Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Radical Christianity’ as Threatening as Radical Islam?
GOP USA ^ | September 14, 2006 | Bobby Eberle

Posted on 09/14/2006 10:05:11 AM PDT by beaversmom

Ulcers are hopefully growing in the collective stomachs of ABC executives as they learn just how out of touch and irresponsible Rosie O’Donnell is. Now, as a member of Barbara Walters’ chat show “The View,” O’Donnell has a new forum to spew her left wing rants, and hopefully viewers will send her back to the unemployment line. In a discussion of the events of September 11, 2001, O’Donnell acknowledged that Islamic terrorists killed close to 3,000 innocent people. She then said that “radical Christianity” is just as threatening as radical Islam.

Addressing the 9-11 anniversary and talking about security, co-host Elisabeth Hasselbeck noted that since the attacks of 2001, America has not been attacked at home. “We have not been attacked,” she said. “We are on the offense here.”

O’Donnell, in her infinite wisdom, then interrupted and said that America was attacked “not by a nation” and as a result of Islamic terrorists killing 3,000 innocent Americans, we “invaded two countries and killed innocent people in their countries.”

First, I guess Rosie forgets the fact that Afghanistan, with its Taliban leadership, was the training ground for al Qaeda — the group directly responsible for killing thousands of Americans. That the Taliban sponsored, housed, and protected al Qaeda fighters and leaders. President Bush told the Taliban to turnover al Qaeda leaders or face the consequences. They refused and America took action against our attackers.

Second, America, in response to the attacks, focused its attacks on the Taliban and al Qaeda. Civilian causalties are tragic during the course of war, but, unfortunately, they occur. The point is that we did not target innocent civilians for butchering. This is exactly what radical Islamists having been doing with their attacks.

Hasselbeck noted that the funding of radical islam is widespread. O’Donnell again interrupted and said, “Radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America.”

O’Donnell then added that Iraq and Afghanistan “never threatened to kill us.” What?!?!? Earth to O’Donnell! The purpose of al Qaeda, a group interwoven into the ruling Taliban, is the destruction of the American way of life. In Iraq, on numerous occasions, Saddam Hussein threatened America.

O’Donnell is just plain wrong. In addition to being wrong, her comment on Christianity is scary. At the same time those on the left are telling people to “understand” the views of the terrorists, we see more instances where they are bashing Christianity with impunity. We can’t say anything bad about people who want to kill us… we can’t profile… we can’t do what it takes to protect ourselves… but we sure can bash Christians. What is wrong with this picture?

It is my hope that ABC will learn that things will not change with O’Donnell. If they want to keep main-stream American viewers, O’Donnell needs to go. I’m sure she can find a good spot on Air America where no one is listening.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 5peat; ac; christophobia; persecution; radicalchristians; rosieodonell; rosieodonnell; seenit; tolerantleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2006 10:05:12 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/?p=353

Click on link above to watch video


2 posted on 09/14/2006 10:05:24 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

What about radical pumpkin-headed egotistical FREAKS whose ignorance is matched only by their arrogance?


3 posted on 09/14/2006 10:08:15 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
She then said that “radical Christianity” is just as threatening as radical Islam.

What's even worse is that the audience heartily applauded that statement.

4 posted on 09/14/2006 10:08:27 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America.”

You have to admit she has a point. All those Christians walking into mosques and detonating bombs strap to their backs is out of control. ;o)
5 posted on 09/14/2006 10:09:00 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

I guess Rosie or the rest of them. . .have yet to consider 'radical-Fundamental Leftism. . .and the threat it poses.


6 posted on 09/14/2006 10:09:11 AM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal free. . .or suffer their consequences. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

I nominate her for pinata.


7 posted on 09/14/2006 10:10:16 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Huh, who would have thought? Radical Christianity? You mean like adhering resolutely, unequivically, and steadfastly to the first and second commandment with no alternative??

First Commandment: You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind.

Second Commandment: You shall love your neighbor as yourself.

Yeah, dude, that IS radical!!


8 posted on 09/14/2006 10:10:29 AM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

What an idiot.


9 posted on 09/14/2006 10:11:47 AM PDT by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

The article says -- "In a discussion of the events of September 11, 2001, O’Donnell acknowledged that Islamic terrorists killed close to 3,000 innocent people. She then said that “radical Christianity” is just as threatening as radical Islam."

I said this earlier, on another thread --




Yeah, even here on this FreeRepublic forum, so-called "radical Christians" are feared and are treated as the "enemy".

"Radical Christian" is a code phrase meaning someone who actually believes that there is a God, that God reveals Himself in the Bible, that Jesus Christ is the one way to the Father (as Jesus said, Himself) and that God will do what He says He will do.

In short -- a "Radical Christian" is someone who actually believes the Bible.

That, is apparently, to be feared by all sorts of people, worldwide and in this country. It's so feared that you're hard pressed to find anyone in the Democrat Party who will admit to believing the Bible is true and should be listened to and followed (by means of the Salvation offered by Jesus Christ). The ACLU will fight all day long to keep that message locked up behind closed doors, given out only on Sundays and Wednesdays. Atheists and Agnostics will scream that they are being "imposed" upon, if anything "righteous" is made into law. Politicians prefer to have prayers to Allah, than to have anything mentioning Jesus Christ. They'll support Islam in the United States before they'll support Christianity.

Is there any question as to where this country is headed?




I just got through talking with someone (in a very long thread) how Christians are "anethema" to the Constitution of the United States (if they *really believe* the Bible). And they are *more concerned* about Christians than radical and fascist Muslims.

Quite amazing, actually -- to hear it here, on FreeRepublic.

Regards,
Star Traveler


10 posted on 09/14/2006 10:13:18 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Sounds like sour grapes over the fact that both religious beliefs frown on homosexuality


11 posted on 09/14/2006 10:13:22 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Zarqawi died, liberals cried....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr. Mojo

Let me point out....
A. It was an audience of a day time talk show?
B. What do we care about viewers of day time talk shows?
C. What do we care about people that would take their time to be an Audience of a day time talk show?
D. It was an audience at a womens day time talk show
E. All this adds up to an audience ( Live and at home) with a lower IQ than an canned ham.


13 posted on 09/14/2006 10:13:53 AM PDT by Walkingfeather (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Since the Freepers were so successful in their boycotts of the Ditsy Chicks (as mentioned in a previous thread); why not boycott the View...Of course, that would have to mean that we watched it before...


14 posted on 09/14/2006 10:14:05 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan ("My Friends we did it....we made a difference. ...All in all not bad, not bad at all." Pres. Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

She'll soon be taking her poison over to radio when she joins two other geniuses, Hanoi and Steimen, for a talk radio show. It'll no doubt be praised as "edgy" and "provocative," right before it turns into outright whoring for the DNC leading up to the November elections. One more failure for the great white lesbian whale.


15 posted on 09/14/2006 10:14:29 AM PDT by DPMD (dpmd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

You said -- "What's even worse is that the audience heartily applauded that statement."

And what's even more worse, is to see that very same thing on FreeRepublic.

Regards,
Star Traveler


16 posted on 09/14/2006 10:16:03 AM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Well, at least we know who wears the dildo in her house!
17 posted on 09/14/2006 10:16:52 AM PDT by Edgerunner (The greatest impediment to world peace is the UN and the Peaceniks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Christianity is in fact a definite threat to those like
O'Donnell.


18 posted on 09/14/2006 10:18:10 AM PDT by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Radical liberalism has killed more people in the last 40 years in the US alone, then religion has in the entire history of the planet.

Abortion has killed 45m babies in the US alone. Who knows how many overseas.

If some religious war has killed that many, I've never heard of it.

19 posted on 09/14/2006 10:20:19 AM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
The irony is that should the islomofacists win she would be among the first to lead to the slaughter house, along with the other Hollywood Liberals. The Christians would probably be tolerated, though 2nd class, while the Atheists & Liberals would be dead.
20 posted on 09/14/2006 10:21:22 AM PDT by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson