Posted on 10/20/2006 12:22:57 PM PDT by presidio9
Just so you know adulters are just as "deviant" as homosexuals and do much more harm to their families.
I don't see a crusade to kick out all adulters too.
The fact is that homosexuality is yes against what the Bible teaches. However, I would happily vote in a homosexual Republican over many other wanna be Republicans and certainly over a Democrat.
That homosexual is going to have to answer to God like the rest of us. If they want to face that then let them do that. I'm certainly not going to hold someone out of office based on one issue.
One can always hope. The big tent is a morass. (That could be a pun I guess)
A Pink Nazi is a Pink Nazi: it matters not whether they call themselves Republican or Democrat. Trust a Pink Nazi like you would trust a Muslim with a rocket launcher.
True, but they produce about 55% of the hot air of this country and about 80% of the petulant, self-indulgent whining we hear.
I'm sick of their whining. Even if their "lifestyle" wasn't ungodly and destructive, I'd be sick of their noise.
Any politician forthright enough to tell the organized political homosexual bellyachers to take a hike has gone a long way in getting my vote.
Flexible morality as tought in government schools.
Homosexual Republican is about a valid as saying "Bill Clinton home for unwed mothers."
I have no problem electing sinners to public office. It's only the ones who deny that their sin is sin that I have an issue with...
Adultery aka cheating on your husband or wife is a behavior
Homsoexuality is a behavior which is only abour recreational sex.
There is no Adultry coalition or HRC style coalition to give adulterers special rights.
cheaters acknowledge they are cheating. They may have excuses but they admit it is cheating. Homsoexuals trying and have the society forced into considering their behavior as normal.
The two are apples and oranges. (s)besides all homosexuals are not to blame because all homsoexuals were molested by catholic priests and therefor the real person to blame for homsoexuals is GWBush.(/s)
I don't see a crusade to kick out all adulters too.
Sin is sin and adultery is just as much a sin in God's eyes as homosexuality. But in a political sense, there is no adulterers' lobby, no pressure for inclusion of adulterers as adulterers.
..AND that they want to IMPOSE their sin ON EVERYBODY ELSE!... That is the part I don't like
"just shut up and vote...anyway you like!" :)
I understand that.. but then attack the lobby not the individual.
I'm just irritated with people that forget that this country is for everyone of every religion and of every belief system.
If people choose to be Atheist that's fine but if they understand our Constitution and fight to enforce then that's the guy I want in office.
How is it apples and oranges? Certainly not all of them are for forcing homosexuality into our schools and every where else.. they just want to be left alone.
Again it comes down to people just not understanding what this is really about. We are talking about individuals with agendas.. both sides who want to paint everyone the same way should be kept on the fringes where they should be.
And heteros don't engage in recreational sex? There aren't people who "swing"? There are all sort of lifestyles people are trying to push mainstream.
Give me a break.. it's not about homosexuals... it's about people feeling insecure enough about themselves that they don't focus on their own sin and have to rant and rave about one group of people.. it's totally ridculous.
Are you serious? Have you ever been drunk? Swore? Gamble? Stolen?
News flash for someone who doesn't understand the bible. We are all sinners.. we will always be sinners.. and we cannot stop our own sinning no matter how much we educate ourselves about what is sin.
As a wise man once said.......
We all have a vice.. and we sure do love it.
That's rich.. judge my morality....
Gay population explosion underway right in front of our noses and we never noticed a thing.
"This story and the foley story is about convincing the weak-minded that this is not an excuse to avoid the RAT party -- see, the republicans do it too."
I don't agree that that was the expressed purpose of the story, though some readers may think it speaks to them that way.
I think the writer went looking for "gay" Republicans leaving the party in droves over the Foley affair (though a small minority can't actually do anything in droves). I think the writer was reasonably surprised that that was not what they found.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.