"You do not have links to that evidence!"
Posted on 10/07/2006 9:08:18 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
That didn't work either.
http://www.talkorigins.org/index/CC/CC200.html (what you wrote)
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html (what Professor Kill wrote)
See the difference?
I really don't know why I'm bothering, but:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils
http://www.asa3.org/asa/resources/Miller.html
http://members.aol.com/darwinpage/transitionals.htm#Transitionals
http://members.aol.com/darwinpage/hominid.htm
Pearls to swine placemarker
Yes, but never forget, the lurkers can see who presents evidence, and who responds, "You can't make me see!"
Not just the lurkers. Everyone can see it. Except, maybe, the person who has his hands over his eyes so he can't see anything.
How punctuated do you have to believe it was before you become an evil Creationist.
Bookmarked
Lead a horse - Placemarker -
It has everything to do with it actually. You choose to go back to time X+1 and determine how Y evolved from this point. I am asking where X came from. I am going to the crux of the matter. Saying this has nothing to do with evolution is foolish.
I once calculated using the temperature of the cosmic background radiation, the temperature of quark confinement, the volume of a sphere, and rough estimates of cosmological and geological timescales to find that 6 days = 15.4 billion years, and the end of the 7th day is in a few hundred thousand years. (Yes this is based on Gerald Shroeder)
Not as cool as the 2012 Mayan end of the world date, and both sides have shredded Shroeder's argument for the alignment of Genesis timing (I find the critiques misunderstand either the science involved or the Bible). I would like to think though, that humanity will fully explore the universe before time is up.
Dunno.
The universe is a BIG place, a few hundred thousand years is such a short time.
"The universe is a BIG place, a few hundred thousand years is such a short time."
A couple thousand years ago, the Earth was a huge place. I suspect that eventually, getting TV from across the universe will only have a 5-second delay for bleeping out profanity.
"Robertson? I mention Robertson only once and use him to prove the point that ID is Creationism, not science. I did not discuss Robertson at all in my post afterward. Therefore, I did not rant about him at all did I?
Nice spin... you avoided all the points I brought up by deceptively claiming my post was a rant about Robertson. I really don't like it when people pull that crap on me. I feel it is dishonest."
According to your definition, your comments above demonstrate a rant.
Are you still here spinning? You lost OK? I caught your deception and you couldn't address any of my points. Now quit digging that hole you are in any deeper... it is embarrassing to watch.
Red X!
How did you do that?
"I am asking where X came from."
See post #350.
I answered your questions. Obviously not the answers you wanted but that's rather mute isn't it? Your obvously an egotistical control freak.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.