pull has affected Venus' rotation--but why isn't it already 243.16 days? Just slow getting there?

Some things are just coincidences; if you look hard enough, you'll find a few. I seriously doubt that the Earth has much effect, if any, on Venus' rotational period. Venus will be tidally locked to the Sun (as the Moon is to the Earth) long before it ever notices any effect from Earth.

One day, in about 5 billion years, the Earth will be tidally locked to the Moon, when the lunar month and Earth day will both be about 47 times the length of current Earth day. Currently Charon and Pluto are the only pair of bodies in the solar system known to be in mutual synchronous motion.

51 posted on 08/18/2006 12:39:53 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Thailand?


52 posted on 08/18/2006 12:46:00 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan; RadioAstronomer
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=39841 is a request from ESA for assistance observing the de-orbit of SMART-1 on 3 Sep. The impact will be near the limb and the plume may reach sunlight and be seen with binoculars. The impact will not be seen from Europe.
53 posted on 08/18/2006 1:17:56 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Clive
Solution:

Eight "major planets": four rocky and four gaseous. Any number of smaller but still round "minor planets": some icy, some rocky. Any other natural object not round is an asteroid or a comet.

Problem solved. No new labels like "plutons" or anything.

54 posted on 08/18/2006 1:50:56 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Oh really? Just like in the myth?


55 posted on 08/18/2006 1:57:50 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
One day, in about 5 billion years, the Earth will be tidally locked to the Moon, when the lunar month and Earth day will both be about 47 times the length of current Earth day.

Is there some way that that is Bush's fault? Won't it affect global warming? Won't minorities and women be worse off? Do we need to start pre-emptive reparations? With a day that long, do we need to raise the minimum wage? Isn't the root cause of global slowing really due to globalization and Walmart shipping stuff from China?

/trying to get all the liberal talking points in ...

56 posted on 08/18/2006 2:01:39 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Pluto seemed an appropriate name because it was the name of one of the major Greco-Roman gods (in the same league with Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) and moreover the god of the underworld (which seemed appropriate). That the first two letters were the same as Percival Lowell's initials was another plus.

I think the initial reports tended to give Lowell all of the credit even though he had died in 1916. He was from a prominent family (his brother was President of Harvard University) and had been an eminent astronomer, whereas Clyde Tombaugh was just a farm boy from an obscure family. It was only later that Tombaugh received more credit for his achievement.

57 posted on 08/18/2006 7:21:36 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Sounds like the writer has his knickers in a cosmic twist.


58 posted on 08/18/2006 7:24:03 PM PDT by Redcloak (Speak softly and wear a loud shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive

Pluto as a planet sure has someone's panties in a wad.


59 posted on 08/18/2006 7:34:38 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
I think you failed to notice the tongue jammed firmly in cheek.

These days who can tell?
60 posted on 08/19/2006 4:01:37 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson