Posted on 09/17/2006 3:45:13 AM PDT by TaxachusettsMan
And that his entire presentation was not about violence; but purposefully meaning to slam Islam?
You and I are in disagreement. I read the Pope's entire and excellent and scholarly presentation. I came away with understanding his text. You came away understanding the Pope's whole focus was upon that one very minor cite from 900 years ago.
And when the Pope clarifies by asserting this was not what he was on about, you decide it was indeed what he was on about.
Fascinating.
It sure takes a big man to kill a hospital nun.
Maybe one of our former Boston talk-show hosts was right when he said these people are about one rung (at the most) above sand monkeys.
Well that is your opinion then. I see it more as the Pope handing them a pacifier. Appease as I was using it...to pacify.
Baloney.
But I note that you don't care to comment on the cowardice of Pope Shenouda III.
Or the shameful silence of our so-called "partners in the ecumenical dialgoue" (aka Protestants).
Wouldn't it be nice if the Archbishop of Canterbury could leave the gay-bishop debacle for 10 minutes to say a kind word in support of the Pope whose installation he couldn't get to fast enough just over a year ago?
Please!
I am resisting the urge to insult you...
We are at war with islam. The Pope is trying to tell the truth to muslims, not insult them. And the truth borne by the white-hot light of examination is what is missing from islam.
Since you can't seem to understand my comments, I will not respond to you again and would appreciate it if you were to do the same. Good-bye.
The ole poperoo is doing the moonwalk...
I don't care to waste my time on you. Go away!
Appeasement was your term (wasn't it?).
Nope
"I hope that this serves to appease hearts and to clarify the true meaning of my address"
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1702976/posts
Oh, OK: you don't have a response.
I didn't think so.
I am beginning to question your sanity.
Gotcha.
He said they didn't express his thoughts "in ANY WAY".
Disowning the statement in this way is the same as saying he personally disagrees with it.
Which is almost better than an apology.
....we're still waiting.
I still think that we need to get on our horses, ride over there, and kill 'em all.
I didn't realize I was waiting on an apology. Mainstream media, please FOAD.
Suit yourself.
You do have access to FR, apparently.
And probably Google.
The topic is exhaustively covered.
Save your questions, Princess, and go look up the story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.