Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DRAMATIC INCREASE IN HILLARY CLINTON'S DISCLOSED ASSETS: An Alternative Theory
bill clinton, hillary clinton, New York Post | 9.23.06 | Mia T

Posted on 09/23/2006 6:06:48 AM PDT by Mia T

THE DRAMATIC INCREASE IN HILLARY CLINTON'S DISCLOSED ASSETS: An Alternative Theory
(Why we must defeat the clintons NOW: part 2)


by Mia T, 9.22.06

 








ormer clinton political guru, Dick Morris, and his wife and partner, Eileen McGann, are positing a theory of clinton enrichment that attempts to explain the dramatic increase--from as little as $352,000 in 2003 to as much as $50,000,000 in 2005--in hillary clinton's disclosed assets. 1

The authors ask and answer what they believe to be the central question, "What caused the jump? It might have been Dubai." 2

TURN OF PHRASE

The Morris-McGann theory of clinton enrichment turns on the phrase, "dramatic increase." My alternative theory of the crime turns instead on "disclosed assets."

What this is about, I believe, isn't the corrupt peddling of access and influence by the clintons. The clintons have been corruptly peddling access and influence as long as they've been in public life. 3

No. What this is about is bait-and-switch money-laundering. What this is about is the clintons being able to spend their stash.... at last.

PIGS AT THE TROUGH

Prison cells are filled with crooks who got caught because they lived high on a-hog-that-had-no-visible-legal-source. The clintons have, for decades, been amassing that hog. First in Arkansas, and then DC, the clintons have been methodically, corruptly and with impunity amassing a fortune, auctioning off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest--invariably foreign--bidder.
4

FLASHY FEINT

You may have noticed that these days the clintons never miss an opportunity, however oblique, to segue to their purportedly newly acquired wealth.
5

Pundits--most notably Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity--have attributed this compulsion to flash the cash to the intersection of nouveau riche and clinton déclassé. But perhaps it is something more....

Perhaps it is bait-and-switch money-laundering.

Perhaps it is cover for the clintons' countless nuncupative deals and unnumbered Swiss accounts.

Perhaps it is a way, at long last, for the clintons, inveterate schnorrers that they are, to live in a manner to which they've made themselves accustomed... but this time on their own, albeit misbegotten, dime.


1.

 


2.

By purging DC of the professional politician and returning to the idea of the citizen-politician, we would break the power-and-corruption cycle. Post-9/11, we no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to abide that nonsense.--me



Speaking of which, Dick Morris reports today in the New York Post that missus clinton's net worth grew from as little as $352K in 2003 to as much as $50M in 2005.

Morris writes, "What caused the jump? It might have been Dubai."




DICK MORRIS: CLINTON IS A PAID AGENT OF THE CROWN PRINCE OF DUBAI
by Mia T, 03.03.06




3.




(bill + hillary) CLINTON 'CULTURE OF CORRUPTION'
by Mia T, 01.28.06




TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bergertheft; billclinton; binladen; bj; bjclinton; carpetbaggers; chinesecampaignmoney; clinton; clintonistas; corruption; crime; demagogues; dickmorris; elections; hillaryclinton; hillaryscash; hillarysdough; hillarysfunnymoney; hillarysnetworth; hillarysrisingdough; hillarysstash; marcrich; missingrecords; pathto911; paymentsforpardons; perjury; powerwhore; risingdough; saddamhusseinmoney; sedition; socialists; terrorism; terroristmoney; theterrorismstupid; treason; whileclintonslept; whokilledfoster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

1 posted on 09/23/2006 6:06:50 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand

ping


2 posted on 09/23/2006 6:14:14 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Lonesome in Massachussets; yoe; YaYa123; joanie-f; ...

ping


3 posted on 09/23/2006 6:15:26 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Mia T. Bump


4 posted on 09/23/2006 6:20:35 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

ping


5 posted on 09/23/2006 6:20:36 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: E.G.C.

thanx, E.G.C. :)


7 posted on 09/23/2006 6:21:08 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Good morning. Interesting theory. Hillary and i42 must have some strong discipline. I mean, you see it every week when trailer trash hits a lotto. They go hog wild, spend everything, and end up broke again, or dead. Yep, the clintons must have some incredible discipline.

5.56mm

8 posted on 09/23/2006 6:21:16 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f

ping


9 posted on 09/23/2006 6:21:56 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ratrapen

Recall that Vince Foster made numerous quickie round trips to Switzerland....


10 posted on 09/23/2006 6:24:06 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Follow the money.


11 posted on 09/23/2006 6:24:45 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

indeed ;)


12 posted on 09/23/2006 6:26:28 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

... and vice versa. ;)


13 posted on 09/23/2006 6:27:11 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

BTTT


14 posted on 09/23/2006 6:29:59 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

hi there and thanks :)


15 posted on 09/23/2006 6:31:40 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Yep, and the Klintons wasted him as soon as he gave them the Swiss bank acct. #, access code, and proof that the Chinese checks were rolling in.

As for Billary being worth $352K in 2003, I don't believe a word of that and nobody else does, either. It must be nice to have friends at the IRS who whisk your tax forms right through and ask no questions.

16 posted on 09/23/2006 6:32:53 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

This calls for a Congressional investigation! She may be importing illegal Cuban cigars under the Monica Lewinsky brand label.


17 posted on 09/23/2006 6:33:59 AM PDT by RouxStir (US out of the UN and UN out of the US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Consider for a minute where the "Clintons" got their money. When Clinton was President, he approved the transfer of classified missile and satellite technologies to the ChiComs. These technologies enabled them to launch rockets (which had been blowing up on the launch pads or shortly after) and to put their satellites and manned capsules into orbit.

What did the "Clintons" receive for this? No one at my level knows. However, knowing how wild the Clintons are for wealth, one could reasonably expect that the ChiComs paid them for the transfer of technologies. The payment would have been in the hundred of millions of dollars range.

Now, perhaps that wealth is being put on display for whatever purpose. Wait and see what occurs.
18 posted on 09/23/2006 6:35:30 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends - YHWH remembers and is just)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Who killed Vince Foster?


19 posted on 09/23/2006 6:35:45 AM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

One thing is certain: the terrorists prefer that a Democrat be in the Oval Office.


20 posted on 09/23/2006 6:36:57 AM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Thank$


21 posted on 09/23/2006 6:37:35 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

This story will be around for a while. Too much here that could be established through good reporting. NY Post, Washington Times, Fox News, etc... There are enough reporters out there who can fill in the blanks. All will come to light if Hillary runs for Prez.


22 posted on 09/23/2006 6:41:43 AM PDT by Jack Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
The First Grafters
23 posted on 09/23/2006 6:53:57 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Only stupid people would vote for McCain, Warner, Hagle, Snowe, Graham, or any RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

.....The clintons have been corruptly peddling access and influence as long as they've been in public life.....

Which is to say that Bubba never progressed to President. He thought and acted like a governor.


24 posted on 09/23/2006 6:56:07 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Nero fiddled while Rome burned. Clinton screwed around while OBL attacked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
That the clintons sold us out for a few hundred thou of campaign cash now and then was never a credible story line.
From:
WHY HILLARY IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS A NATIONAL-SECURITY NO-NOPART ONE

For more than a half decade, the Clinton administration was shoveling atomic secrets out the door as fast as it could, literally by the ton. Millions of previously classified ideas and documents relating to nuclear arms were released to all comers, including China's bomb makers.

William J. Broad
Spying Isn't the Only Way to Learn About Nukes,
The New York Times, May 30, 1999

Broad would have us believe we are watching "Being There" and not "The Manchurian Candidate." His argument is superficially appealing as most reasonable people would conclude that it requires the simplemindedness of a Chauncy Gardener (in "Being There") to reason that instructing China and a motley assortment of terrorist nations on how to beef up their atom bombs and how not to omit the "key steps" when building hydrogen bombs would somehow blunt and not stimulate their appetites for bigger and better bombs and a higher position in the power food chain.

But it is Broad's failure to fully connect the dots -- clinton's wholesale release of atomic secrets, decades of Chinese money sluicing into clinton's campaigns, clinton's pushing of the test ban treaty, clinton's concomitant sale of supercomputers, and clinton's noxious legacy -- that blows his argument to smithereens and reduces his piece to just another clinton apologia by The New York Times.

But even a Times apologia cannot save clinton from the gallows. Clinton can be both an absolute (albeit postmodern) moron and a traitor. The strict liability Gump-ism, "Treason is as treason does" applies.

The idea that an individual can be convicted of the crime of treason only if there is treasonous intent or *mens rea* runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare.

Calling his position on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty "an historic milestone," (if he must say so himself) clinton believed that if he could get China to sign it, he would go down in history as the savior of mankind. This was 11 August 1995.

Mia T, 2.11.04
BUSH, THE CLINTONS + WMD PROLIFERATION:
The
REAL "Imminent Threat"


HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman





I believe that this espionage case -- the Chinese -- is the worst in the history of this country. They got just about everything that we have and you'll see it in the out years in their development of their weapons.

 

HEAR Sen. Richard Shelby



China space shot has military implications

China launches first manned space flight
Reuters ^ | 10-14-03

Wed 15 October, 2003 02:07 BST

BEIJING (Reuters) - China has launched its first manned space flight from the Gobi desert, Xinhua news agency says, in its bid to become the third country to put a man in orbit after the former Soviet Union and the United States.

The Shenzhou V, or "Divine Ship V", was expected to orbit the Earth 14 times before returning after about 21 hours.

Xinhua said the craft carried astronaut Yang Liwei, 38. The launch on Wednesday, 42 years after the Soviet Union put the first man into space, marked a milestone for China's secretive space programme, which analysts say has its sights set on a manned mission to the moon.


25 posted on 09/23/2006 6:57:57 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine

More than the money, Clinton is hoping for the ChiComs to approve his future nomination as sec-general of the UN.


26 posted on 09/23/2006 7:03:14 AM PDT by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

thx :)


27 posted on 09/23/2006 7:05:01 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bert

a corrupt, inept governor


28 posted on 09/23/2006 7:07:05 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

bump


29 posted on 09/23/2006 7:07:52 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

<< ... the (clintstones), inveterate schnorrers ... >>

Love it!

Shalom Rosh Hashanah 5767, Dear Mia.

Pray and trust you and all of those you love have a blessed and happy New Year!

Blessings - Brian


30 posted on 09/23/2006 7:08:04 AM PDT by Brian Allen ("Moral issues are always terribly complex, for someone without principles." - G K Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: Mia T

If my worth jumped from $350K to $50million in a couple years i know the IRS would expect me to have a good explanation.Unfortunately,I doubt Hillary will be held to the same level of scutiny.


32 posted on 09/23/2006 7:13:38 AM PDT by Thombo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

thank you, Brian. All the same to you and yours. :)


33 posted on 09/23/2006 7:14:25 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

schnorrer = grifter I presume. My wife saw this immediately on election night in '92 on the platform at midnight in Little Rock(If memory serves) when Hillary punched Bill in the shoulder with that obvious "we've struck it rich now" flourish.


34 posted on 09/23/2006 7:14:39 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Once again we see that the klintoons have acted and continue to do so, worse than we can imagine in our worst nightmare. klintoon's legacy two hundred years from now won't be what he thinks. It' ll be full of how the two of them almost collapsed America. I hope they think they're cool while they're her, because they'll burn in hell.


35 posted on 09/23/2006 7:14:55 AM PDT by Issaquahking (Trust can't be bought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


36 posted on 09/23/2006 7:22:52 AM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
schnorrer = grifter I presume. My wife saw this immediately on election night in '92 on the platform at midnight in Little Rock(If memory serves) when Hillary punched Bill in the shoulder with that obvious "we've struck it rich now" flourish.--gusopol3


There is an overlap in meaning. 'Schnorrer' is the more benign term. It's from the Yiddish shnorer, meaning beggar, sponger.

Your wife is, obviously, very perceptive. ;)

37 posted on 09/23/2006 7:27:18 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

my next thread is about the clintons attempt at rewriting history. I hope to post it later today.


38 posted on 09/23/2006 7:29:42 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking; All

clintons'


39 posted on 09/23/2006 7:30:29 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Thombo2

excellent. bump.


40 posted on 09/23/2006 7:31:59 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

A lot of Clinton's money probably came from Red China. Remember when Bill was president he traded supercomputer technology to Red China for yuan. After he was caught he gave back "some" of the money.

Saudi Arabia is also another source for Clinton's vast increase in assets.

But remember this, the key to great wealth in America today is to gain high political office. Ever wonder why someone would spend 10 million dollars of their own money to win a political job that pays less than 200 thousand a year?


41 posted on 09/23/2006 7:39:55 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: growlingrizzlybear

Lookee


42 posted on 09/23/2006 7:48:24 AM PDT by SnarlinCubBear (Save the Earth - it's the only planet with chocolate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

As for Billary being worth $352K in 2003, I don't believe a word of that and nobody else does, either. It must be nice to have friends at the IRS who whisk your tax forms right through and ask no questions.--Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Whatever happened to that UNREDACTED BARRETT REPORT, anyway?

MORE



43 posted on 09/23/2006 7:51:13 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Clinton's dramatic increase in wealth is easily deduced from the public record. Clinton routinely travels giving $300,000 talks. What could an audience hear that is worth this much money? Nothing. The point of the talks is to remind currently elected officials that there is a pot of gold at the end of their reign so long as they bend to the wishes of the paymasters while in power. The paymasters know if they don't demonstrate this after-power payoff that they won't get their way. Who are the paymasters? Hint, they have money.
44 posted on 09/23/2006 7:56:36 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R.W.Ratikal
But remember this, the key to great wealth in America today is to gain high political office. Ever wonder why someone would spend 10 million dollars of their own money to win a political job that pays less than 200 thousand a year?--R.W.Ratikal


Indeed.

By purging DC of the professional politician and returning to the idea of the citizen-politician, we would break the power-and-corruption cycle. Post-9/11, we no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to abide that nonsense.

We must field citizen-politicians of the highest caliber. As envisioned by the founders, the citizen-politicians would ''lend'' their expertise to government and then return to private life. The culture of access, influence and self-interest--and with it, the tyranny--would literally disappear overnight.

With their obvious excellence and assisted by the new technology, the citizen-politician would easily bypass the stacked system to capture the imagination -- and votes -- of the masses.

45 posted on 09/23/2006 7:58:21 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

The $300K talks, especially if you factor in the break in the action after the bypass surgery, aren't nearly enough.

As for the 'pot of gold' problem in American politics, see post 45.


46 posted on 09/23/2006 8:06:14 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
To take your analysis one step further: American politics is a way for the mediocre to achieve fame and fortune.
"... and if you can't teach, you become a politician."

47 posted on 09/23/2006 8:14:28 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Tom Paine
"Consider for a minute where the "Clintons" got their money. When Clinton was President, he approved the transfer of classified missile and satellite technologies to the ChiComs. These technologies enabled them to launch rockets (which had been blowing up on the launch pads or shortly after) and to put their satellites and manned capsules into orbit.

What did the "Clintons" receive for this? No one at my level knows.

I bet the Abel Danger folks turned up the evidence.

48 posted on 09/23/2006 8:20:24 AM PDT by spokeshave (The Democrat Party stands for open treason in a time of war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thanks.


Alex - What is a ping from Mia T for a thousand?
49 posted on 09/23/2006 8:20:34 AM PDT by Issaquahking (Trust can't be bought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

bump


50 posted on 09/23/2006 8:23:29 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson