Pro-Integration Corporations Should Not Be Shaping Canada's Economic Policy

Vive le Canada ^ | August 15, 2006 | Meera Karunananthan

[1rudeboy]

Anything you say, sugar.

[hedgetrimmer]

Why is it important to you to make this discussion personal and personally insulting?

[1rudeboy]

Because you provide me with no alternative. (Still waiting for a substantive reply to my comment #138).

[Mase]

Personally, I think she's trying to get someone to waste the time in going-back and finding where she admitted she's a woman

Her protestations to the contrary notwithstanding, I think she simply likes all the attention. Male, female or other, I think hedgetrimmer is nothing more than an attention getting device.

[1rudeboy]

It's an awfully peculiar way of grabbing attention. I log-on, check to see if I have any replies, answer them, and log-off. It's not like I sit-around and wait for them to come in.

[Mase]

It's an awfully peculiar way of grabbing attention

Yes, peculiar would be an appropriate (and polite) description. Why else would she debate in endless circles? Its gotta be the attention.

It's not like I sit-around and wait for them to come in.

You also don't believe a road is going to take your sovereignty away or that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a traitorous organization or that the W.T.O. is going to come into your home and take your vitamins and other supplements from you.

[1rudeboy]

Personally, I believe that she is bumping the thread thinking that the headline might swing people to her side. But again, it's an awfully peculiar way of "publicizing" one's position, seeing that the subsequent comments make her look like a fool. I mean, how many hand-grenades can one jump on before the effort becomes counter-productive? Note also that no one new is responding to this thread. Perhaps folks are embarassed for her?

[1rudeboy]

On this thread you invited me to ping you for a response to my question(s), originally presented in comment #138. Glad to oblige.