Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military Orders Suggest Iran Attack (Original Article Is In Time Magazine)
NewsMax ^ | 9/18/06

Posted on 09/18/2006 10:08:31 AM PDT by areafiftyone

Two recent orders by the American military have led some observers to conclude that the U.S. is preparing for an attack on Iran.

One order was a "Prepare to Deploy" command sent to a submarine, an Aegis-class cruiser, two minesweepers and two mine hunters, telling the ships’ commanders to be ready to move by Oct. 1.

The other was a request from the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) for a fresh look at long-standing U.S. plans to blockade two Iranian oil ports on the Persian Gulf.

The orders created a buzz within the military because there are few places in the world where minesweepers could be significant – chief among them, the Strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf, where about 40 percent of the world’s oil passes each day.

"Coupled with the CNO’s request for a blockade review, a deployment of minesweepers to the west coast of Iran would seem to suggest that a much discussed – but until now largely theoretical – prospect has become real: that the U.S. may be preparing for war with Iran,” according to a special report in Time magazine.

The U.S. military routinely makes plans for many different scenarios, and the vast majority of them will never be carried out.

"And yet from the State Department to the White House to the highest reaches of the military command, there is a growing sense that a showdown with Iran – over its suspected quest for nuclear weapons, its threats against Israel and its bid for dominance of the world's richest oil region – may be impossible to avoid,” Time reports.

The magazine’s reporters interviewed dozens of experts and government officials to find out what an attack on Iran would consist of – and what its repercussions might be.

First of all, most observers believe the attack would not involve ground forces and would instead be a massive air campaign against Iran’s 18 to 30 nuclear-related facilities.

But many of the targets are hardened, and would have to be struck repeatedly to ensure that they were destroyed or severely damaged. Some sites are in populated areas, and civilian casualties would be a certainty, according to Time. And there would be no guarantee that the strikes would destroy all nuclear-related sites, because some sites could be undiscovered.

What’s more, the attacks would spark retaliation from Iran that could include ordering a Hezbollah attack on Israel and stepping up the funneling of money and weapons to the Taliban in Afghanistan and insurgents in Iraq.

The likelihood that Iran would also seek to close the Strait of Hormuz is high, and a disruption of the oil supplies flowing through the strait could send oil prices skyrocketing.

That in turn could spur a stepped-up military effort by the U.S. that could even include the "worst case” use of ground forces in an effort to topple the Iranian regime, retired Marine General Anthony Zinni told Time.

For that reason, Zinni believes an attack on Iran is a "dumb idea.”

And that is why the U.S. has sought to emphasize a possible diplomatic solution, Time concludes. One Bush administration official told the magazine:

"Nobody is considering a military option at this point. We're trying to prevent a situation in which the President finds himself having to decide between a nuclear-armed Iran or going to war. The best hope of avoiding that dilemma is hard-nosed diplomacy, one that has serious consequences."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2006 10:08:33 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Where do they come up with this stuff?


2 posted on 09/18/2006 10:10:19 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Read title as: Original Leak In Time Magazine

The enemy of liberty takes another swipe at the good guys.


3 posted on 09/18/2006 10:10:41 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Time Magazine is as bad as the "Enquirer"


4 posted on 09/18/2006 10:10:54 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Newsmax announcement to Tehran via New York.
Get the message Ahm-a-nutjob?


5 posted on 09/18/2006 10:10:57 AM PDT by romanesq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

And by all means, let's reveal the intention - and as many details as we can piece together - in the mainstream media!


6 posted on 09/18/2006 10:11:51 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

I don't believe Time Magazine.


7 posted on 09/18/2006 10:12:24 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Another article in Time claims we'll get the crap kicked out of us "if" we attack Iran. Nice to know that Time is covering all spectrum's before anything happens.
8 posted on 09/18/2006 10:12:58 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
OR one could interpret these orders as this -- The U.S. is preparing for the imposition of U.N. sanctions on Iran for failing to comply with UN resolutions regarding Iran's Nuclear Program.

Part of enforcing any sanctions would be a blockade of Iran's oil ports.

9 posted on 09/18/2006 10:15:24 AM PDT by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commish

If the U.S. farts in the direction of Iran - the Leftist papers have a hissy fit and say we are going to attack!


10 posted on 09/18/2006 10:17:13 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Bizarre.

They're preparing for a BLOCKADE of Iranian oil, not for strikes on Iran.

I believe the only force that will be used at this stage is only that sufficient to enforce a blockade of Iran and to keep the strait open.

Economic sanctions with TEETH.

This is something I have advocated for weeks...of course, I have to believe the administration thought of it before I advocated here:)

11 posted on 09/18/2006 10:17:35 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
It appeared as if the writer had been able to see through the fog...

"The U.S. military routinely makes plans for many different scenarios, and the vast majority of them will never be carried out."

But then the writer cannot fight back the dramaqueen inside of himself...

"And yet from the State Department to the White House to the highest reaches of the military command, there is a growing sense that a showdown with Iran"

12 posted on 09/18/2006 10:19:52 AM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I find it reeeeeealy hard to believe TIME Magazine. They have been spewing the same crap that Scott Ritter has been spewing for a long time. This is a bogus story.


13 posted on 09/18/2006 10:20:21 AM PDT by areafiftyone (Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Historically, a blockade is considered an act of war.


14 posted on 09/18/2006 10:20:27 AM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Neither do I; however, I find the INTENTION remarkable.


15 posted on 09/18/2006 10:21:54 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

TIME's time passed a long time ago.


16 posted on 09/18/2006 10:24:28 AM PDT by Semper Vigilantis (Any aid to the Arab world should be delivered from 40,000 feet - 1000 lbs at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

This was Time magazine? I thought it was the Weekly World News.


17 posted on 09/18/2006 10:27:51 AM PDT by fredhead (Women want me....Fish fear me....I can dream can't I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Two recent orders by the American military have led some observers to conclude that the U.S. is preparing for an attack on Iran.

If true it is about time. US and NATO (under Clinton) attacked Yugoslavia for much lesser reason (Yugoslavia trying to defend itself againts Islamofacist invasion)

18 posted on 09/18/2006 10:28:31 AM PDT by Anticommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon; Mariner
I think Mariner has it right, though preparation is the key word. It's on the table, right in the center of the table, let's say.

CaptRon is correct that blockades are considered acts of war. A blockade will bring some screaming from the usual suspects, but not nearly the type of castigation that bombing would bring.

If Iran doesn't back off, blockade, probably including seizure of some of Iran's offshore platforms, is likely, IMO. I don't see Bush leaving this issue for the next President.
19 posted on 09/18/2006 10:31:25 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Free Iran! WARNING! Forbidden Cartoon: .. . *-O(( :-{>. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Time Magazine is as bad as the "Enquirer"

Time Magazine motto: "All the Gossip, All the Time"

20 posted on 09/18/2006 10:33:36 AM PDT by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson