Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bogus Blog Behind Foley's Fall
radaronline ^ | oct 4, 2006 | Christopher Tennant

Posted on 10/04/2006 2:56:10 PM PDT by blogblogginaway

ABCNews.com brought Mark Foley's boy-chasing to national attention, but it wasn't the first website to flog the story. That dubious honor belongs to StopSexPredators, a pseudo-vigilante blog filled with plagiarized, hastily-assembled posts, which no one seems to have heard of, visited, or linked to before last week—and whose operator has a suspiciously savvy grasp of the news cycle. In other words, a blog whose sole raison d'etre seems to have been to get the Foley ball rolling.

If its time/date stamps are to be trusted (like most free blogware, Blogger allows its users to backdate posts), the pervert-outing anony-site was set up on July 28 as a "clearing house for the public to report sex predators and as a resource for concerned citizens."

One early post, headlined The Sickening Six, naming and shaming the "kinds of sick people who hunt minors for their own sick purposes," is basically an amalgam of plagiarized entries from Crimelibrary, Wikipedia, and Answers.com. (Click here, here, and here, for examples.)

After running just six posts over the summer, the site picked up steam on September 21 when its author wrote, "the blog has been noticed and some shocking emails have been received!!!!" and posted four emails purportedly from "interns" outraged by the heretofore unmentioned Foley and his penchant for teenage boys.

(Of course, if these emails are legit, it means the "interns" somehow stumbled upon the blog, despite the fact that it had not yet been linked to by any other sites, and was virtually indetectible to Google, which ranks sites according to the number of incoming links.)

One "intern" wrote:

"...I came to Washington because I care about the future of America. I wanted to be around good and decent men like President George Bush. Instead, I feel like a piece of meat. The worst part of it for me is there appear to be plenty of my fellow interns who don't mind Foley's particular 'path to power.'"

Three days later, the blogger posted the now infamous "Emails from Congressman Foley to 16 Year Old Page!!!!", claiming they'd been sent in by a reader (despite the fact that they appeared to be scans of faxed printouts). Persons unknown then seeded the link to various political sites—including Wonkette, which promptly dismissed them as fakes. ABC, of course, took them more seriously.

Whoever promoted the story on DailyKos did so only 12 minutes after the fateful post went live at 11:06 a.m.:

Six minutes later, the same person, again writing under the handle WHinternNOW posted the following:

Back on Sept. 5, however, that very same WHinternNOW posted a suspiciously more informed-sounding take on the congressman:

Whoever is behind the blog hasn't responded to emails from Radar or any other outlets, and seems to have lost interest in the site.

"I'm thrilled that so many folks are looking at this simple blog...." the author wrote on October 2, the last day the site was updated. "If you have any ideas that I should post, please let me know. I'm happy to pass along information about the current situation, but would much prefer to keep marching toward the large goal or stopping sex predators. I don't think we'll see it in the Congress anytime soon, so let's focus our energy elsewhere."

What, leaving the party so soon?


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-152 next last
To: missflower00

WTF are you talking about?


101 posted on 10/04/2006 7:50:15 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

Comment #102 Removed by Moderator

To: mkjessup

"National Field Director, DCI Group, Public Affairs (2005)"

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=DCI_Group

the following is there

Los Angeles Times staff reporters Noam N. Levey and Chuck Neubauer, report in their October 2, 2006 story, "Foley Enters Alcohol Rehab Center,"[11] (http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-100206foley,0,5979987,print.story?coll=la-home-headlines) that "Kirk Fordham, a veteran Republican legislative staffer who has worked on Capitol Hill for much of the last 17 years, served as Foley's chief of staff from 1995 to 2004. Fordham also managed Foley's first campaign for Congress, in 1994.

"In 2005, Fordham went to work for DCI Group, a leading GOP political strategy group. The same year, he became Reynolds' chief of staff." Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds (R-N.Y.), to whom the story refers, is chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, which leads the effort to maintain the GOP majority in the House. He hired Forham October 4, 2005. according to a press release of that date.[12] (http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:PB5-bv5kjhUJ:www.house.gov/reynolds/oct4b-2005.htm+Kirk+Fordham&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=4)


103 posted on 10/04/2006 8:07:28 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: missflower00

Ross is not Foley. Check your original post.


104 posted on 10/04/2006 8:17:08 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

Comment #105 Removed by Moderator

To: sam_paine

me, too!


106 posted on 10/04/2006 8:23:30 PM PDT by frankenMonkey (Are there any men left in Washington, or are they all cowards?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

ping


107 posted on 10/04/2006 8:24:34 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revererdrv

Sure she does...and with some level of potential that she's right. I don't think that she is though. The story is unravelling with respect to what the Dims knew and when they knew it, plus the sheer hypocrisy of their behavior given their support for Dims who have done far worse than Foley OR Hastert etc. I'm sure some new revelation will emerge in an attempt to regain traction on the whole republicans are pervs issue....and those too will fail. Republicans will keep the House and Senate....and the Dims will STILL claim victory in some way, manner, or form.


108 posted on 10/04/2006 8:25:20 PM PDT by GLH3IL (Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle

There's a cache.

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:NFuT-CBhL0IJ:stopsexpredators.blogspot.com/+stopsexpredators.com&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1


109 posted on 10/04/2006 8:26:09 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

I hope you are right.


110 posted on 10/04/2006 8:33:08 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Maybe this 18 old man and former page was hitting on Foley


111 posted on 10/04/2006 8:35:35 PM PDT by LauraleeBraswell (Try reading the article before you post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: airborne

Since when can the Senate investigate the House and *why* would that be more trust worthy than the AG, from an actual different branch of gov't, doing an investigation? McCain is a *moron*.


112 posted on 10/04/2006 8:35:56 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace high taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

i tracked down what i saw...
That Leopold owned the stopsexpredators web site.

and, you're right...too speculative

nevermind.


113 posted on 10/04/2006 8:39:15 PM PDT by stylin19a ("Klaatu Barada Nikto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: All; FormerACLUmember; sageb1
Re: 8214 SE 170th Portland, OR 97060

Yahoo maps shows that address here in the 97236-5235 zip code

114 posted on 10/04/2006 9:14:24 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Support Arnold-McClintock or embrace high taxes, gay weddings with Angelides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

Oops, sorry ma'am,
I'm just so used to the men doing a lot of the web related unearthing dirty work that I just assumed!
Sarah


115 posted on 10/04/2006 9:39:23 PM PDT by Sarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
McPain isn't helping.......

When does he ever...our side, that is?

116 posted on 10/04/2006 11:37:38 PM PDT by top 2 toe red (To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL

Totally agree.


117 posted on 10/04/2006 11:56:23 PM PDT by top 2 toe red (To the enemy in Iraq..."Don't bet on American politics forcing my hand!" President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
Foley's a perv and Hastert knew it. Hastert must go.

Before last week, Hastert only knew that Foley had written some e-mails to a former page, and the page got annoyed. The e-mails were not of a sexual nature, but the young man and his parents wanted Foley to quit writing, so they asked Hastert's office to intervene, Hastert told Foley to cut it out, and as far as he knew, Foley did.

Hastert didn't know about the Instant Messages which were apprarently from 2003, and which WERE explicit. When he learned of them, he talked again to Foley and Foley resigned.

Hastert is not the dorm mother for those men. He is not responsible for what they do in their private lives, but he did the right thing by asking Foley to resign, when he did find out what Foley had done, because it involved young men who had served in the Page program in the House.

118 posted on 10/05/2006 12:02:07 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

The only info for the owner of the blog is his or her user id. Google hids everything else. Looking up his user id didn't show anything. If you read his blog, he does say his was lurking here on the Freep one day.


119 posted on 10/05/2006 12:02:30 AM PDT by Freedom is eternally right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

read later


120 posted on 10/05/2006 12:59:42 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

What this gay activist doesn't get...is that all this stuff he's doing to "out" republican gays in the most negative light possible is doing nothing but destroying the very thing one would assume his ultimate goal is....equal rights for homosexuals/lesbians including the right to legally get married. Indeed, the negative and hateful tone of his actions do a great deal to support the notion that gays are unstable, hateful, and unworthy of a respected place in todays society. I personally know and work with serveral gay and lesbian people...all of them are ok people....not like this jerk at all. BUT...this blogger activist and those like him are putting a face on gay culture that they absolutely can't afford to have if they want the respect and dignity they seek.

This guy and the Dims that are egging him on are going to reap a bitter harvest from the animosity they are sewing...


121 posted on 10/05/2006 2:25:12 AM PDT by GLH3IL (Truth: The remedy for liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: JaneAustin

Chances are this was a Media Matters project.


122 posted on 10/05/2006 2:54:09 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter
Foley and Scientology
123 posted on 10/05/2006 4:29:40 AM PDT by T'wit (It is not possible to "go too far" criticizing liberals. No matter what you say, they're worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; YaYa123
Yaya had an interesting theory yesterday, in which she thinks these boys weren't "victims" but rather were kids who thought Foley was creepy and egged him on to see what they could get him to say.

And following your theory, IM's which were saved and passed around for laughs could have fallen into democrat hands quite easily.

124 posted on 10/05/2006 4:33:39 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
So, are you really Tom Lantos?

I do not think Foley needs to do more than face up to whatever criminal charges he may face and return to the Church, do penance, and live a celibate life.

Offing himself is not required.

125 posted on 10/05/2006 4:37:39 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus

Google's cache pages usually give the date that the web crawler recorded it. I don't see a date on there. I tried using "view source" in case it was obscured, but it wouldn't work. Odd.


126 posted on 10/05/2006 5:21:54 AM PDT by Axhandle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Re: 8214 SE 170th Portland, OR 97060 Yahoo maps shows that address here in the 97236-5235 zip code

Looks like an unihabited farm/industrial building in a rural area. The ZipCode is all wrong, boistering the total fake nature of the blog's appearance.

127 posted on 10/05/2006 6:11:12 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
The IMs in question were with a former page who was 18 years old at the time of the IM chat (assuming that the IM log wasn't faked by this blogger.) Slimy yes, but definitively not illegal.
128 posted on 10/05/2006 7:06:06 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
The IMs to the 18 yr old weren't illegal. If they were forged and passed off to the media/Dems as legit then that may well be illegal.
129 posted on 10/05/2006 7:20:13 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: GLH3IL

I think that it is too late, the damage has been done. The rabid gay activist has done his job, he's proven that gays cannot be trusted in a position of authority, especially not with kids.


130 posted on 10/05/2006 7:30:05 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
I bet Foley had a special relationship with the scis. Southpark re-ran the episode where Chef fell into a crevasse and was eaten alive by a mountain lion, then a bear and came back in bionic form. Molesting boys makes morlocs and morlocs make thetans which give the scis "energy". I wonder how much "energy" Foley got from "The Adventurer's Club". That's why L. Ron Hubbard lived in a yacht instead of on land: so that he wouldn't get in trouble with authorities. Time Magazine has also documented all of the above.

The scis are also fond of crist.

131 posted on 10/05/2006 10:35:16 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
Did Hastert resign yet? I feel a resignation coming on. I am not near television. The rinos should NEVER had helped bump off Terri. Now after Foley, they have no moral standing with regard to protecting the disabled or protecting children from predators.

Where are the conservatives in the GOP? They need to step up and get back in charge!

132 posted on 10/05/2006 10:39:17 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
The scientologists dropped him. LOL That's pretty bad because they'll take just about anybody - to wash dishes, to take out the trash, to pay to learn about their diety zenu. Tom Cruise is way up there. He's not taking out the trash...

Remember Lisa MacPherson. She wasn't a movie star.

133 posted on 10/05/2006 10:41:20 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
Chef fell off the bridge between South Park over to The Adventurer's Club into a ravine.

This was the episode after South Park criticized Tom Cruise. Issac Hayes quit South Park over the previous episode so they killed his character off in the cartoon.

If they dropped Foley, holy cow.

134 posted on 10/05/2006 10:53:01 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: T'wit; Twirly Bird; Sun
I'm not a fan of David Corn who was written up in today's World Net Daily. He claims to have "the list" of gay GOPers and said he doesn't intend to publish it. Here's from World Net Daily.

...."Corn said "The List," as it's called, includes nine chiefs of staffs, two press secretaries and two directors of communications. Among the Republican lawmakers for whom they work are Rep. Katherine Harris, Rep. Henry Hyde, Sen. Bill Frist, Sen. George Allen, Sen. Mitch McConnell and Sen. Rick Santorum.

Corn says he has a copy of the list but won't publish it.

"For one, I don't know for a fact that the men on the list are gay," he writes. "And generally I don't fancy outing people – though I have not objected when others have outed gay Republicans, who, after all, work for a party that tries to limit the rights of gays and lesbians and that welcomes the support of those who demonize same-sexers."

135 posted on 10/05/2006 10:56:41 AM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
I predicted this early on, this is going to blow up in the face of these Dummyrats.

Not every American is a stupid hayseed as the Dummyrats think we are.

Have we forget that the Dummies think of the majority of us as "fly over country!"
136 posted on 10/05/2006 11:24:51 AM PDT by paratrooper82 (82 Airborne 1/508th BN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eva
The Demorats have made it clear that homosexuals are pedophiles, creeps, disgusting and conservative.

Now all Americans will run right in November and vote for the Demorats!

Now for a reality check!

Most Americans see this for what it is, a political hit, which tool out a closet homosexual that they knew about for years. Foley did the right thing and resigned. Once again, the Demorats are over playing their hand, now wanting the Speaker of the House to resign, and any other Republican who knew anything about this.

NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!
137 posted on 10/05/2006 11:33:33 AM PDT by paratrooper82 (82 Airborne 1/508th BN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Here's interesting info on the radaronline.com itself, it's somewhat different from most other WHOIS profiles (notice it was "modified" just few months before Foley's IMs leak after 5 years in existence - ownership change? or putting a "Transfer-Lock"?, no IP, domain) :

Whois - Domain Information Lookup
Connecting to COM.whois-servers.net...
Connecting to whois.pairnic.com...

Integrity Multimedia Co. LLC
1101 W. Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60607
US

PhilB@radaronline.com
+1.3123372337

Domain Name: RADARONLINE.COM

Technical Contact:
Mike Martin
Onsite Technology Solutions
1555 Sherman Ave. #232
Evanston, IL 60201
US

Mike.Martin@onsite-ts.com
+1.6302908736

Administrative Contact:
Phil Birnbaum
Integrity Multimedia Co. LLC
1101 W. Lake Street
Chicago, IL 60607
US

PhilB@radaronline.com
+1.3123372337

Domain Name Servers:
NS1.PAIRNIC.COM
NS2.PAIRNIC.COM

Transfer-Lock Status: ENABLED

Created: June 12, 2001
Modified: June 13, 2006
Expires: June 12, 2007




...and more from another search




OrgName: pair Networks
OrgID: PAIR
Address: 2403 Sidney St
Address: Suite 510
City: Pittsburgh
StateProv: PA
PostalCode: 15232
Country: US

NetRange: 209.68.0.0 - 209.68.63.255
CIDR: 209.68.0.0/18
NetName: PAIRNET
NetHandle: NET-209-68-0-0-1
Parent: NET-209-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS1.PAIR.COM
NameServer: NS0.NS0.COM
Comment: ADDRESSES WITHIN THIS BLOCK ARE NON-PORTABLE
RegDate: 1997-04-15
Updated: 2001-06-14

RTechHandle: KM383-ARIN
RTechName: Martin, Kevin J.
RTechPhone: +1-412-381-7247
RTechEmail: sigma@pair.com

OrgAbuseHandle: ABUSE848-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse Handling
OrgAbusePhone: +1-412-381-7247
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@pair.com

OrgTechHandle: KM383-ARIN
OrgTechName: Martin, Kevin J.
OrgTechPhone: +1-412-381-7247
OrgTechEmail: sigma@pair.com

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-10-04 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.




Kevin J. Martin and Mike Martin could be related, or could be coincidence.

Hope it can help shed the light on this sordid matter... Pajamahadeens (sp?), you can take it from here.


138 posted on 10/05/2006 11:53:44 AM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter

David Corn sounds like a phony.


139 posted on 10/05/2006 11:56:29 AM PDT by Sun (Hillary had a D-/F rating on immigration; now she wants to build a wall????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Suzy Quzy

See post #138. Doesn't directly answer your question, but a good first step in that direction. "Modified: June 13, 2006" item certainly should be of interest to investigators...

Sorry, didn't see your post and ping you (just starting on FR)


140 posted on 10/05/2006 12:26:42 PM PDT by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Thanks SuziQ. You post #118 is right on.


141 posted on 10/05/2006 3:28:42 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; YaYa123
Yaya had an interesting theory yesterday, in which she thinks these boys weren't "victims" but rather were kids who thought Foley was creepy and egged him on to see what they could get him to say.

How prescient!!

142 posted on 10/05/2006 5:42:14 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
The most disgusting part of this business, beyond Foley's perversions, is how the above 'Rats (whoever they may be, and may they soon be revealed) thought it more important to save up this information to exploit politically at the most opportune time for them, leaving minors at risk in the meantime.

Yes, it's the D's fault, not Foley's.

It's unbelievable how many on FR are defending this guy.

143 posted on 10/05/2006 6:37:04 PM PDT by Penner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Penner

Wise up Sparky. Show me ONE post that I've made regarding Foley in which I have defended him.

NObody is defending Foley because what he did WAS disgusting, however what the 'Rats appear to have done is damn near EQUALLY disgusting because they chose to sit on that information about Foley until it was the most advantageous time to blow the whistle.


144 posted on 10/05/2006 7:54:29 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; All

"leaving minors at risk"


Yes, I have been especially disgusted with this aspect. Whoever knew about any of this garbage from Foley .. thought it was more important to save the stuff to hit the repubs with during an election time than it was to make sure the young pages were safe.

I find this as much or more reprehensible than what Foley did.

However, my local talk radio guy, Roger Hedgecock, interviewed one of the parents of a current page, and he was very confident in what the repubs did and how they handled the issue .. and he considered the pages safe.

Also .. what's not being said is that the contacts with one Page happened AFTER HE LEFT THE PAGE PROGRAM.


145 posted on 10/05/2006 9:32:41 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

I am sure there are some Democrats who think it's rather funny that a Republican is resigning under circumstances for which they practice on a daily basis. These are sick demented people with no morals whatsoever.


146 posted on 10/05/2006 9:35:13 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468

I agree. The double standard is very evident.


147 posted on 10/05/2006 9:38:10 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
So, Fordham fell out of favor with Foley (for a younger man), and the bitch set him up.

MSM is more than willing to spread the lies, - they even volunteered to make up new ones.

148 posted on 10/05/2006 10:21:31 PM PDT by mcenedo (lying liberal media - our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Wise up Sparky. Show me ONE post that I've made regarding Foley in which I have defended him.

NObody is defending Foley because what he did WAS disgusting, however what the 'Rats appear to have done is damn near EQUALLY disgusting because they chose to sit on that information about Foley until it was the most advantageous time to blow the whistle.

Damn near equally disgusting?

You RNC hacks are sick.

149 posted on 10/06/2006 12:18:57 AM PDT by Penner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Penner; All

You don't get it do you "Penner"?

If someone knows of the behavior of somebody like Foley, and sits on the information, and indeed USES that information for their own partisan purposes, that makes them every bit as offensive as Foley.

And once again, nobody is defending Foley, and you failed to cite any post of mine in which I did anything close to it. Like most sleeper-trolls, you make accusations (i.e., that I'm "defending" Foley) and when you're called on to back them up, you can't do it.

I'm surprised you've survived this long without hearing the sound of the Viking Kitties approaching.

(sniff, is that Ozone in the air?)


150 posted on 10/06/2006 5:03:42 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson