Skip to comments.ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney
A posting of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has apparently exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser...
ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF ONE CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK STATED THE MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
There will be lots of backpedaling by the Dems and the media now.
Here are Jordan's stats from floppingaces.net:
An excellent job done by Wild Bill at Passionate America in discovering who the IMs were sent to, one Jordon Edmund who appears to have been 18 at the time of the IMs, here is his bio on MySpace:
2003 to Present
University Of California-Berkeley
Degree: In Progress
Major: Political Science
Minor: Public Policy
Clubs: Cal Hawaii Club - Former Vice President, Student Homecoming Team - Student Ambassador Coordinator(04) Alumni Director(06), Cal Ski and Snowboard Club
Greek: Phi Gamma Delta
2002 to 2003
Francis W. Parker School
Student status: Alumni
Degree: High School Diploma
Congrats to the Democrats, they outed cybersex between two consenting adults!
And one other thing, Wild Bill found this out by doing some detective work when ABC accidently left the IM screenname of Jordon. Did ABC News and Brian Ross do the same kind of investigating? You bet your ass they did, that is their job.
The question is, did they know that Jordon was an adult at the time of the IMs and then print a lie that it was with a minor?
I DO, SAID IT FOR 3 DAYS NOW!
Yes, I have. Cite where the proof is. I don't see it. Sorry
This is JUST ONE ACCUSER. Please keep this in mind. It does not sink the story.
Comments section, post #6
FYI, you may have heard this, but Selena Zito with the Pittsburgh Tribune Review (Im pretty sure thats right) called in on a local (Birmingham,Alabama) talk radio program this morning. She said a major story might break today that a high ranking Democrat knew about the Foley matter and she hinted there was coordination with ABC, probably through George Stephanopoulos to release the story. (Not taking away from what a disgusting creep Foley is, but considering the reaction by the Dems to the story, this would look pretty bad for them IMO). Zito said she had a few more facts to verify, she does not want to report anything until shes absolutely certain.
She also said other outings would most likely occur before the election and would further hurt the Republicans although she said Democrats would probably be affected as well.
Im paraphrasing what she said, this is basically the gist of it. When the talk radio host asked when this might come out, she said he would be her second phone call.
OF COURSE it was a bogus story! Of course there were lies and misrepresentations by ABC, the DIMS, and the Driveby Media in general.....did you honestly expect anything sincere and actually truthful out of these POS's?
Wow. Somebody screwed up, BIG TIME! Breaking and Breaking FAST!
It is now known that he is currently at/over 21, so, unless they're using the "new math" that puts him at 18 in 2003.
Geez, can you stop being a broken record for even two seconds?
Ross's word and Foley's actions after the revolation. And it looks from the IMs and the history we have of the page, he was under 18.
See my post at #281.
Starting with the pedophile in Chief.
Check it out...
The one that was 18 also wasn't a page anymore when the incident happened.
Let's be clear - I do NOT condone what Mark Foley has done. But does this mean that the Democrats think that Foley's sexual behavior with an adult is illegal?
If so, does this mean that the Democrats believe that Clinton's behavior with an adult was illegal?
If not, does this mean that Democrats believe that Foley's behavior with an adult male is illegal only because he is gay?
Either way, the Democrats are hoist by their own petard - and once again, the main-stream media has manufactured information to suite it's agenda.
But no matter. I am convinced that we do need to investigate Foley to the fullest, just to find out if he IS guilty of any crimes. And we MUST also investigate EVERYONE, Democrat, Republican, or otherwise - in both houses of Congress - for the same. All emails, all correspondence, all phone conversations. EVERYTHING on EVERYBODY.
It's time to clean house of paid public perverts - and we have Foley to thank. I personally am glad Foley was "outed" for his digusting behavior on my dime - but I wonder; will the Democrats will be as happy with these revelations once they find their own in the mix?
Clinton had phone sex in the oval ofice numerous times with Monica and HE DIDN'T resign.
FReeper donnalee suggested that Foley was being very careful about these contacts' ages to avoid the "under-18" problem. If the pre-18 IM contacts were not released by ABC, it's possible that they aren't as juicy as the ones they did release. Maybe they were just "overly friendly". They didn't suit ABC's agenda, so they didn't bother with them.