Skip to comments.
France questions 'failed' Korean nuclear test
The Times ^
| October 11, 2006
| Devika Bhat
Posted on 10/11/2006 2:32:08 PM PDT by MadIvan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: MadIvan
And maybe they lit the bomb and it went off. I will always error on the side of assuming where there is smoke there is fire.
Frogs, do not like to admit to one of thier allies are caught misbehaving, as in North Korea.
Ops4
21
posted on
10/11/2006 3:03:06 PM PDT
by
OPS4
(Ops4 God Bless America!)
To: RightWhale
Meanwhile back in Pyonpyang a ronery dear leader wonders aloud what else he needs to do to get attention.
To: MadIvan
OK. Saddam behaved like he also had nukes. Its still not clear if he knowingly bluffed, or indeed suffered a grandeur delusion, or his WMDs are well hidden away. But it really does not matter. We can't afford to make a rogue state to use a nuke threat or nuke bluff as a deterrent. NK is long overdue for a regime change.
Even in the height of the USSR power soviets were passing around NK magazines (in Russian) for a good laugh. Surreal, isn't it?
23
posted on
10/11/2006 3:15:49 PM PDT
by
Tolik
To: MadIvan
it produced an explosion so small that if indeed it was nuclear, it had been a failure Unless it is intended for use with the "no-dong" missile
To: MadIvan
["Whats important is to determine is whether this was chemical or nuclear. Its possible that we never will."]
Since the seismic activity allows us to pinpoint the exact location of the explosion, why don't we just send in a military blitzkrieg to take over that one spot and have our experts determine which it was? If it WAS nuclear, then there is justification to declare them a hostile state and deal with them appropriately and other nations have no credibility to complain. If it wasn't nuclear, then we will have exposed them as frauds and the squawking little dictator will forever be a laughingstock.
What am I thinking? That would be a PRACTICAL solution to the problem.
25
posted on
10/11/2006 3:24:03 PM PDT
by
spinestein
(Please do not make illegal copies of this tag line.)
To: MadIvan
"To ensure THE neutron is fired"? How 'bout them physics! LOL.
26
posted on
10/11/2006 3:24:07 PM PDT
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: MadIvan
Well, the French are experts in nuclear tests! :-P
27
posted on
10/11/2006 3:36:33 PM PDT
by
Irish_Thatcherite
(A vote for Bertie Ahern is a vote for Gerry Adams!|What if I lecture Americans about America?)
To: dfwgator
"And trust me, if there's anyone who knows about military failures, it's the French."
You are so right!!!!French expertise in Chanel No.5 bombs!
28
posted on
10/11/2006 3:38:50 PM PDT
by
SeeSalt
To: SeeSalt
Copy of Lil' Kim's IQ results...
29
posted on
10/11/2006 4:06:46 PM PDT
by
Colonial Warrior
(Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction.)
To: 2harddrive
It's in the accuracy. The neutron must be fired through the center of the mass within a millimeter.
30
posted on
10/11/2006 4:21:15 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: MadIvan
China balked at the idea of giving any UN resolution teeth, a sign that it would not tolerate anything that would destabilise the region by toppling the North Korean Government, causing chaos on its doorstep and a likely refugee exodus.Why aren't South Korea and Russia also worried about a refugee exodus?
31
posted on
10/11/2006 4:24:53 PM PDT
by
fso301
To: MadIvan
Yes, and the geopolitical er-"orientation" of the French is ambiguous enough for me to wonder how your average Frenchman would react to seeing someone with a rolled up sock stuck in his pants. For all we know, France might decide to end sanctions against North Korea just to give them a sporting chance.
32
posted on
10/11/2006 4:32:37 PM PDT
by
dr_who_2
To: daisyann
The White House is set to procure a dictionary of harsh language, and will then issue a harsher statement to North Korea ... after receiving UN approval of course.
To: MadIvan; Paul Ross; DarkWaters; Carl/NewsMax; ntrulock
It is interesting to me that almost no one in the mainstream wants to "go there" regarding the possibility that the blast was actually larger than seismic measurements indicated, and that P-wave decoupling was used to acheive that exact effect. The reason this is a "don't go there" notion is because during the Test Ban Treaty debates of yore, the ideas of concealment and cheating by the enemies of the West were held up by the usual suspects as "right wing paranoia." There is a lot more riding on this whole thing than the DPRK's nuclear status. What is really riding on it is whether or not the naive utopian dream of nuclear disarmament gets discredited or not.
34
posted on
10/11/2006 4:58:44 PM PDT
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: MadIvan
ROFL or need nuke viagra LOL!
35
posted on
10/11/2006 5:21:41 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
("Step aside Jefe"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: MadIvan
36
posted on
10/11/2006 5:22:14 PM PDT
by
Suzy Quzy
("When Cabals Go Kabooms"....upcoming book on Mary McCarthy's Coup-Plotters.)
To: MadIvan
The US needs to agree to bilateral talks immediately! That way we sit across the table from them and laugh:
"Do you call that a Nuke?"!
37
posted on
10/11/2006 5:29:36 PM PDT
by
kcar
(The UN Sucks)
To: MadIvan
This may be true, but it's their intent that matters. If left alone, they will develop a nuclear weapon, and they will sell that technology.
38
posted on
10/11/2006 5:29:41 PM PDT
by
NewLand
(Always Remember September 11, 2001)
To: MadIvan
The proposals include stopping trade in any materials which could be used to produce weapons of mass destruction, cargo inspections for goods going in and out of the country, and, in a measure targeted at the country's tiny elite, a ban on luxury goods. Unbelievable! This should have already been done, yet China and Russia find it too harsh. I guess anything that does not damage the US is too harsh.
To: truth_seeker
France, experts on small failed explosions. When it comes to nuclear stuff France knows what they're talking about. They're the leaders in the field.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson