Skip to comments.ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney
A posting of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has apparently exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser...
ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF ONE CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK STATED THE MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
Yes, it is discusting, but the left has been condoning this type of behaviour for years. BJC had an actual physical, intimate relationship with an intern, and the left still defends his actions to this day. Homosexuality doesn't bother them(Barney Frank.)
If this guy is 17 or 18 seems to make all the difference in the world. Why? I don't know. At 45, there doesn't seem to be much difference between 18 and 17. It was wrong by my standards, but it would seem to be extremely hypocrytical by the standards of those that would defend Bill Clinton and homosexuality.
Not condoning Foley's behaviour, simply pointing out the political hypocracy of the left and the MSM.
I got it all on word document
Monica was still an intern, however. Apparently these individuals were no longer in the custody or care of the house when these IMs were exchanges. ABC has been CBSed. Story over by Friday....collusion between ABC/CREW/DNC will be the story of the day shortly thereafter. When will Ross issue an on air apology? When will Nancy Pelosi resign for her lies? Is this the Rove October surprise afterall? Or is that the criminal investigation of Rocky, et al, regarding the release of highly classified information to the NYTimes? Or the dropping of the charges against Libby and the indictment of Val and Joe? Media frenzy is beyond belief on this story...these people are salivating and it is quite funny to watch. Ross back-tracked big time on Mr. O's show tonight.....watch for more of that soon.
I have no sympathy for Foley, but the timing of this reeks of Dem dirty tricks.
It seems the only thing Drudge is attacking is ABC for providing false info.
Then believe what you want and stop asking people to prove things to you.
Has it occurred to anyone that 10% of all congressional pages are homosexual, and that the gay congresscritters seek them out with their own brand of Gaydar?
I ask that question as a logical extension of gay claims.
Go away TROLL.
Drudge has had a history of attacking the accuser in pedophile cases. I would take anything that Drudge says with a grain of salt.
Foley folded like cheap lawn furniture....
I can't wait for the conspiracy theories now..rove managed to plant the story of the "underage" page, which the dems jumped on without checking facts, only to find out he was much older and no crime took place, leaving the dems with egg on their face and having to now either "accept" the behavior OR pi*s off the gay crowd..(as an aside, the GOP gets rid of a gay before something truly bad comes out)..
Rove, you magnifient bas*ard..ROFL
This is just one of the guys; this is not the guy from the southeast.
KEEP THAT IN MIND.
However, he is one of the accusers whose postings ended up on ABC News. They forgot to redact one of his names.
He also works for Rep. Istook. I won't go so far as to say he is an operative, but this guy did a terrible thing by releasing this now and may seriously hurt the GOP, and I hope he is fired.
Another freeper knows him and says he is a creep capable of dirty tricks.
Does anyone even know the age of consent in Florida? Or DC? I know it's ridiculously low in some states.
Neither do we have proof the page or ex page was underage, just Brian Ross' word. Besides, as much as I've read about this story, I didn't hear anyone say the Ims were to someone who was close to being 18. What I came away with in reading the initial IMs was that you had 2 guys who were willingly chatting about guy stuff, to put it delicately.
I am not trying to believe anything. I am looking for facts.
2. If above is true, since when does he have a radio show
2. For several years now.
Good summary to date.
"Roger" on that. He is always a day or two late and still doesn't quite get it right.
That was the IM they used to establish his birthday as Feb 23.
I said it for 3 days now, JUST ANOTHER ONE LIKE CBS/RATHER BOMB! WOOHOO!
Don't have a clue.
2. If above is true, since when does he have a radio show
Again, clueless. I have heard ad's for his radio show for months but, as stated, just started playing here this week.
Vision Thing - you apparently have a Humor Thing too.
Of that I have no doubt, but does he have a chance. I'd guess that he doesn't unless his name appears on the ballot, preferably instead of Foley's. Will that happen?
Have you read the blog and looked at the evidence he links to/posts?
Sure, I suppose he could falsify stuff, but that'd be pretty stupid.
In DC it is 16. I'm not sure what it is in Florida, but there's also federal laws that apply to Internet communications that set the age for some things at 18.
There will be lots of backpedaling by the Dems and the media now.
Here are Jordan's stats from floppingaces.net:
An excellent job done by Wild Bill at Passionate America in discovering who the IMs were sent to, one Jordon Edmund who appears to have been 18 at the time of the IMs, here is his bio on MySpace:
2003 to Present
University Of California-Berkeley
Degree: In Progress
Major: Political Science
Minor: Public Policy
Clubs: Cal Hawaii Club - Former Vice President, Student Homecoming Team - Student Ambassador Coordinator(04) Alumni Director(06), Cal Ski and Snowboard Club
Greek: Phi Gamma Delta
2002 to 2003
Francis W. Parker School
Student status: Alumni
Degree: High School Diploma
Congrats to the Democrats, they outed cybersex between two consenting adults!
And one other thing, Wild Bill found this out by doing some detective work when ABC accidently left the IM screenname of Jordon. Did ABC News and Brian Ross do the same kind of investigating? You bet your ass they did, that is their job.
The question is, did they know that Jordon was an adult at the time of the IMs and then print a lie that it was with a minor?
I DO, SAID IT FOR 3 DAYS NOW!
Yes, I have. Cite where the proof is. I don't see it. Sorry
This is JUST ONE ACCUSER. Please keep this in mind. It does not sink the story.
Comments section, post #6
FYI, you may have heard this, but Selena Zito with the Pittsburgh Tribune Review (Im pretty sure thats right) called in on a local (Birmingham,Alabama) talk radio program this morning. She said a major story might break today that a high ranking Democrat knew about the Foley matter and she hinted there was coordination with ABC, probably through George Stephanopoulos to release the story. (Not taking away from what a disgusting creep Foley is, but considering the reaction by the Dems to the story, this would look pretty bad for them IMO). Zito said she had a few more facts to verify, she does not want to report anything until shes absolutely certain.
She also said other outings would most likely occur before the election and would further hurt the Republicans although she said Democrats would probably be affected as well.
Im paraphrasing what she said, this is basically the gist of it. When the talk radio host asked when this might come out, she said he would be her second phone call.
OF COURSE it was a bogus story! Of course there were lies and misrepresentations by ABC, the DIMS, and the Driveby Media in general.....did you honestly expect anything sincere and actually truthful out of these POS's?
Wow. Somebody screwed up, BIG TIME! Breaking and Breaking FAST!
It is now known that he is currently at/over 21, so, unless they're using the "new math" that puts him at 18 in 2003.
Geez, can you stop being a broken record for even two seconds?
Ross's word and Foley's actions after the revolation. And it looks from the IMs and the history we have of the page, he was under 18.
See my post at #281.
Starting with the pedophile in Chief.
Check it out...
The one that was 18 also wasn't a page anymore when the incident happened.
Let's be clear - I do NOT condone what Mark Foley has done. But does this mean that the Democrats think that Foley's sexual behavior with an adult is illegal?
If so, does this mean that the Democrats believe that Clinton's behavior with an adult was illegal?
If not, does this mean that Democrats believe that Foley's behavior with an adult male is illegal only because he is gay?
Either way, the Democrats are hoist by their own petard - and once again, the main-stream media has manufactured information to suite it's agenda.
But no matter. I am convinced that we do need to investigate Foley to the fullest, just to find out if he IS guilty of any crimes. And we MUST also investigate EVERYONE, Democrat, Republican, or otherwise - in both houses of Congress - for the same. All emails, all correspondence, all phone conversations. EVERYTHING on EVERYBODY.
It's time to clean house of paid public perverts - and we have Foley to thank. I personally am glad Foley was "outed" for his digusting behavior on my dime - but I wonder; will the Democrats will be as happy with these revelations once they find their own in the mix?
Clinton had phone sex in the oval ofice numerous times with Monica and HE DIDN'T resign.
FReeper donnalee suggested that Foley was being very careful about these contacts' ages to avoid the "under-18" problem. If the pre-18 IM contacts were not released by ABC, it's possible that they aren't as juicy as the ones they did release. Maybe they were just "overly friendly". They didn't suit ABC's agenda, so they didn't bother with them.